Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL] vs Proofpoint Insider Threat Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Proofpoint Insider Threat Management provides efficient video recording, intuitive interface, integration capabilities, accurate reporting, and robust investigation features.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Users are satisfied with Proofpoint Insider Threat Management's stability, experiencing no disruptions and finding the current version sufficient.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Proofpoint Insider Threat Management suits smaller environments; larger companies find scalability issues, needing better implementation and database adjustments.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Proofpoint Insider Threat Management needs improvements in issue management, Unix documentation, mainframe support, scalability, and enhanced SIEM integration.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Proofpoint's customer service and technical support are highly rated, with effective assistance, especially in complex SSL agent issues.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco CMX Analytics [EOL]
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Proofpoint Insider Threat M...
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
User Activity Monitoring (3rd), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (16th)
 

Featured Reviews

EV
Good for IoT devices and occupation-calculations, but there are issues with stability and it is not user-friendly
Many areas need improvement, but stability has some issues. We don't always know what the configurations are all about. They change the configuration possibilities all of the time and we don't always get the same software results. In the next release, I would like to see it easier to use.
it_user223041 - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to implement and configure. Ticketing and incident workflow can be improved.
Real time recording and investigation of suspected policy infractions. Ease of implementation and configuration. Knowledge, availability and responsiveness of ObserveIT technical team to support our implementation Has allowed us to provide level of assurance of compliance to complicated business…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Activity Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats
In addition to responsesfrom Xavier Suriol and reviewer1324719, also consider ObserveIT from Proofpoint.
Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats
Hello All,I hope you had a merry Christmas.In this case it is as simple as it is.Just take Proofpoint ObserveIT - many companies in the public and financial sector have been using it for years.By ...
 

Also Known As

Cisco Connected Mobile Experiences, Cisco Connected Mobile Experiences Analytics, CMX Analytics
ObserveIT
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Coca Cola, Allianz, Premiere League, Xerox, AIG, Cigna, Starbucks, Revlon, Toshiba, Nissan and more.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Proofpoint and others in User Activity Monitoring. Updated: November 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.