Top 10 QlikView Alternatives

Vendor: Qlik

4.1 out of 5

161 reviews
92% willing to recommend

11K followers

Top QlikView Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to QlikView based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, and IBM Cognos. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Qlik Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Qlik, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Power BI

4.0 out of 5

Microsoft Power BI

4.0 out of 5

QlikView excels in data handling and self-service BI potential. In comparison, Power BI integrates seamlessly with Microsoft products and offers competitive pricing. A tech buyer might choose QlikView for analytics or Power BI for modern visualizations and cost-effectiveness.

Download Microsoft Power BI vs. QlikView Report

Pricing

QlikView's setup costs are higher than Microsoft Power BI's, which offers more cost-effective pricing, making it a budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

QlikView's setup costs are higher than Microsoft Power BI's, which offers more cost-effective pricing, making it a budget-friendly option.

Tableau

4.2 out of 5

Tableau

4.2 out of 5

QlikView excels with intuitive data discovery and fast processing, ideal for those needing high customization. In comparison, Tableau shines in creating interactive dashboards with ease, perfect for storytelling. Tech buyers may choose QlikView for integration, while Tableau offers superior visual analytics.

Download QlikView vs. Tableau Report

Pricing

QlikView has a higher setup cost compared to Tableau, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

QlikView has a higher setup cost compared to Tableau, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.

IBM Cognos

4.0 out of 5

IBM Cognos

4.0 out of 5

QlikView excels in dynamic visualizations with AQL™, ideal for in-memory processing. In comparison, IBM Cognos provides robust data modeling and OLAP tools, suiting organizations needing advanced reporting. QlikView users might face scalability issues, while IBM Cognos could improve user interface and flexibility.

Download IBM Cognos vs. QlikView Report

Pricing

QlikView has a higher setup cost compared to IBM Cognos, highlighting a key difference in their initial investment requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

QlikView has a higher setup cost compared to IBM Cognos, highlighting a key difference in their initial investment requirements.

Oracle OBIEE

3.9 out of 5

Oracle OBIEE

3.9 out of 5

QlikView uses AQL for rapid data analysis with built-in ETL and fast in-memory processing. In comparison, Oracle OBIEE provides robust support for structured and unstructured data with comprehensive security integration and enterprise-level business intelligence tools.

Download Oracle OBIEE vs. QlikView Report

Pricing

QlikView has a lower initial setup cost compared to Oracle OBIEE. However, Oracle OBIEE offers more extensive features that might justify its higher setup expense for larger enterprises.

View comparison

Pricing

QlikView has a lower initial setup cost compared to Oracle OBIEE. However, Oracle OBIEE offers more extensive features that might justify its higher setup expense for larger enterprises.

Domo

3.9 out of 5

Domo

3.9 out of 5

QlikView offers a flexible, interactive development environment with strong ETL capabilities, ideal for those needing powerful data exploration. In comparison, Domo's cloud architecture and extensive connectors make it suitable for seamless integration and ease of use for non-technical users.

Download Domo vs. QlikView Report

Pricing

QlikView has a setup cost advantage with its flexible pricing structure, whereas Domo presents a higher initial investment. This notable difference in setup costs highlights Domo's potential for scalable enterprise solutions, contrasting with QlikView's budget-friendly appeal.

View comparison

Pricing

Looker Studio

3.9 out of 5

Looker Studio

3.9 out of 5

QlikView provides analytical efficiency using Associative Query Logic, ideal for complex data manipulation. In comparison, Looker Studio facilitates seamless Google integration, perfect for quick reporting and sharing. A tech buyer might choose QlikView for power or Looker Studio for simplicity and cost-effectiveness.

Download Looker Studio vs. QlikView Report

Pricing

QlikView has a higher setup cost compared to Looker Studio, which offers a more budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

QlikView has a higher setup cost compared to Looker Studio, which offers a more budget-friendly option.

Zendesk

4.1 out of 5

Zendesk

4.1 out of 5

QlikView excels in data analysis with powerful in-memory processing and flexible data modeling, ideal for business intelligence tasks. In comparison, Zendesk enhances customer support through comprehensive ticket management and extensive customization, making it suitable for improving customer experience across multiple communication channels.

Download QlikView vs. Zendesk Report

Pricing

QlikView's setup cost is considered significant by users, while Zendesk users appreciate its more budget-friendly pricing structure.

View comparison

Pricing

QlikView's setup cost is considered significant by users, while Zendesk users appreciate its more budget-friendly pricing structure.

Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services

3.8 out of 5

Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services

3.8 out of 5

QlikView, with AQL™ technology, offers rapid interaction with data and powerful visualization. In comparison, Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services is cost-effective and integrates well with Microsoft products, appealing to businesses within that ecosystem seeking robust reporting capabilities.

Download Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services vs. QlikView Report

Pricing

QlikView has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services, making the latter a more budget-friendly option for organizations looking to reduce initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

QlikView has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services, making the latter a more budget-friendly option for organizations looking to reduce initial expenses.

SAP Crystal Reports

4.2 out of 5

SAP Crystal Reports

4.2 out of 5

QlikView's associative model and scalability handle complex analysis efficiently. In comparison, SAP Crystal Reports excels in crafting precise, customizable reports, ideal for structured presentations. Each solution addresses unique business needs, making them suitable for specific data and reporting requirements.

Download QlikView vs. SAP Crystal Reports Report

Pricing

QlikView has a higher setup cost compared to SAP Crystal Reports, which offers a more budget-friendly setup, allowing users to initiate reporting with less initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

QlikView has a higher setup cost compared to SAP Crystal Reports, which offers a more budget-friendly setup, allowing users to initiate reporting with less initial investment.

Sisense

4.4 out of 5

Sisense

4.4 out of 5

QlikView employs proprietary AQL technology for interactive data exploration without OLAP cubes, making it ideal for rapid development with in-memory processing. In comparison, Sisense offers fast deployment with an intuitive interface, excelling in data source integration with ElastiCube Manager capabilities.

Download QlikView vs. Sisense Report

Pricing

QlikView setup costs are often higher compared to Sisense, which offers a more cost-effective setup option.

View comparison

Pricing

QlikView setup costs are often higher compared to Sisense, which offers a more cost-effective setup option.

Show 2 more products

Related categories

Reporting

Embedded BI

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools