Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi iPaaS vs Devart Skyvia comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Boomi iPaaS is scalable and versatile, but pricing and configuration challenges emerge with high integration and complex tasks.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.5
Boomi iPaaS excels in low-code integration, scalability, user-friendliness, extensive connectors, and delivers high ROI with efficient deployment.
No sentiment score available
The most valuable features of Boomi are the integration capabilities, the Data Hub product, and the UDI integration.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.6
Boomi iPaaS faces challenges with limited API management, scripting, documentation, pricing, and interface, requiring performance and marketing improvements.
No sentiment score available
The integration landscape has become complex, and having a data strategy with unified data models would make integration easier for any platform, including Boomi.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Boomi iPaaS is stable with 99.99% availability, though high-volume integration issues lead some to prefer Jitterbit's interface.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.3
Boomi iPaaS support is responsive and knowledgeable; users value speed, community access, and ongoing platform improvements despite minor issues.
No sentiment score available
Seamlessly meeting SLAs and providing excellent responses to challenges and issues related to interface and data connectivity.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Boomi iPaaS offers a cost-effective, usage-based licensing model, ideal for large-scale applications, though costs can quickly increase.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (6th)
Devart Skyvia
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (31st)
 

Mindshare comparison

Boomi iPaaS and Devart Skyvia aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Boomi iPaaS is designed for Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) and holds a mindshare of 8.9%, up 8.4% compared to last year.
Devart Skyvia, on the other hand, focuses on Cloud Data Integration, holds 0.2% mindshare, up 0.2% since last year.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
Cloud Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Berniem Elfrink - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that is easy to use, cost-effective, and offers a large set of functionalities
I use Boomi AtomSphere Integration in my company to manage all types of integrations, including SAP integrations, database integrations, and other enterprise-level integrations The most valuable features of the solution are its mapping functionality and the low-code, no-code nature of the…
RH
The product works, is simple to use, and is reliable.
Error handling. This has caused me many problems in the past. When an error occurs, the event on the connection that is called does not seem to behave as documented. If I attempt a retry or opt not to display an error dialog, it does it anyway. In all fairness, I have never reported this. I think it is more important that a unique error code is passed to the error event that identifies a uniform type of error that occurred, such as ecDisconnect, eoInvalidField. It is very hard to find what any of the error codes currently passed actually mean. A list would be great for each database engine. Trying to catch an exception without displaying the UniDAC error message is impossible, no matter how you modify the parameters in the OnError of the TUniConnection object. I have already implemented the following things myself. They are suggestions rather than specific requests. Copy Datasets: This contains an abundance of redundant options. I think that a facility to copy one dataset to another in a single call would be handy. Redundancy: I am currently working on this. I have extended the TUniConnection to have an additional property called FallbackConnection. If the TUniConnection goes offline, the connection attempts to connect the FallbackConnection. If successful, it then sets the Connection properties of all live UniDatasets in the app to the FallbackConnection and re-opens them if necessary. The extended TUniConnection holds a list of datasets that were created. Each dataset is responsible for registering itself with the connection. This is a highly specific feature. It supports an offline mode that is found in mission critical/point of sale solutions. I have never seen it implement before in any DACs, but I think it is a really unique feature with a big impact. Dataset to JSON/XML: A ToSql function on a dataset that creates a full SQL Text statement with all parameters converted to text (excluding blobs) and included in the returned string. Extended TUniScript:- TMyUniScript allows me to add lines of text to a script using the normal dataset functions, Script.Append, Script.FieldByName(‘xxx’).AsString := ‘yyy’, Script.AddToScript and finally Script.Post, then Script.Commit. The AddToScript builds the SQL text statement and appends it to the script using #e above. Record Size Calculation. It would be great if UniDac could estimate the size of a particular record from a query or table. This could be used to automatically set the packet fetch/request count based on the size of the Ethernet packets on the local area network. This I believe would increase performance and reduce network traffic for returning larger datasets. I am aware that this would also be a unique feature to UniDac but would gain a massive performance enhancement. I would suggest setting the packet size on the TUniConnection which would effect all linked datasets.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle. I don't know the exact price of the product.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've us...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Boomi
Skyvia
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks
Boeing, Sony, Honda, Oracle, BMW, Samsung
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.