Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stableThe main reason my company decided to replace webMethods.io Integration is because of the integration capabilities in the newer versions of the tool. Whenever there is a new version of webMethods.io Integrations, there is a lot of work to be done by our company since the newer versions don't offer seamless integration. The aforementioned reason can be considered for improvement in webMethods.io Integrations. With the solution, our company has experienced sudden outages at times. The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required. Not just the cost related to licensing but also the cost of introducing new versions need improvement in the product. When you have an OS like Windows or Apple, in which some new features are installed when you restart your system, after which everything works fine, with webMethods.io Integration, the new features introduced in the tool don't just need you to stop and restart your application but expects you to update the whole application to be able to use the new functionalities, which is something that is good. My company does a business in which we have to create a complete project which costs a lot of money. In the future, I expect to not be paying a lot of money or extra work to be able to update the product, and webMethods.io Integration needs to update the product automatically.
![WSO2 Carbon [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,f_auto,q_auto,w_64/l5yr5mt0rvi35q38jtng1n80fsoi.png)
![Aurea CX Messenger vs. WSO2 Carbon [EOL] vs. webMethods.io report](https://www.peerspot.com/assets/media/images/icons/pdf-80836ec5.svg){kind=icon}
