Board vs QlikView comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Board International Logo
578 views|393 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Qlik Logo
2,564 views|2,214 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Board and QlikView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Reporting solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Board vs. QlikView Report (Updated: March 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The reporting part has been very valuable as the capabilities of the tool do not have to change graphs, change how grids are displayed, and can create reports on the fly.""What is very valuable is the ability to customize. We didn't see a solution out there that really matched exactly what our functional requirements would be. So we were able to work with New Brain, our integrator, and we were able to build from the ground up what we wanted, and I think that's pretty unique to BOARD.""we are able to easily export data. When directors need financial information, we can go in the system and export the data, then send it out so they have it ready and available. If they are not in the office, we can email it to them. In addition, all the managers are now more on top of their expenses and their budget.""It has a good set of visual elements that you can use and can explain quite well.""All staff can now see their relevant scorecards online.""The tool seems to have a lot of ways to handle scaling.""My favourite feature of BOARD is the ability to write back to the OLAP DB, as well as the Rdb, and secure user data allowing databases to be flushed and rebuilt daily.""The drill down is good for people who have that high level view, because they can do some analysis based on it."

More Board Pros →

"It is useful to use a tool like this to have a view of data at a point in time. You can extract and create little data sets that you can store, and then over time, you can have a view for tracking changes. Especially when you work with a relational database or a database that's a production database, the data is dynamic, but if you use QlikView, you can take a snapshot of different datasets. In your own time, you can then get insights and report, build, analyze, and draw whatever you need from the data, which is quite useful.""It has user-friendly data visualization features, supporting our decision-making process with its business intelligence capabilities""If you correctly use the product for your use cases, it provides value for money.""It's incredibly fast and can handle large volumes of data without slowing down our operations.""The most valuable feature of QlikView is the integration with other third-party tools.""A well designed app brings freedom of inquiry to meetings, allowing me to answer questions in real time and this has transformed progress and outputs of our monthly group meeting.""The in-memory feature gives us better insight. It's also easy to drill down into the information and select information.""Data transforming with scripting, and the associative model that lets users browse data in an easy way, are the most valuable features."

More QlikView Pros →

Cons
"The setup was a bit complex.""It's very powerful, but there is also a big learning curve. ​It should be a little more intuitive.""Building similar models entirely from scratch could be made quicker with transfer abilities between databases and capsules.""I would like to see a better Web client, where the controls work the same way as in the Windows client. I do think that the focus is now on the Web, so it should be improved upon.""​We are looking for ways to distinguish zeros versus nulls in BOARD.""One thing that I personally would like to see is additional visualization tools for visuals.""I would like to see better relationships with the partners.""It needs more export to Excel functionality. Right now, we're having to build within the cloud-based platform, as well as build within the Excel add-in, because the export to Excel is somewhat ugly."

More Board Cons →

"More/newer visualisation components need to be added.""Sometimes, dealing with complex reports requires more effort, which could be really improved.""Installation and deployment could be made easier and quicker.""Though the initial setup phase is simple, when it comes to the integration with the custom systems, the configuration and the compatibility sometimes take some more time.""They should offer the capability to directly access data from SaaS environments, as it would simplify the migration process, and while it may seem like a minor enhancement, it would be beneficial to our clients.""The solution is quite costly.""Error handling.""The user interface is old."

More QlikView Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Find a partner who will take responsibility for the implementation, and be available for support."
  • "​In terms of the pricing, it was reasonable. BOARD is not the lowest in the market, but it was reasonable for us."
  • "It is not the cheapest product on earth, but you get so much. It provides good value for money."
  • "The solution is quite expensive, if it is made cheaper then we can have more clients. I rate it four out of ten."
  • More Board Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing is a bit too high and I think licenses should be unlimited."
  • "QlikView pricing and licensing is on the high side for a small sized company, but it's competitive among its peers."
  • "Qlik is fairly high in terms of pricing."
  • "The pricing is too high compared to the other solutions on the market."
  • "It is not very expensive. I think it it is on par with other similar products on the market."
  • "The setup costs for QlikView are fair as are the yearly maintenance fees. The licensing becomes a bit more expensive and requires some planning for onboarding."
  • "It has an annual license. It is expensive as compared to other competitive tools that do more for less. In South African rands, we pay about 100,000 to 200,000 a year."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one being low price and ten being high price, I rate pricing a four."
  • More QlikView Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Reporting solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We've had several FP&A departments include Anaplan in their analytics discussions, and while BI information IS generated, the focus is generally on compiling input from various sources and… more »
    Top Answer:All the reports are prepared automatically.
    Top Answer:Sometimes, the data disappears from the product. We have had a few such cases. When I added my comments to the data, it disappeared. A technical specialist tried to restore it. It was not convenient… more »
    Top Answer:If you correctly use the product for your use cases, it provides value for money.
    Top Answer:My firm got the product at a cheap price, but in general, I believe that the product is a bit costly.
    Top Answer:Many of the features in Qlik Sense need to be available and reintroduced in QlikView. I believe many of the features have been added to QlikView after the layout containers were introduced. QlikView… more »
    Ranking
    19th
    out of 49 in Reporting
    Views
    578
    Comparisons
    393
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    470
    Rating
    7.3
    5th
    out of 49 in Reporting
    Views
    2,564
    Comparisons
    2,214
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    469
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Anaplan logo
    Compared 29% of the time.
    SAP Analytics Cloud logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    IBM Planning Analytics logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Oracle Hyperion logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Microsoft Power BI logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Tableau logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    Microsoft Power BI logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Amazon QuickSight logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    TIBCO Spotfire logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    BOARD International - headquartered in Switzerland - is a leading global provider of software for improving business results through better decision making. By unifying Business Intelligence and Corporate Performance Management into a single product, BOARD enables companies to achieve a shared vision of their performance across the entire organization, and thus a single version of the truth.

    BOARD provides seamless solutions for • Reporting & Analysis • Budgeting, Planning & Forecasting • Profitability Modelling & Optimization • Simulation & What-if-Analysis • Scorecarding & Strategy Management • Financial Consolidation. Based on visual modelling, BOARD has enabled global companies to deploy BI and CPM applications without a single line of code in a fraction of the time and cost associated with traditional solutions.

    QlikView is a Business Intelligence tool that allows you to keep tabs on all of your business-related information in a clean, clear, and easy to access database that is intuitive to build and simple to navigate. It is ideal for business owners who wish to improve overall output by creating the most productive system possible.

    Sample Customers
    Coca-Cola, Puma, Desigual, Ricoh, KPMG, H&M, Groupe SEB
    Canon, Gatorade, Amcor, Panasonic, Fila, Cambridge University Hospitals, Global Retail Bank, North Yorkshire Police department, Lanoo Group Publishers, and AonGroep Nederland.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government20%
    Healthcare Company20%
    Hospitality Company10%
    Real Estate/Law Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Wholesaler/Distributor7%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Retailer6%
    Consumer Goods Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise40%
    Large Enterprise23%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Board vs. QlikView
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Board vs. QlikView and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Board is ranked 19th in Reporting with 35 reviews while QlikView is ranked 5th in Reporting with 158 reviews. Board is rated 8.6, while QlikView is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Board writes "A stable solution with good user-experience, easy deployment but needs some improvement with engine ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QlikView writes "Useful for data visualization and business intelligence". Board is most compared with Anaplan, SAP Analytics Cloud, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Hyperion and Microsoft Power BI, whereas QlikView is most compared with Tableau, Microsoft Power BI, Amazon QuickSight, SQL Server and TIBCO Spotfire. See our Board vs. QlikView report.

    See our list of best Reporting vendors.

    We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.