Qwiet AI vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) comparison

Qwiet AI and Sonar are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Qwiet AI is ranked #21 with an average rating of 10.0, while Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Qwiet AI holds a 0.1% mindshare in AS, compared to Sonar’s 25.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Qwiet AI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Sonar users who would recommend it.

Qwiet AI

Read 1 Qwiet AI review

218 Views
152 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Read 114 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

36,750 Views
30,412 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Qwiet AI

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 30, 2024

SonarQube Server and ShiftLeft are competitors in the code quality and security domain. While both have strong analysis capabilities, ShiftLeft's advanced security features give it an edge.

Features: SonarQube Server offers comprehensive code quality analysis, identifies code vulnerabilities, and addresses technical debt. It integrates well with CI/CD pipelines and supports multiple languages. ShiftLeft emphasizes security with detailed insights and real-time analysis, essential for detecting and addressing vulnerabilities during development. This security focus is attractive to those prioritizing security over general code quality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube Server offers flexible deployment options, whether on-premise or cloud-based, backed by extensive community support. ShiftLeft provides cloud deployment with easy workflow integration and is noted for more responsive customer service, which is crucial for organizations needing prompt support.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube Server usually features lower setup costs and offers substantial ROI with its community edition and scalable commercial plans. ShiftLeft, though premium-priced, justifies its cost with a high ROI thanks to powerful security features that potentially reduce long-term security incident expenses. Companies focused on advanced security may find the investment in ShiftLeft worthwhile compared to SonarQube.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qwiet AI

Ranking in Application Security Tools

21st

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

17th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (10th)

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

1st

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

114

Ranking in other categories

Software Development Analytics (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Qwiet AI is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 25.6%, down from 27.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Shivendra S.

Senior Director of Engineering - Information Security at Apna

Effectively in identify and fix bugs early in the development lifecycle

When it comes to ShiftLeft, the most valuable feature is definitely its ease of use and cost-effectiveness. Previously, security professionals had to spend a lot of time and effort running around, asking people to fix issues in their products, architectures, code, and even networks. With ShiftLeft, everything becomes robust and secure from within. Instead of relying on external measures like Web Application Firewalls (WAF) that are applied from the outside in, ShiftLeft takes a proactive approach. It helps prevent issues from arising in the first place, making it much easier for both security teams and developers. It's also cost-effective because you don't have to constantly go back, make changes to the code, and then push it again. Writing secure code from the start ensures that there are no vulnerabilities when it goes live. So, I would say the main features of ShiftLeft are its cost-effectiveness and ease of adaptability or use.

Read full review

Wang Dayong

Senior Software Engineering Manager at Hill

Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages

The product provides false reports sometimes. It also fails to understand the context of the code. It reports that a line of code has issues without considering its relation with the previous line. The product should improve the report quality. While it asks us to improve the code quality, it would be good if it also suggests how to improve the quality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When it comes to ShiftLeft, the most valuable feature is definitely its ease of use and cost-effectiveness."

"The product is simple."

"SonarQube is a fantastic tool which saves us precious time."

"It assists during the development with SonarLint and helps the developer to change his approach or rather improve his coding pattern or style. That's one advantage I've seen. Another advantage is that we can customize the rules."

"The solution offers a very good community edition."

"SonarQube is designed well making it easy to use, simple to identify issues and find solutions to problems."

"The product has a friendly UI that is easy to use and understand."

"The initial setup is simple. It requires some security, but it's simple."

"SonarQube's unit test coverage and exhaustive information at the module, project, and overall code repo levels are quite good."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros

Cons

"Having support from senior management is crucial in making it mandatory for teams to collaborate with the security team throughout the development process."

"The pricing could be reduced a bit. It's a little expensive."

"I think the code security can be improved."

"There could be better integration with other products."

"I have found this solution creates more noise than competitors."

"This solution finds issues that are similar to what is found by Checkmarx, and it would be nice if the overlap could be eliminated."

"Any suggestions for potential improvements may include bill of materials functionality."

"The product's pricing could be lower."

"The software testing tool capability could improve. It does not always integrate well. You have to use a specific plugin and the plugin does not always go in Apple's applications."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I am satisfied with the pricing."

"SonarQube price is a little bit higher than Kiuwan's. Kiuwan also gives a little bit of flexibility in terms of pricing."

"We use the free version; there are no hidden costs or licensing required."

"SonarQube is a fairly affordable solution for a larger scale if you have a specific role or specific department for secure code."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable."

"Can try developer version for 14 days on the free trial."

"Compared to similar solutions, SonarQube was more accessible to us and had more benefits, with regards to size of the code base and supported languages. Apart from the Enterprise licensing fee, there are no additional costs."

"I was using the Community Edition, which is available free of charge."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

14%

Retailer

13%

Legal Firm

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ShiftLeft?

When it comes to ShiftLeft, the most valuable feature is definitely its ease of use and cost-effectiveness.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ShiftLeft?

When it comes to areas of improvement for ShiftLeft, I believe it could benefit from greater support from senior management. It's important to have their involvement when it comes to architectural ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ShiftLeft?

I would highly recommend ShiftLeft. It greatly simplifies the job for both security professionals and developers. By identifying and fixing bugs earlier in the development lifecycle, it significant...

See all answers

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

Comparisons

Black Duck vs Qwiet AI

Compared 45% of the time

Invicti vs Qwiet AI

Compared 24% of the time

More Qwiet AI Competitors

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 14% of the time

Coverity vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 12% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 12% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 8% of the time

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

February 2025

Download Qwiet AI product report

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

January 2025

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report

Download SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report

Also Known As

ShiftLeft

Sonar

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Qwiet AI

Sonar

Overview

Shipping secure code is painful and time-consuming – slowing down development teams and AppSec teams alike. ShiftLeft is on a mission to make vulnerabilities history. Our revolutionary Code Property Graph (CPG) enables us to seamlessly insert 10x faster code analysis, prioritized OSS vulnerability findings and real-time security education in one single SaaS platform integrated directly into modern development workflows. Combining our OWASP-benchmark dominating NG-SAST, Intelligent SCA, instant secrets detection, and contextual security education, ShiftLeft CORE code security platform turns every developer into an AppSec expert.

Qwiet AI

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?

Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.

What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?

Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sonar

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

January 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.