Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Adobe CQ5 vs FatWire Content Server comparison

Adobe and FatWire are both solutions in the Web Content Management category. Adobe is ranked #10, while FatWire is ranked #40. Adobe holds a 2.2% mindshare in WCM, compared to FatWire’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Adobe users are willing to recommend the solution.
Adobe CQ5
Read 1 Adobe CQ5 review
  • 430 Views
  • 372 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
FatWire Content Server
  • 47 Views
  • 32 Comparison Views
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Adobe CQ5 and FatWire Content Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Wordpress, Microsoft, Adobe and others in Web Content Management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Management Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,053 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Adobe CQ5
Ranking in Web Content Management
10th
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
FatWire Content Server
Ranking in Web Content Management
40th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Web Content Management category, the mindshare of Adobe CQ5 is 2.2%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FatWire Content Server is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

it_user680385 - PeerSpot reviewer
Brand management, Digital Transformation of organization and Most dynamic site.
Experience Management Digital Content Management Content Authoring Multisite Management Brand management, Digital Transformation of organization and Most dynamic site. Even more out of box components, UI designs. 7 Years No No No Customer Service: 9 Out of 10 Technical Support: 9 out of 10…
Read full review
Use FatWire Content Server?
Share your opinion
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

Adobe Experience Manager vs Adobe CQ5 Logo
Adobe Experience Manager vs Adobe CQ5
Compared 100% of the time
More Adobe CQ5 Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
November 2024
Adobe CQ5 reportDownload Adobe CQ5 product report
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
November 2024
FatWire Content Server reportDownload FatWire Content Server product report
 

Also Known As

CQ5
No data available
 

Learn More

Adobe
Video not available
FatWire
 

Overview

Adobe CQ web content management provides a browser-based user interface for both business and IT to create interactive, media-enriched, multichannel customer experiences to build an engaging digital presence, drive more effective campaigns and grow online customer communities. 

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

Boehringer Ingelheim
Standard Forwarding LLC, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, Agilent, Hªttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann GmbH, NTT Plala Inc., Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Universidad Aut‹noma de Madrid, ArRiyadh Development Authority, Toshiba Corporation, Tata Sky Ltd.
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
November 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Wordpress, Microsoft, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.