Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo

Top 10 Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
4.0 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
208 followers
Post review

Top Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft Azure Logic Apps based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, webMethods.io, and SAP Cloud Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps surpasses its competitors by offering robust integration capabilities, ease of use, and scalability, empowering businesses to automate workflows effortlessly and connect diverse applications, data, and services with its advanced cloud-based solutions.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
4.0 out of 5
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is ideal for complex enterprise-grade integrations with superior features and robust API management, appealing to larger businesses. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers ease of use, rapid deployment, and a cost-efficient model, attracting startups and companies seeking straightforward solutions.
Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform involves higher setup costs than Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment required for these platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform involves higher setup costs than Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment required for these platforms.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
webMethods.io
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
webMethods.io
4.0 out of 5
webMethods.io appeals to buyers with its competitive pricing and exceptional support. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers advanced features that justify its higher cost. webMethods.io emphasizes ease of integration, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps excels in extensive connectors and scalability, addressing enterprise requirements.
Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. webMethods.io Report
webMethods.io has an initial setup cost that is user-friendly, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps has a more complex pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
webMethods.io has an initial setup cost that is user-friendly, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps has a more complex pricing structure.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
SAP Cloud Platform
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
SAP Cloud Platform
4.0 out of 5
SAP Cloud Platform offers robust integration tools and compatibility with the SAP ecosystem. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps excels in feature-rich connectivity and easy workflow automation. SAP provides strong SAP-specific integrations, whereas Azure appeals to a broader range of businesses with faster deployment and flexible pricing.
Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. SAP Cloud Platform Report
SAP Cloud Platform has a moderate setup cost, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps has a lower setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP Cloud Platform has a moderate setup cost, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps has a lower setup cost.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Oracle Integration Cloud Service
3.9 out of 5
Oracle Integration Cloud Service is preferred for robust support and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps excels in feature set despite higher costs. Oracle integrates seamlessly with Oracle applications, while Azure offers cross-platform flexibility. Each provides distinct advantages depending on use case.
Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service Report
Oracle Integration Cloud Service has a higher initial setup cost, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly for small businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Integration Cloud Service has a higher initial setup cost, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly for small businesses.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
SnapLogic
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
SnapLogic
3.9 out of 5
SnapLogic excels in pricing, customer service, and ease of deployment, offering pre-built connectors and streamlined data flows. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is favored for its extensive features like enterprise integration and complex workflows, justifying its higher cost with comprehensive support and rich capabilities.
Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. SnapLogic Report
SnapLogic has a high initial setup cost, whereas Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
SnapLogic has a high initial setup cost, whereas Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers a more cost-effective setup.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Boomi iPaaS
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Boomi iPaaS
3.9 out of 5
Dell Boomi excels in multi-tenant cloud capabilities with strong hybrid deployment and an extensive connector library. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps focuses on quick integrations and scalable solutions suitable for large enterprises through its extensive Azure integration and serverless pay-as-you-go model.
Download Boomi iPaaS vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Report
Boomi iPaaS has a more competitive setup cost, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps may involve a higher initial investment, highlighting key differences in pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Boomi iPaaS has a more competitive setup cost, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps may involve a higher initial investment, highlighting key differences in pricing.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite
4.2 out of 5
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is recognized for robust EDI capabilities and comprehensive integration solutions. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps excels in Azure services integration and flexibility. SEEBURGER offers extensive industry-specific templates, while Azure Logic Apps provides a simpler setup process and a wide range of connectors.
Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Report
The SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite has a high initial setup cost, whereas Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers a lower upfront cost.
View comparison
Pricing
The SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite has a high initial setup cost, whereas Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers a lower upfront cost.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Workato
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Workato
4.2 out of 5
Workato offers extensive pre-built connectors and powerful automation, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps excels in seamless integration with Microsoft services and versatility. In comparison, Workato is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive service. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers scalability and feature richness, justifying higher costs.
Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Workato Report
Workato has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, making Azure a more budget-friendly option. Workato’s setup process, though more expensive, may offer more advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Workato has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, making Azure a more budget-friendly option. Workato’s setup process, though more expensive, may offer more advanced features.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
MuleSoft Composer
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
MuleSoft Composer
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is preferred for its easier setup and robust customer service. In comparison, MuleSoft Composer offers a superior feature set. Azure's extensive pre-built connectors cater to diverse needs, whereas MuleSoft excels with advanced API management. Azure's simpler deployment contrasts with MuleSoft needing more effort.
Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer Report
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps typically has a lower initial setup cost compared to MuleSoft Composer, which can have a higher initial setup expense due to the comprehensive features it offers.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps typically has a lower initial setup cost compared to MuleSoft Composer, which can have a higher initial setup expense due to the comprehensive features it offers.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Talend Data integration
4.3 out of 5
Talend Data Integration offers extensive integration and robust data management, appealing to users who need comprehensive data handling. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps provides seamless cloud integrations and powerful automation, ideal for those looking for diverse connectivity. Talend's flexible deployment contrasts with Azure's cloud-first approach.
Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Talend Data integration Report
Talend Data Integration has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, which offers a more affordable initial setup. Talend’s setup is more complex, while Logic Apps' simpler setup appeals to cost-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Talend Data Integration has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, which offers a more affordable initial setup. Talend’s setup is more complex, while Logic Apps' simpler setup appeals to cost-conscious users.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Jitterbit Harmony
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Jitterbit Harmony
4.3 out of 5
Jitterbit Harmony excels in robust data mapping and user-friendly design, making it ideal for simpler tasks with straightforward deployment. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps stands out with cloud-native integrations and extensive connectors, handling complex workflows but requiring better debugging tools and advanced support documentation.
Download Jitterbit Harmony vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Report
Jitterbit Harmony's setup cost is moderate and straightforward, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers a more flexible cost structure tailored for scalability, presenting a clear choice based on initial investment and long-term usage needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Jitterbit Harmony's setup cost is moderate and straightforward, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers a more flexible cost structure tailored for scalability, presenting a clear choice based on initial investment and long-term usage needs.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
TIBCO Cloud Integration
4.2 out of 5
TIBCO Cloud Integration offers robust, flexible capabilities ideal for varied integrations, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps provides extensive connectors and advanced automation. In comparison, Azure Logic Apps delivers comprehensive features and seamless Microsoft integration, whereas TIBCO Cloud Integration excels in cost-effectiveness and customer support.
Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration Report
TIBCO Cloud Integration has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, which offers a more affordable initial setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
TIBCO Cloud Integration has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, which offers a more affordable initial setup expense.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps excels in cost-effectiveness and customer assistance, making it ideal for businesses seeking affordability and support. In comparison, Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services delivers advanced integration features, appealing to those prioritizing functionality. Both have room for improvement in workflow handling and platform stability, respectively.
Download Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Report
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers a low upfront setup cost, while Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services requires a higher initial investment for configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers a low upfront setup cost, while Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services requires a higher initial investment for configuration.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Amazon AppFlow
1 out of 5
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Amazon AppFlow
1 out of 5
Amazon AppFlow integrates data from sources like Salesforce, Snowflake, and SAP to destinations such as S3 and Redshift. Users value its automation, security, and minimal coding. Despite its ease of use, better documentation, more third-party integration, and performance improvements are needed. Enhanced data mapping and transformation features are also desired.
View comparison

Related categories

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
Message Queue (MQ) Software
Business-to-Business Middleware