Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cognizant ADPART vs OpenText Silk Central comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
OpenText Silk Central is praised for its responsive, knowledgeable customer service, efficient technical support, and quick response times.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Users suggest improvements for OpenText Silk Central in reporting, integration, setup, test environment support, performance, and navigation.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
OpenText Silk Central is praised for scalability, flexibility, robust performance, supporting diverse projects, extensive collaboration, and seamless system integration.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
<p>OpenText Silk Central provides enterprise pricing options, balancing initial costs with comprehensive features, support, and significant return on investment.</p>
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
OpenText Silk Central is reliable, handles extensive workloads, scales with business growth, and provides stable performance with minimal downtime.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
OpenText Silk Central excels in test management, tool integration, reporting, ease of use, customization, automation, and effective large-scale test case management.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cognizant ADPART
Ranking in Test Management Tools
15th
Ranking in Test Design Automation
2nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Silk Central
Ranking in Test Management Tools
21st
Ranking in Test Design Automation
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Cognizant ADPART is 1.3%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Silk Central is 1.6%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Use Cognizant ADPART?
Share your opinion
it_user685080 - PeerSpot reviewer
A powerful platform and strong technical support help us to make the right decisions
We are primarily interested in improving the flexibility to customize parts of the tool. At this point, we feel that the customization is bad. For example, we would like to be able to automatize internal projects. We would like like to see the visibility improved, and want to perform certain tests faster. We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end. This is very important to us. In terms of usability and the interface, a few small improvements can lead to a lot of benefits. The interface is good but can be improved. The section on managing requirements for testing has to be improved. This is an old feature that has not been updated at the same rate as the rest of the tool.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
16%
Insurance Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Also Known As

ADPART
Micro Focus Silk Central, Borland Silk Central, Silk Central
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.