Coverity vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) comparison

Black Duck and Sonar are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Black Duck is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Black Duck holds a 8.3% mindshare in SAST, compared to Sonar’s 28.4% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Black Duck users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Sonar users who would recommend it.

Coverity

Read 42 Coverity reviews

13,201 Views
9,033 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Read 113 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

42,185 Views
34,676 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Coverity

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 30, 2024

SonarQube Server and Coverity compete in the software quality assurance domain. SonarQube seems to have the upper hand due to its open-source nature, community-driven support, and effective integration capabilities.

Features: SonarQube Server prioritizes ease of installation, features a stable platform, and provides extensive support for various tech stacks. It includes a free community edition and efficiently identifies vulnerabilities with a low false positive rate. Coverity offers low false positive rates, inline context-sensitive help, and rapid scanning, making it ideal for complex codebases.

Room for Improvement: SonarQube could improve with enhanced language support, more automation in task creation post-scan, and better enterprise reporting. Coverity struggles with high false positives, a limited user interface for non-technical users, and cumbersome reporting. Enhanced IDE integration and a more intuitive GUI would benefit users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube provides flexible deployment options, including on-premises, public cloud, and hybrid solutions, with customer support varying based on the package. Coverity mainly deploys on-premises with limited cloud options, and users often find its support lacking in immediacy and overall satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube is cost-efficient with its free community edition, accessible for smaller teams, providing significant ROI through open-source availability. Coverity's pricing is high due to user licenses, making it less accessible for smaller companies and impacting its perceived ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Coverity vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coverity vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,563 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coverity

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Coverity is 8.3%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 28.4%, down from 28.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Md. Shahriar Hussain

Information Security Analyst at Banglalink

Offers impressive reporting features with user-friendliness and high scalability

The solution can be easily setup but requires heavy integration due to the multiple types of port and programming languages involved. Comparing the resource requirements of the solution I would say it can be installed effortlessly. I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. A professional needs some pre-acquired knowledge to manage Coverity's deployment process, but the local solution partners provide support well enough for trouble-free deployment. The overall deployment process of Coverity took around two and a half hours in our organization. The deployment duration depends upon the operating system and resources including high-end RAM and CPU processors.

Read full review

Wang Dayong

Senior Software Engineering Manager at Hill

Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages

The product provides false reports sometimes. It also fails to understand the context of the code. It reports that a line of code has issues without considering its relation with the previous line. The product should improve the report quality. While it asks us to improve the code quality, it would be good if it also suggests how to improve the quality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides reports about a lot of potential defects."

"This solution is easy to use."

"Considering the analysis part and the benchmarking process involving the product that my company carried out, the solution is good for finding bugs and violations"

"Coverity is quite stable and we haven’t had any issues or any downtime."

"The tool as it is can be used for code quality improvement."

"It's pretty stable. I rate the stability of Coverity nine out of ten."

"The solution has helped to increase staff productivity and improved our work significantly by approximately 20 percent."

"I encountered a bug with Coverity, and I opened a ticket. Support provided me with a workaround. So it's working at the moment, or at least it seems to be."

More Coverity pros

"This has improved our organization because it has helped to find Security Vulnerabilities."

"We use this solution for qualitative coding. We make use of the SonarLint plugin as well as the dashboard."

"The static code analysis is very good."

"All the features of the solution are quite good."

"Improve the code coverage and evaluates the technical steps and percentage of code being resolved."

"It helps our developers work more efficiently as we can identify things in a code prior to it being pushed to where it needs to go."

"This solution has helped with the integration and building of our CICD pipeline."

"Issue Explanations: Documentation with detailed samples. Helps in growing technical knowledge and re-writing logic to conforming solutions."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros

Cons

"Its price can be improved. Price is always an issue with Synopsys."

"Some features are not performing well, like duplicate detection and switch case situations."

"The solution is a bit complex to use in comparison to other products that have many plugins."

"The quality of the code needs improvement."

"When I put my code into Coverity for scanning, the code information of the product is in the system. The solution could be improved by providing a SBOM, a software bill of material."

"Coverity could improve the ease of use. Sometimes things become difficult and you need to follow the guides from the website but the guides could be better."

"We'd like it to be faster."

"The solution could use more rules."

More Coverity cons

"We called support and complained but have not received any information as we use the free version. We had to fix it on our own and could not escalate it to the tool's developer."

"The solution could improve by providing more advanced technologies."

"Ease of use/interface."

"SonarQube needs to improve its support model. They do not work 24/7, and they do not provide weekend support in case things go wrong. They only have a standard 8:00 am to 5:00 pm support model in which you have to raise a support ticket and wait. The support model is not effective for premium customers."

"The pricing could be reduced a bit. It's a little expensive."

"The handling of the contents of Docker container images could be better."

"We've been using the Community Edition, which means that we get to use it at our leisure, and they're kind enough to literally give it to us. However, it takes a fair amount of effort to figure out how to get everything up and running. Since we didn't go with the professional paid version, we're not entitled to support. Of course that could be self-correcting if we were to make the step to buy into this and really use it. Then their technical support would be available to us to make strides for using it better."

"Monitoring is a feature that can be improved in the next version."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Coverity is very expensive."

"The price is competitive with other solutions."

"It is expensive."

"I rate Coverity's price a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"The pricing is on the expensive side, and we are paying for a couple of items."

"Depending on the usage types, one has to opt for different types of licenses from Coverity, especially to be able to use areas like report viewing or report generation."

"The licensing fees are based on the number of lines of code."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to other products."

More Coverity pricing and cost advice

"Compared to similar solutions, SonarQube was more accessible to us and had more benefits, with regards to size of the code base and supported languages. Apart from the Enterprise licensing fee, there are no additional costs."

"There is both a free and licensed version. The free version has limitations on development languages and support."

"SonarQube price is a little bit higher than Kiuwan's. Kiuwan also gives a little bit of flexibility in terms of pricing."

"On the pricing side, it's 3,000 Euros for 1 million lines of code."

"The product’s price is lower than Veracode’s price."

"It's an open-source solution, with no additional costs."

"I was using the Community Edition, which is available free of charge."

"People can try the free licenses and later can seek buying plugins/support, etc. once they started liking it."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

32%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

What do you like most about Coverity?

The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coverity?

I do not know about the pricing.

See all answers

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Klocwork vs Coverity

Compared 7% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Coverity

Compared 6% of the time

Veracode vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

More Coverity Competitors

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 12% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 9% of the time

Snyk vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 4% of the time

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coverity

January 2025

Download Coverity product report

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

December 2024

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report

Download SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report

Also Known As

Synopsys Static Analysis

Sonar

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Black Duck

Sonar

Overview

Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts.

Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports more than 20 languages and 200 frameworks and templates.

Black Duck

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?

Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.

What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?

Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sonar

Sample Customers

SAP, Mega International, Thales Alenia Space

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Coverity vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

January 2025

Free Report: Coverity vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Find out what your peers are saying about Coverity vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coverity vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.