Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs Xshield comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Sponsored
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
87
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (6th), Cloud and Data Center Security (5th), Container Security (5th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (4th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (4th), Compliance Management (4th)
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
68
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (7th), Cloud and Data Center Security (8th), Container Management (7th), Container Security (6th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (5th), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (4th), Compliance Management (3rd)
Xshield
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
37th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Microsegmentation Software (9th)
 

Featured Reviews

Ashraf Razi - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 22, 2024
Scans all devices on a network, automates remediation, and is user-friendly
Any security incident or malware detection is reported to security administrators within a fraction of a second. Basic rules and AI detections drive this rapid response. For example, suppose a file is flagged as suspicious based on its activity and alignment with the MITRE ATT&CK framework. In that case, the system identifies the file's behavior, categorizes it according to MITRE attackers, generates AI-based responses, and provides insights to security administrators for review and further investigation. Automated remediation is highly effective, responding in mere fractions of a second to block, quarantine, or contain affected files or devices. Additionally, it can isolate endpoints from the network to prevent malware from spreading or containing compromised systems. The Ranger feature is not exclusive to Linux systems. It scans all devices on a network, providing information about the types of machines and operating systems present within that specific network environment. Workload telemetry visibility is valuable during incident response, triage, and analysis. Detailed information about the process is provided when an incident is reported, offering deep insights. For example, if a file is flagged as malware, the entire process behind its execution, including accessed files and invoked processes, is displayed. This comprehensive history effectively aids in determining file behavior and accurately classifying it as benign or malicious. The benefits of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security are immediately visible through the quick response time. The mean time to detection is under half a second. The mean time to remediate is between one and one and a half seconds. It provides an automated response, eliminating the need to block and investigate files manually. SentinelOne Singularity immediately blocks suspicious files, and subsequent investigation allows us to whitelist the file completely or maintain the block.
PJ
May 28, 2024
Enables us to detect incidents and vulnerabilities in our code with one click
We use CloudGuard to secure apps we develop in the cloud Before Check Point, we didn't have a cloud solution. Having a CNAPP solution gives us confidence that our cloud apps are secure. From day one, we saw that the product was working and detecting issues in real-time.  CloudGuard's best…
Use Xshield?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price depends on the extension of the solution that you want to buy. If you want to buy just EDR, the price is less. XDR is a little bit more expensive. There are going to be different add-ons for Singularity."
"It's a fair price for what you get. We are happy with the price as it stands."
"It is cheap."
"Singularity Cloud Workload Security's licensing and price were cheaper than the other solutions we looked at."
"It's not expensive. The product is in its initial growth stages and appears more competitive compared to others. It comes in different variants, and I believe the enterprise version costs around $55 per user per year. I would rate it a five, somewhere fairly moderate."
"Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne is cost-efficient."
"PingSafe is cost-effective for the amount of infrastructure we have. It's reasonable for what they offer compared to our previous solution. It's at least 25 percent to 30 percent less."
"For pricing, it currently seems to be in line with market rates."
"The licensing and costs are straightforward, as they have a baseline of 100 workloads (number of instances) within one license with no additional nor hidden charges. If you want to have 200 workloads under Dome9, then you need to take out two licenses for that. Also, it does not have any impact on cloud billing, as data is shared using the API call. This is well within the limit of free API calls provided by the cloud provider."
"The license for CloudGuard Posture Management is about $80 a year, and it's based on your cloud footprint, not the number of users. So you could have a million users, and it doesn't matter."
"CloudGuard is fairly priced."
"I would advise taking into account the existing number of devices and add a forecast of the number of devices to be added in the coming year or two, to obtain better pricing."
"I suggest that you pay attention to the product pricing because while there are no tricks, and the licensing model is transparent, the final numbers may surprise you."
"The licensing part still needs some work. The issue that I have is that we do not use all the services in the cloud, but sometimes, CloudGuard identifies them as an asset."
"Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is always known as a good solution but an expensive one. When you're using Cisco, Check Point, or Palo Alto, you know that you will pay more, but you know that it will work."
"It is a very straightforward licensing model that is based on the number of assets you are discovering and managing with the solution."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Security Firm
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?
The price depends on the extension of the solution that you want to buy. If you want to buy just EDR, the price is le...
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
I request that SentinelOne investigate this false positive, as SentinelOne has a higher false positive rate than othe...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

PingSafe
Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management, Dome9, Check Point CloudGuard Workload Protection, Check Point CloudGuard Intelligence
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Symantec, Citrix, Car and Driver, Virgin, Cloud Technology Partners
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP). Updated: August 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.