We performed a comparison between OutSystems and Unqork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."Their out-of-the-box UI is quite good."
"Once built, web/mobile components can be reused in all new developments. In addition, the OutSystems Forge is very useful. We can exchange components and even already-built applications, reducing costs to build specific solutions."
"I find it to be a genuinely cool and effective platform for my development needs."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it allows users to easily build applications."
"It is a stable solution, and the initial setup is straightforward."
"OutSystems is easy to use."
"OutSystems' low-cost approach has positively impacted our productivity, because we were able to develop faster with OutSystems, enabling us to implement many changes during our sprint."
"Speed of delivery: We were able to reduce development time by 30%."
"Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors."
"OutSystems could improve by being more like GitHub. It would be more helpful for us for division management and version control for our application."
"I have difficulty in using several new features. Some of the product's features are tricky to use as well."
"We'd like OutSystems to add stronger workflow-based automation similar to what Appian offers. It needs more workflow modeling and RPA features."
"When shared extensions are updated, all the applications are redeployed."
"The largest obstacle currently associated with OutSystems is its high cost and limited availability of skilled personnel. Despite being a rapid application development platform, having a highly skilled individual familiar with the platform can be much more beneficial than an inexperienced individual. Because there is a shortage of people with the necessary OutSystems skills, utilizing the platform can become expensive. This makes little sense, considering that a rapid application development platform should be accessible to the average person. However, having a highly skilled individual can greatly increase productivity, making the cost worthwhile."
"The latest version of the app generation tools could be more user-friendly."
"The product could be improved if there was a shortcut, or predefined, predictable templates provided."
"We had some lagging issues under high data loads, and the solution needed to be customized to improve this."
"The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon."
OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Rapid Application Development Software with 46 reviews while Unqork is ranked 24th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. OutSystems is rated 8.4, while Unqork is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Unqork writes "Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support". OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Mendix, Appian, ServiceNow and QuickBase, whereas Unqork is most compared with Pega BPM, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps, Salesforce Platform and ServiceNow Now Platform.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.