We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I am impressed with the tool's UI and analytics."
"One special aspect of Azure Logic Apps is its easy integration of various applications, especially when connectors are already available. For instance, there are connectors for database applications and systems like SAP. You can drag and drop the connectors to complete your integration quickly."
"What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that you can run a workflow or do a high-level process orchestration, then you can call the other function and fulfill the process. For example, if you want to update a customer, you first need to get the customer's phone number and simulate the steps of the process, then Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can orchestrate that process."
"Easy to use and is able to integrate with other Azure-based environments."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a nine out of ten, with ten being easy to set up."
"We mainly used it to integrate SAP, ServiceNow, and different third-party APIs with the front end."
"If we are working with a service-oriented architecture, as an architect as a baseline, it supports us very well in terms of expandability, and the kind of robustness it brings, especially with its serverless nature is fabulous."
"Logic Apps helped reduce complexity or development time. For example, if we get documents in the form of images, we can use Logic Apps to extract information from those images. This simplifies our efforts compared to originally using Microsoft APIs to do the same task."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."
"The platform's cloud integration capabilities are good."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."
"The tool is very capable and offers a high performance. The tool supports batch processing and ETL processing."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."
"The documentation could be better. I think that's the only thing that was causing a normal level of problems. In terms of the documentation, it came from Cosmos DB and an additional product from Microsoft Azure."
"The solution could add an AI version to make it easier for people."
"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can improve by continually updating the connectors to make them better."
"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could have more customization options for connectors."
"Not all connectors are readily available, though. There are two types: managed connectors and app connectors. Some connectors require you to provide a username and password to connect to platforms like SharePoint or Salesforce. Due to security constraints, some users may prefer not to use these connectors. Instead, they might opt for the HTTP connector."
"Especially when using a function or a parameter, that could be easier as that's not very well-documented, and it's not very clear from the tool itself how to use it."
"The product needs improvement in getting direct access to the code and versioning."
"The solution lacks sufficient connectors."
"Mule should have better B2B integration."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"I would like to see some data integration and automation."
"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced...Mule Anypoint Platform can get too complex for non-technical people."
"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 31 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 41 reviews. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Boomi iPaaS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform, Workato and webMethods.io Integration, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and Azure Data Factory. See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
