Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ARCON Secure Compliance Management vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

ARCON Secure Compliance Man...
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
44th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
87
Ranking in other categories
Cloud and Data Center Security (5th), Container Security (5th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (5th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (4th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (4th), Compliance Management (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of ARCON Secure Compliance Management is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

SarojMohapatra - PeerSpot reviewer
May 12, 2023
Great for productivity checking and provides good reports
We use this solution for password encryption and remote access. We are customers of ARCON This solution is good for productivity checking and provides good reports.  We've had instances where some parameters have disappeared and that is frustrating. The automation needs to be improved.  We've…
JB
Aug 13, 2024
Helps prioritize and solve issues, and provides good visibility into the threat landscape
They can provide some kind of alert when a new type of risk is there. There can be a specific type of alert showing that a new type of risk has been identified. We use Jira for pushing any changes. If any kind of integration is possible between Jira and the Singularity Cloud Native Security dashboard, it will be easier for us to track. Before approving in Jira, I can ensure that any issues in Singularity Cloud Native Security are closed. Such an integration will be helpful. Its pricing model is a little bit inflexible. Different organizations have different structures. We have multiple business units. Based on the different verticals, we have to create different subscriptions for them. If I create a new subscription and add it to Singularity Cloud Native Security, as per the current licensing model, I have to pay more for that. It should not be like that. It should be based on the number of servers. This kind of flexibility would help customers like us.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is very user friendly. There are not a lot of clicks and buttons. The tool helps me with the installations. The user can do the installation rather than having a technical guide. I also like the browsing stream. It has a good dashboard."
"Good for productivity checking."
"The support for ARCON ARSIM is very good."
"SentinelOne stands out with its responsiveness to feature requests for Singularity Cloud Security."
"It saves time, makes your environment more secure, and improves compliance. PingSafe helps with audits, ensuring that you are following best practices for cloud security. You don't need to be an expert to use it and improve your security."
"The user-friendly dashboard offers both convenience and security by providing quick access to solutions and keeping us informed of potential threats."
"It's positively affected the communication between cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams."
"PingSafe provides email alerts and ranks issues based on severity, such as high, critical, etc., that help us prioritize issues."
"The tool identifies issues quickly."
"The UI is very good."
"I did a lot of research before signing up and doing the demo. They have a good reputation as far as catching threats early on."
 

Cons

"I would love to have all the products. Currently they have all the server operating systems and network operating systems but they should have all the other devices also included, like security devices. That's what I think is missing. They should also improve the license audit part. If I want to do a license audit from this tool, I'm not able to do it right now."
"The automation needs to be improved."
"As for what can be improved, definitely pricing. Customers look for pricing and ARCON is a little more expensive than Thycotic. So the pricing model could be improved."
"In terms of ease of use, initially, it is a bit confusing to navigate around, but once you get used to it, it becomes easier."
"They need more experienced support personnel."
"There's an array of upcoming versions with numerous features to be incorporated into the roadmap. Customers particularly appreciate the service's emphasis on intensive security, especially the secret scanning aspect. During the proof of concept (POC) phase, the system is required to gather logs from the customer's environment. This process entails obtaining specific permissions, especially in terms of gateway access. While most permissions for POC are manageable, the need for various permissions may need improvement, especially in the context of security."
"I want PingSafe to integrate additional third-party resources. For example, PingSafe is compatible with Azure and AWS, but Azure AD isn't integrated with AWS. If PingSafe had that ability, it would enrich the data because how users interact with our AWS environment is crucial. All the identity-related features require improvement."
"The resolution suggestions could be better, and the compliance features could be more customizable for Indian regulations. Overall, the compliance aspects are good. It gives us a comprehensive list, and its feedback is enough to bring us into compliance with regulations, but it doesn't give us the specific objects."
"A vulnerability alert would appear, and we'd fix it, but then the same alert would return the next day."
"I would like additional integrations."
"The integration with Oracle has room for improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"PingSafe falls within the typical price range for cloud security platforms."
"Its pricing was a little less than other providers."
"I understand that SentinelOne is a market leader, but the bill we received was astronomical."
"PingSafe is affordable."
"The cost for PingSafe is average when compared to other CSPM tools."
"We have an enterprise license. It is affordable. I'm not sure, but I think we pay 150,000 rupees per month."
"PingSafe's pricing is good because it provides us with a solution."
"I wasn't sure what to expect from the pricing, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that it was a little less than I thought."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ARCON Secure Compliance Management?
We've had instances where some parameters have disappeared and that is frustrating. The automation needs to be improved.
What is your primary use case for ARCON Secure Compliance Management?
We use this solution for password encryption and remote access. We are customers of ARCON.
What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best features.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?
The price depends on the extension of the solution that you want to buy. If you want to buy just EDR, the price is less. XDR is a little bit more expensive. There are going to be different add-ons ...
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
I request that SentinelOne investigate this false positive, as SentinelOne has a higher false positive rate than other XDR solutions. While false positives are an expected part of incident response...
 

Also Known As

ARCON ARSIM, ARCON SCM
PingSafe
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

RAK Bank, AXIS Bank, Reliance Capital, Kotak Life Insurance, MTS
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ARCON Secure Compliance Management vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.