Checkmarx SAST vs Qwiet AI comparison

Checkmarx and Qwiet AI are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Checkmarx is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.5, while Qwiet AI is ranked #17 with an average rating of 10.0. Additionally, 100% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qwiet AI users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx SAST

Read 2 Checkmarx SAST reviews

256 Views
213 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qwiet AI

Read 1 Qwiet AI review

234 Views
162 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx SAST

Qwiet AI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Checkmarx SAST and Qwiet AI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST).

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,723 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx SAST

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

22nd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qwiet AI

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

17th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (21st), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (10th)

Featured Reviews

Cuneyt KALPAKOGLU Phd.

Founder & Chairman at Endpoint-labs Cyber Security R&D

Identifying code vulnerabilities swiftly with no need to complete the coding and offers good security

The primary use case of Checkmarx SAST is application security, specifically static application security testing. It is essential and the root of this concept I did not find measurable information about the financial benefits or return on investment. The most important competitive advantage and…

Read full review

Shivendra S.

Senior Director of Engineering - Information Security at Apna

Effectively in identify and fix bugs early in the development lifecycle

When it comes to ShiftLeft, the most valuable feature is definitely its ease of use and cost-effectiveness. Previously, security professionals had to spend a lot of time and effort running around, asking people to fix issues in their products, architectures, code, and even networks. With ShiftLeft, everything becomes robust and secure from within. Instead of relying on external measures like Web Application Firewalls (WAF) that are applied from the outside in, ShiftLeft takes a proactive approach. It helps prevent issues from arising in the first place, making it much easier for both security teams and developers. It's also cost-effective because you don't have to constantly go back, make changes to the code, and then push it again. Writing secure code from the start ensures that there are no vulnerabilities when it goes live. So, I would say the main features of ShiftLeft are its cost-effectiveness and ease of adaptability or use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most important competitive advantage and benefit is the ability to identify vulnerabilities in the source code immediately without needing to complete the coding."

"The most important feature is that Checkmarx protects our company against attacks."

"When it comes to ShiftLeft, the most valuable feature is definitely its ease of use and cost-effectiveness."

Cons

"We had some issues where Checkmarx did not recognize a vulnerability. We had to talk with the vendor, and they had to include an improvement in the tool to resolve this issue."

"We had some issues where Checkmarx did not recognize a vulnerability."

"The on-premises version is more expensive compared to the cloud version."

"Having support from senior management is crucial in making it mandatory for teams to collaborate with the security team throughout the development process."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,723 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

10%

Computer Software Company

15%

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

13%

Retailer

12%

Legal Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx SAST?

We were users in a small country, and we paid one consolidated bill for all the tools, so I don't know the specific amount for Checkmarx.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmarx SAST?

We had some issues where Checkmarx did not recognize a vulnerability. We had to talk with the vendor, and they had to include an improvement in the tool to resolve this issue.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Checkmarx SAST?

We integrated Checkmarx with our pipelines in Jenkins. We had it fully automated for static security scanning to protect our company against attacks.

See all answers

What do you like most about ShiftLeft?

When it comes to ShiftLeft, the most valuable feature is definitely its ease of use and cost-effectiveness.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ShiftLeft?

When it comes to areas of improvement for ShiftLeft, I believe it could benefit from greater support from senior management. It's important to have their involvement when it comes to architectural ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ShiftLeft?

I would highly recommend ShiftLeft. It greatly simplifies the job for both security professionals and developers. By identifying and fixing bugs earlier in the development lifecycle, it significant...

See all answers

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs Checkmarx SAST

Compared 90% of the time

Semgrep vs Checkmarx SAST

Compared 10% of the time

More Checkmarx SAST Competitors

Black Duck vs Qwiet AI

Compared 59% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Qwiet AI

Compared 41% of the time

More Qwiet AI Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

February 2025

Download Checkmarx SAST product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

February 2025

Download Qwiet AI product report

Also Known As

SAST

ShiftLeft

Overview

Checkmarx SAST provides advanced static application security testing by identifying vulnerabilities in source code. It's ideal for ISOs, security professionals, and developers striving to secure applications during development.

Checkmarx SAST is known for its powerful code scanning capabilities that integrate seamlessly into existing development environments. It supports a wide range of programming languages, which makes it applicable for diverse development projects. Some users suggest improvements in the scan performance speed and enhanced support in handling false positives to further optimize workflow efficiency.

What are the standout features of Checkmarx SAST?

Language Support: Offers broad language support catering to multiple coding frameworks.
Integration Flexibility: Seamlessly integrates with existing CI/CD pipelines and developer tools.
Comprehensive Scanning: Detects security vulnerabilities early in the development process.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive reports that help prioritize remediation efforts.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances application security by catching vulnerabilities early.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces costs associated with post-deployment issue resolution.
Developer Empowerment: Allows developers to identify and fix issues independently.
Regulatory Compliance: Assists in meeting compliance requirements efficiently.

Implemented across various industries, Checkmarx SAST supports sectors like finance, healthcare, and technology with their stringent security requirements. By integrating seamlessly into existing workflows, it ensures that applications remain secure while not disrupting industry-specific processes.

Checkmarx

Shipping secure code is painful and time-consuming – slowing down development teams and AppSec teams alike. ShiftLeft is on a mission to make vulnerabilities history. Our revolutionary Code Property Graph (CPG) enables us to seamlessly insert 10x faster code analysis, prioritized OSS vulnerability findings and real-time security education in one single SaaS platform integrated directly into modern development workflows. Combining our OWASP-benchmark dominating NG-SAST, Intelligent SCA, instant secrets detection, and contextual security education, ShiftLeft CORE code security platform turns every developer into an AppSec expert.

Qwiet AI

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

February 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,723 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.