We performed a comparison between Pega BPM and Unqork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."It is easy to use, easy to understand, easy to implement and easy to enhance and we can do it as a Cloud. Also it is very user friendly."
"This solution is useful for business process management if you have any banking solutions or need to manage a process."
"The most valuable feature is the situational layer cake."
"Pega BPM has a full suite for any enterprise. It is a process orchestration platform. It has detailed features for case management and workflows."
"Decreased time for plane departures and landing, supported analytical insight for planning of three to six month forecasting, and helped with operational decision planning and support."
"The solution is able to support the size and scale required."
"The solution offers excellent workflows."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is its architecture."
"Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors."
"Pega should work on redefining their model and creating a demand for their skills."
"Pega BPM could be improved by including token-based authentication and extending its integration options."
"The solution's pricing model or licensing model could be a little better."
"The local development approach is good in Pega, however, cost-wise, it's getting expensive. That needs to be addressed."
"Reporting is not so clear and not so great. We really struggle to get the right reporting. When we need reporting based on the content of the tickets, we are not able to get it. The MIS reporting is not great. That's one of the reasons why we are switching to ServiceNow. Its compatibility with the higher versions of Internet Explorer should be improved. It really works well in Mozilla Firefox or any other browser, but when it comes to Microsoft Edge or Internet Explorer, sometimes, the layout gets disturbed. The positioning of the buttons changes, and there is some distortion in the layout. I am not sure whether it is our configuration problem or Pega's, but when it is working in Mozilla Firefox, it should also work in Microsoft Edge or Internet Explorer."
"The pricing model needs to be improved. Right now, it's too expensive."
"In the next release of Pega BPM, they should add more ways to do the customer interaction fields in the portals."
"There are some UX shortcomings within the solution. However, it's my understanding that they have addressed them and in the next three months they will come out with a new updated version. They will be moving away from HTML5."
"The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon."
Pega BPM is ranked 7th in Rapid Application Development Software with 57 reviews while Unqork is ranked 24th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. Pega BPM is rated 8.2, while Unqork is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Unqork writes "Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and ARIS BPA, whereas Unqork is most compared with Appian, Microsoft Power Apps, Salesforce Platform, OutSystems and ServiceNow Now Platform.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.