Check Point Harmony Endpoint Reviews

My main use case for Check Point Antivirus is to use it as an antivirus to protect our computers and systems.

We are focused on preventing malware and trojans with Check Point Antivirus, which helps us protect from viruses and other malicious attacks, although I do not have a specific situation to share.

Check Point Antivirus offers comprehensive security features, including real-time scanning based on signature-based detections, behavioral analysis, an anti-malware engine, machine learning, and sandboxing, which collectively protect our systems and computers effectively.

I find the most valuable features of Check Point Antivirus to be behavioral analysis and real-time scanning, as they collectively work to protect our systems.

Check Point Antivirus has positively impacted our organization by protecting our systems and computers, saving time, costs, and preventing data loss.

While I do not have any specific feature-related suggestions for improvement, I think reducing costs and providing as much technical information as possible would help users feel more comfortable installing and configuring the product.

Improvements could involve enhancing support documentation to make the installation and configuration processes easier for users.

I have been using Check Point Antivirus for a few months since we started using this antivirus.

Deploying Check Point Antivirus in our environment is not so hard. I logged into the management portal, downloaded the client provided by the antivirus, installed it on a few systems manually, and saw all systems on the management control panel.

My experience with the configuration process is quite easy; I did not encounter any significant challenges.

As of now, Check Point Antivirus is stable; I have not experienced any crashes or downtime.

We have purchased a limited number of licenses, but Check Point Antivirus can handle growth if our organization expands or adds more devices.

Customer support for Check Point Antivirus is really good; we haven't needed to contact them for technical support, but I found them helpful for licensing issues.

Positive

This is my first time using Check Point Antivirus.

The initial setup with Check Point Antivirus was easy and straightforward.

The pricing for Check Point Antivirus is a bit higher compared to other vendors or standalone antivirus options, and my request to the company is to consider reducing the licensing costs.

We did evaluate other options, specifically Sophos Endpoint Security, before ultimately deciding to choose Check Point Antivirus.

Check Point Antivirus is deployed on-premises in our organization, but we manage it from the cloud using a central platform to oversee all systems.

I work for an IT SI company that deals with various tech products, including servers like Netapp and Nutanix, and firewalls such as Check Point, FortiGate, Sophos, and Cisco, along with using Check Point Antivirus and Sophos Endpoint Security.

I request not to receive calls from representatives; I prefer communication via email.

Check Point Antivirus is a comprehensive antivirus that covers all aspects, including real-time scanning, signature-based detection, behavioral analysis, machine learning, and sandboxing integrations.

I rate Check Point Antivirus a 10 out of 10 because it is a comprehensive antivirus that covers all aspects of security.

On-premises

Other

I use Check Point Harmony Endpoint because it is an easy solution to implement and a good solution overall. It effectively does its work for me.

Harmony Endpoint has a geo policy that allows me to see where users log in from, enabling me to analyze if someone tries to access an account from another location. It offers a good false positive rate and provides protection across all platforms of 365.

One area that requires improvement is the amount of audit logs the system can save, as it is currently limited to fourteen days.

With Harmony Endpoint, I have three years of experience. With Harmony Email and Collaboration, I have five years of experience.

Deployment was easy and took less than a day, as it is a SaaS solution that partners with Check Point.

The stability of the tool is high, as I have not experienced any downtime.

It possesses high scalability because it is a SaaS solution from the cloud, allowing expansion as needed.

Although I have not contacted technical support recently, in the beginning, there were some issues that had to be addressed. Despite this, their support was helpful enough for me to give them a seven out of ten.

Neutral

Previously, my company used a Titan solution for email and collaboration. We switched to Check Point due to better pricing and additional protection on platforms like OneDrive, Teams, and all 365 platforms.

The initial setup was straightforward and completed within a day, which I would rate as an eight out of ten.

As a SaaS solution, it was implemented with Check Point's partner.

There has been a good return on investment. The product is affordable and provides excellent coverage and protection across multiple platforms.

The price for Check Point Harmony Endpoint is good considering the services it offers. It is not expensive and provides comprehensive coverage.

I recommend Check Point Harmony Endpoint to others if they need it. It depends on the infrastructure, yet it still provides good protection. Overall, I would rate the solution a five out of ten.

Public Cloud

Other

The main use of this product is endpoint security, it is very useful when you are trying to centralize endpoint security management and you want an easy and fast setup, I have used this product in POCs and different size deployments with different kinds of clients. Harmony offers several layers of protection and it fits well with all the Check Point "ecosystem", (It is especially useful when you are correlating security data because it can "talk" with Check Point's XDR Solution in order to get more insights).

There are several benefits that you can get with this solution:

1) You get centralized management of endpoints in your organization and you can be very granular in order to create endpoint security policies for different user groups. This improves overall security and visibility for IT departments.

2) Visibility also offers improvement with purchases and making decisions.

3) Information is easily managed and protected (which is particularly useful in lost or stolen endpoints).

4) It can be used with an XDR system (which is very useful with SOCs).

The most valuable aspects include:

1) Cloud Centralized management. This is particularly useful since you don't have to use any on-premise server, the cloud dashboard is activated without a minimum license number.

2) Several layers of security. It is well aligned with actual threats like ransomware and zero-day attacks and offers traditional layers of security.

3) Visibility. You have a single dashboard for all endpoint information that you need from an IT administrative perspective and in a threat incident you are properly advised.

There are some "weak points" that have to be mentioned, including:

1) If the IT department is used to "cloning" endpoints (making images) you are going to have a hard time trying to install the product and you are going to end up reading a lot of Check Point documents.

2) If you are used to the granularity of roles features in Check Point Quantums products you are going to be a little bit disappointed. You can't set customized roles with customized read/write permissions.

3) You need a mature security team to manage this solution in order to get the most value from it.

I've used this product since its release.

The solution is very stable in the correct context; with its cloud nature, it is unlikely to have any downtime.

The solution is very scalable since the console is a cloud; you only have to buy more licenses in order to grow.

TAC is very useful and its dashboard is very intuitive. You can get web, mail, and telephone support.

Positive

We used several solutions, such as Symantec, ESET, and Kaspersky.

The initial setup is straightforward. It is very fast due to its cloud nature.

We implemented the solution with the help of a vendor team; they have good documentation and are experts.

The ROI is very hard to measure. It is best to take a proactive posture of protecting your assets. 

It is a very good security product yet it is not the cheapest one. Licensing is very easy to understand and it includes Check Point TAC support.

We evaluated various solutions, including Symantec, ESET, Trellix, and Kaspersky.

It is a very mature solution and one of the most secure that exists in the security market share.

Private Cloud

Other

My main use case for Check Point Harmony Endpoint is that it gives us solid protection against malware, phishing, and ransomware, and I really appreciate the layered security approach and how it ties everything together in one cloud-based platform. It has been reliable for day-to-day use.

The best features that Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers help us to reduce incidents by catching threats early, which is highly effective. It gives us a wide view regarding the assets that we have and how exposed they are.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint has positively impacted our organization by helping to reduce incidents by catching threats early before users even noticed them, which saved us time and lowered risk across the board.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup is a little bit complex at first, and the console can feel overwhelming until you get used to it. It can be heavy on the system resources, especially on older machines.

Principally regarding the system performance, Check Point Harmony Endpoint impacts us significantly, and addressing this issue would make a substantial difference.

I have been using Check Point Harmony Endpoint for almost three years.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint is stable and we can improve our scalability significantly with it.

My experience with customer support for Check Point Harmony Endpoint was excellent. I have opened several cases and they were handled very efficiently and quickly. I would rate it as exceptional.

Positive

I previously used ESET before Check Point Harmony Endpoint, but we decided to switch to Check Point Harmony Endpoint.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Harmony Endpoint was positive. The price was good, the setup cost was reasonable, and the licensing was appropriate.

The pricing and setup cost felt reasonable compared with other solutions, and the price-performance ratio fit well with our company.

My advice for others looking into using Check Point Harmony Endpoint is that it is good software that effectively protects your company from malware, ransomware, and phishing. It excels in these areas, and you would feel secure using it in your company.

I rate Check Point Harmony Endpoint a nine out of ten because it needs improvement regarding system resource usage.

Public Cloud

Microsoft Azure

My main use case for Check Point Harmony Endpoint is that we wanted to have an EDR client that could run on our servers to act as an EDR.

I do not have anything else to add about my use case or why I needed it.

The best features Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers include fantastic forensic visibility along with a broad feature set that covers anti-malware, UBA, anti-phishing, and host-based firewalls, all centralized and easy to use through a cloud tenant.

The forensic visibility is valuable for my work because when an incident happens, it's very easy to see the forensic details and find out if it's a false positive or something that needs to be acted on.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint has impacted my organization positively by improving our security posture, but in the end, it didn't make the cut in the POC, so we went with another vendor.

During the time we used Check Point Harmony Endpoint, it improved our security posture, as we definitely got the visibility that we wanted, and it integrated well into the SIEM, so we got all the logs that we wanted.

I think Check Point Harmony Endpoint could be improved as I dislike the management interface because it's not intuitive, it lacks real-time reporting without configuring smart events, and it made administration less efficient.

The management interface felt unintuitive primarily due to the layout and navigation; you had to click around many different windows to find what you were looking for, and to resolve an incident, you needed to enter many windows.

I do not have anything else to add about the needed improvements or anything else that could make it easier for admins.

I have been using Check Point Harmony Endpoint during a POC that lasted one month.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint is stable, and it ended up being very stable with no downtime at all.

The scalability of Check Point Harmony Endpoint is very easy; it was deployed with GPOs and Ansible towards Linux servers, so it was very easy and scalable.

I previously used a different solution, which was CrowdStrike; we switched because it won the POC.

I have not seen a return on investment during my time with it, as it didn't make the cut in the POC.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Harmony Endpoint was that it ended up being expensive to license, but the licensing itself was very straightforward.

Before choosing Check Point Harmony Endpoint, I evaluated other options including CrowdStrike and Defender for Servers.

My advice to others looking into using Check Point Harmony Endpoint is to definitely pay for tuning by Check Point professional services to get assistance with setting up correctly from the first time. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Check Point Harmony Endpoint an 8.

On-premises

Other

My main use case for Check Point Antivirus is securing my company from viruses, and Check Point Antivirus is deployed across more than 500 endpoints to protect sensitive client data and meet regulatory compliance.

I use Check Point Antivirus primarily for virus protection in our day-to-day operations.

The best features Check Point Antivirus offers are ThreatCloud Intelligence, zero-day protection, and the anti-ransomware engine.

These features stand out because ThreatCloud Intelligence leverages real-time global threat data to detect and block emerging threats quickly.

Check Point Antivirus has positively impacted our organization by enhancing our security posture and operational efficiency.

The operational efficiency provided by Check Point Antivirus helps my team work more effectively through centralized management and automated threat response, which saves time for our IT team.

Check Point Antivirus could be improved by lowering resource usage and simplifying the deployment process.

The resource usage can sometimes highly utilize CPU and memory, which impacts the user experience on older or low-spec devices, and the deployment process could be simpler for our needs.

I have been using Check Point Antivirus for five years.

Check Point Antivirus could be improved by lowering resource usage and simplifying the deployment process.

The resource usage can sometimes highly utilize CPU and memory, which impacts the user experience on older or low-spec devices, and the deployment process could be simpler for our needs.

Check Point Antivirus is stable.

The scalability of Check Point Antivirus is highly scalable.

The customer support for Check Point Antivirus is good.

Positive

I did not previously use a different solution before Check Point Antivirus.

I don't have much information about the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Antivirus.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing Check Point Antivirus as there were no other solutions considered.

I have seen a return on investment from using Check Point Antivirus. It delivers solid ROI by reducing breach risk and improving endpoint visibility and control.

I don't have much information about the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Antivirus.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing Check Point Antivirus as there were no other solutions considered.

My full name is Mohammad Talib, and I work as a Senior Network Engineer at Abbott Laboratories.

I have been working in my current field for 15 years.

I found this interview to be lengthy.

On a scale of 1-10, I rate Check Point Antivirus an 8.

On-premises

Other

My main use case for Check Point Harmony Endpoint is as a cybersecurity solution.

A specific example of how I use it in my daily work is that it helped me to enhance security, protect endpoints from advanced threats, and offer strong malware prevention, data protection, and secure remote access.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint positively impacts my organization by reducing incidents.

It reduced incidents by preventing malware and minimizing security events.

The best features Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers include strong security capabilities.

The security capabilities that stand out to me include robust threat prevention, malware protection, and integrated firewall features, which I find valuable.

Another feature I find helpful is the ease of use.

I think Check Point Harmony Endpoint could be improved by reducing false positives.

Sometimes false positives occur, but I do not have more to add about the needed improvements.

I have been using Check Point Harmony Endpoint for two years.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint is stable.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint's scalability is good.

The customer support for Check Point Harmony Endpoint is good.

Positive

I did not previously use a different solution before Check Point Harmony Endpoint.

Since using Check Point Harmony Endpoint, I have seen a return on investment as it reduced the incidents and the work related to these incidents, improving our time protection.

I do not have much information about the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Harmony Endpoint.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing Check Point Harmony Endpoint.

I recommend Check Point Harmony Endpoint because it has comprehensive protection, user-friendly management, and is scalable for growth.

I am Mohammad Talib, a Senior Network Engineer at Abbott Laboratories. I have been working in my current field for 15 years.

I rate Check Point Harmony Endpoint an eight out of ten because there are always cons.

My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. I was offered a gift card or incentive for this review.

I found this interview very long and think it could be changed for the future.

On-premises and in a private cloud

Other

We work with Check Point Harmony Endpoint as partners, providing deployment services, particularly for small to medium enterprises (SMEs). We work with both small and large companies.

Endpoint protection is valuable. Stability is good, and the product is well-designed for security needs. It is scalable and offers multiple features, which justify its pricing for enterprise customers. Since security is a major concern, we do not worry about the pricing as the product has features built-in.

Support needs improvement. Currently, support is primarily via email, which leads to longer response times. Fine-tuning for applications and better support from Harmony would be helpful, especially once the environment is hardened. Better technical support would enhance the product's competitiveness.

We have been working with Check Point Harmony Endpoint for almost five years.

Stability is fine, and the product performs well in terms of security. It is considered well and good.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint is scalable, suitable for both small and large companies.

Support service needs improvement. Only email support is available, leading to delays in getting assistance.

Negative

Implementation is straightforward for smaller environments, however, requires significant fine-tuning for larger clients.

We only handle deployment and do not deal with pricing, which is taken care of by another department.

Pricing is a bit expensive but justified by the product’s features, capabilities, and scalability. It is suitable for enterprises but can be challenging to position for small to medium customers.

We recommend Check Point Harmony Endpoint; however, support needs enhancement. With improved support, it could outperform competitors. Rating based on the alone featureset is nine out of ten.