We performed a comparison between SECDO Platform and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."This is stable and scalable."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"Technical support is great. Palo Alto is extremely helpful and responsive."
"It basically automates the entire alert investigation process."
"The ease of deployment is a valuable feature."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"It has intelligent learning behind it and we have been very successful in preventing attacks."
"There's lots of very useful documentation online to help troubleshoot and learn about the product."
"Provides visibility into the chain of attack and threats that use valid operating system processes to execute attacks."
"It actually does some heuristics, and some behavioral analysis."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is one of the best EDR tools in the market."
"We have another piece of that infrastructure that does what they call threat emulation. It's like sandboxing where it takes files that it doesn't know about, puts them in a VM-type environment, and it kicks them off to see if there's any malware or tendencies that might look like malware, that kind of thing."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"The price should be reduced in order to be more competitive in the market."
"Many will try to use this as an out-of-the-box solution, however, it needs to be configured to fit what a company would like to do with it."
"Maybe the notifications setting could use a simpler setting."
"Carbon Black has limited capability to integrate with Rapid7."
"Right now, Carbon Black CB Defense doesn't support cloud computing and Kubernetes."
"I would like to see the user credentials feature improved. I would also like to see more reporting features and better ways to roll the reports out."
"Based on all the security roles and the release privilege, it could take time for an application to be whitelisted and approved for use."
"I'm not sure as to the logic of how we've decided to customize it. We've only really used it since February and therefore there may be more to do on that front. That's why it's hard to say if something is missing or if we just aren't utilizing it."
"Its compatibility can be improved. It did crash a server during deployment, which is not something that I want to happen. Its deployment should also be easier. The whole deployment cycle needs to be simplified. It is an enterprise solution, and to set it up right now, you have to be an expert."
"I would personally give the tech support a rating of seven out of ten."
"The solution has to mature on container security and a lot of cloud environment security."
Earn 20 points
SECDO Platform is ranked 9th in Security Incident Response while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is ranked 1st in Security Incident Response with 61 reviews. SECDO Platform is rated 9.0, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SECDO Platform writes "Great documentation, good technical support, and very in-depth". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint writes "Centralization via the cloud allows us to protect and control people working from home". SECDO Platform is most compared with Fortinet FortiSOAR and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.