Coverity vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) comparison

Black Duck and Sonar are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Black Duck is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.9, while Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Black Duck holds a 8.4% mindshare in SAST, compared to Sonar’s 28.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Black Duck users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Sonar users who would recommend it.

Coverity

Read 40 Coverity reviews

14,794 Views
9,950 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Read 113 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

46,116 Views
37,416 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Coverity

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 30, 2024

SonarQube Server and Coverity compete in the software quality assurance domain. SonarQube seems to have the upper hand due to its open-source nature, community-driven support, and effective integration capabilities.

Features: SonarQube Server prioritizes ease of installation, features a stable platform, and provides extensive support for various tech stacks. It includes a free community edition and efficiently identifies vulnerabilities with a low false positive rate. Coverity offers low false positive rates, inline context-sensitive help, and rapid scanning, making it ideal for complex codebases.

Room for Improvement: SonarQube could improve with enhanced language support, more automation in task creation post-scan, and better enterprise reporting. Coverity struggles with high false positives, a limited user interface for non-technical users, and cumbersome reporting. Enhanced IDE integration and a more intuitive GUI would benefit users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube provides flexible deployment options, including on-premises, public cloud, and hybrid solutions, with customer support varying based on the package. Coverity mainly deploys on-premises with limited cloud options, and users often find its support lacking in immediacy and overall satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube is cost-efficient with its free community edition, accessible for smaller teams, providing significant ROI through open-source availability. Coverity's pricing is high due to user licenses, making it less accessible for smaller companies and impacting its perceived ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Coverity vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Coverity vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,528 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Coverity

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Coverity is 8.4%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 28.7%, up from 28.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Md. Shahriar Hussain

Cyber Security Chartered Engineer at Banglalink

May 3, 2024

Offers impressive reporting features with user-friendliness and high scalability

The solution can be easily setup but requires heavy integration due to the multiple types of port and programming languages involved. Comparing the resource requirements of the solution I would say it can be installed effortlessly. I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. A professional needs some pre-acquired knowledge to manage Coverity's deployment process, but the local solution partners provide support well enough for trouble-free deployment. The overall deployment process of Coverity took around two and a half hours in our organization. The deployment duration depends upon the operating system and resources including high-end RAM and CPU processors.

Read full review

Wang Dayong

Senior Software Engineering Manager at Hill

May 10, 2023

Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages

We use the product to review our software codes. We have integrated the product to review our new delivery code When we deliver a code, the solution scans the code and reports whether the code has bugs or any other vulnerability issues. Thus the solution helps us identify issues and improve the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a scalable solution."

"The most valuable feature of Coverity is its software security feature called the Checker. If you share some vulnerability or weakness then the software can find any potential security bug or defect. The code integration tool enables some secure coding standards and implements some Checkers for Live Duo. So we can enable secure coding and Azure in this tool. So in our software, we can make sure our software combines some industry supervised data."

"The interface of Coverity is quite good, and it is also easy to use."

"Coverity gives advisory and deviation features, which are some of the parts I liked."

"The most valuable feature is the integration with Jenkins."

"The security analysis features are the most valuable features of this solution."

"I encountered a bug with Coverity, and I opened a ticket. Support provided me with a workaround. So it's working at the moment, or at least it seems to be."

"The ability to scan code gives us details of existing and potential vulnerabilities. What really matters for us is to ensure that we are able to catch vulnerabilities ahead of time."

More Coverity pros

"The most valuable features are the segregation containment and the suspension of product services."

"It's a great product. If you are in a hurry and just want to focus on the functional requirements of any kind of project, SonarQube is highly helpful. It enables the developers to code securely. SonarQube has a Community edition, which is open source and free. There are also three proprietary or paid versions: Enterprise edition, Data Center edition, and Developer edition."

"The most valuable feature is the security hotspot feature that identifies where your code is prone to have security issues."

"It is a very good tool for analysis and security vulnerability checking."

"It assists during the development with SonarLint and helps the developer to change his approach or rather improve his coding pattern or style. That's one advantage I've seen. Another advantage is that we can customize the rules."

"The product has a friendly UI that is easy to use and understand."

"SonarQube's unit test coverage and exhaustive information at the module, project, and overall code repo levels are quite good."

"This has improved our organization because it has helped to find Security Vulnerabilities."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros

Cons

"The solution could use more rules."

"The tool needs to improve its reporting."

"Coverity concerns its dashboards and reporting."

"There should be additional IDE support."

"Sometimes, vulnerabilities remain unidentified even after setting up the rules."

"SCM integration is very poor in Coverity."

"Coverity could improve the ease of use. Sometimes things become difficult and you need to follow the guides from the website but the guides could be better."

"I would like to see integration with popular IDEs, such as Eclipse."

More Coverity cons

"New plug-ins should be integrated into SonarCloud to give more flexibility to the product."

"This is a well-rounded solution, however, some features could be made available on the free version. The price of the solution could be reduced."

"It should be user-friendly."

"The tool needs to be more compatible with C/C++ language"

"The reporting is good, but I am not able to download a specific report as a PDF, so downloading reports is something that should be looked at."

"There isn't a very good enterprise report."

"I am not very pleased with the technical debt computation."

"We did have some trouble with the LDAP integration for the console."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Coverity is quite expensive."

"The solution is affordable."

"Coverity is very expensive."

"The tool's price is somewhere in the middle. It's neither cheap nor expensive. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"This is a pretty expensive solution. The overall value of the solution could be improved if the price was reduced. Licensing is done on an annual basis."

"Offers varying prices for different companies"

"I would rate Coverity's pricing as a nine out of ten. It's already very expensive, and it's a problem for us to get more licenses due to the price. The pricing model has some good aspects - for example, a personal license gives access to all languages without code limitations, which is better than some competitors. However, it's still a lot of money for us to spend."

"I would rate the tool's pricing a one out of ten."

More Coverity pricing and cost advice

"Some of the plugins that were previously free are not free now."

"A low cost long-term solution for non-critical situations."

"The price of the solution could be reduced."

"The price point on SonarQube is good."

"The price of this solution is more expensive than competitors. However, it works better than competitors."

"The free version of SonarQube does everything that we need it to."

"This solution is free."

"This is open source."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,528 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

32%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

What do you like most about Coverity?

The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coverity?

We do it yearly.

See all answers

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Klocwork vs Coverity

Compared 7% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Coverity

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Coverity

Compared 6% of the time

Veracode vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Coverity

Compared 4% of the time

More Coverity Competitors

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 17% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 12% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 9% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 9% of the time

Snyk vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 5% of the time

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coverity

October 2024

Download Coverity product report

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

October 2024

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report

Download SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report

Also Known As

Synopsys Static Analysis

Sonar

Learn More

Black Duck

Sonar

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Black Duck

Sonar

Overview

Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts.

Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports more than 20 languages and 200 frameworks and templates.

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?

Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.

What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?

Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sample Customers

SAP, Mega International, Thales Alenia Space

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Coverity vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

October 2024

Free Report: Coverity vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Find out what your peers are saying about Coverity vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,528 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coverity vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.