We performed a comparison between Denodo and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Overall, the product works quite well and has a good set of features."
"The most valuable feature is Data Catalogs."
"Denodo's best features are its performance, easy data transformation, and the job scheduler."
"The data abstraction is the most valuable feature."
"One thing that we have noticed is that when you have a BI tool, you end up building a lot of the logic in the BI tool, but as a company, every company wants to be tool agnostic because today, you could be in the Qlik Sense, and tomorrow, you may decide to go with Tableau or something else that is there. If you have put a lot of logic within the tool, transitioning or moving away from one BI tool to another tool becomes a very intensive process. By keeping the logic in Denodo, you can move to any tool."
"The most valuable features of Denodo are the extraction option for adapters, and there are many things for the views, that are cached. Denodo is not storing the data, it looks first to tune the query, and these things are for the agents."
"It is a go-to tool for data virtualization. The virtualization and data catalog are the features of why we chose Denodo."
"The most valuable feature is the performance. Denodo is very useful, especially in this huge pharma environment. I've found that older SAP solutions were very tightly coupled to each other, which resulted in data restrictions. Getting data from different sources was tough and tedious. Compared to these old solutions, Denodo is very easy to work with for the analytical team. Now that we've implemented this virtualization layer, we are capable of getting the data very smoothly. We implemented a very small unit, but the performance and integration have been very good."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"The tool is very capable and offers a high performance. The tool supports batch processing and ETL processing."
"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."
"Denodo has some difficulty supporting large numbers of records."
"Documentation needs to be improved"
"We occasionally have some integration issues that we need to work through."
"Performance management could be improved."
"Sometimes, Windows-related functions do not work properly in Denodo. The analytic functions in SQL do not work properly."
"Lacks integrations with AWS, GCP and the like."
"The feature that you have to connect on LDAP needs improvement."
"It would be beneficial to make sure that the team that will be using Denodo has some kind of training on how to use the product at least a month beforehand, and there could even be some kind of feedback or Q&A sessions to go along with the training. If Denodo were able to provide this kind of training, it would be very helpful to users in insurance and banking companies because the staff are typically older and not always technically-minded."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."
"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"The stability could be better."
"It should give better control over account management."
"Better documentation, in particular with respect to the initial setup, would be helpful."
"Mule should have better B2B integration."
Denodo is ranked 8th in Cloud Data Integration with 29 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 41 reviews. Denodo is rated 7.8, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Denodo writes "Saves our underwriters' time with data virtualization, but could provide more learning resources". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Denodo is most compared with Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Delphix, Informatica PowerCenter and Palantir Foundry, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Infor ION. See our Denodo vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.