Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Oracle Integration Cloud Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Integration Cloud Se...
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is 15.7%, up from 13.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is 8.3%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Ritu-Raj - PeerSpot reviewer
Influenced cost savings by approximately seventy to eighty percent
I have worked on multiple platforms in this space, like MuleSoft, Oracle, Intel, Microsoft, and Dell Boomi. However, Azure Logic Apps is the easiest and most transparent in terms of its operations, licensing cost, and scaling. Being in Azure, the use of the Azure ecosystem becomes quite native with Logic Apps.
Divya Prakash - PeerSpot reviewer
An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain
Dealing with the large file sizes has occasionally been a challenge, though we have found workarounds. But dealing with large file sizes could be easy in integrations. I have also come across schema files where headers, footers, and bodies are there, but it's not a valid schema. None of the MSCAs are defined properly. In such cases, we have to think of multiple workarounds, such as splitting or merging. But this is a standard requirement for organizations, so custom solutions should be provided. There are cases when the systems don't expect additional MSCAs, or they expect headers, footers, or tags with different values. But this is not a proper XML. So if we are dealing with XML conversions, mapping, and integrations, we have to do some custom work. These are solutions that Oracle can provide.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I like the ability within Logic Apps to design the workbooks through the portal with minimal code."
"Azure Logic Apps has influenced cost savings by approximately seventy to eighty percent in many cases and is generally 30% to 40% cheaper than any comparable services in this space."
"The product integration with Active Directory and detailed execution tracking for debugging are the most valuable features."
"The prebuilt connectors available for SAP are really useful."
"We can write external features and transfer the data using JPIMs securely which has been most valuable."
"The product’s most valuable feature is integration."
"Logic Apps helped reduce complexity or development time. For example, if we get documents in the form of images, we can use Logic Apps to extract information from those images. This simplifies our efforts compared to originally using Microsoft APIs to do the same task."
"Its integration capabilities are great, allowing connectivity with various applications and services."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service integrates well and is user-friendly. If you are not a developer or ops engineer you can still use the solution with ease. You do not need to have developers' knowledge, you can easily adapt and learn quickly to integrate the services. They have good documentation."
"The dashboard provided by Oracle Integration Cloud for monitoring and error handling is very intuitive."
"It's easy to build an integration and make changes to it."
"The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value."
"We mainly use the solution's ICS component."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the SFTP adapters, file adapters, and risk adapters, that we use in everyday projects."
"Technical support responds quickly."
 

Cons

"The stability of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is stable. However, we have had some issues in the past. They do resolve issues that arise from new releases."
"It would be beneficial to have less code and tighter integration between different cloud services."
"The main issue is performance, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. Performance-wise, that's the only thing Microsoft should focus on."
"I find the current interface useful, but I could see how others would want the UI bits that are used for creating Logic Apps to be simplified."
"The pricing could be improved."
"The product needs improvement in getting direct access to the code and versioning."
"The business rules engine is still not fully developed, and it would be very helpful to see improvements here."
"The solution lacks sufficient connectors."
"There are a few features that we noticed are not in the cloud. There are some improvements needed. One example is the graphical user interface that needs to improve, it could be easier to use."
"Oracle needs to ensure that some of the most commonly used types of consumption or services are bundled—for every industry."
"Now the platform is not built in a way that you can define."
"The solution doesn't currently have a fully fledged workflow feature like they have in OIM."
"It would be helpful if there were more tutorials or documentation to learn about Oracle Integration Cloud Service."
"The ease of configuration is something that could be improved. The mapping is a bit complex, so configuration is not very easy for a new user."
"Our client was quite concerned about the cost, which is something that could be reduced."
"With JSON, if the tool provides support similar to XML, then it would be helpful."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In my experience, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is not a cheap solution."
"The product is not cheap. I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."
"Compared to the prices of Mulesoft, the price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is low."
"The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive."
"The pricing is not expensive."
"I rate Microsoft Azure Logic Apps's pricing a seven out of ten."
"The cost of the solution could be cheaper."
"Its price depends on the number of transactions, storage capacity, etc., defining if the subscription will be monthly or weekly."
"Its pricing is relatively lower than other vendors."
"Pricing is not on the economic side since it is a tool for enterprise-sized companies."
"In the case of Oracle Integration Cloud, costs can be "predictable" as far as the platform and infrastructure are concerned."
"The price of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is reasonable to start with, but when you scale it becomes expensive."
"The price of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is good. It is reasonable and is priced well for the market segment. The model they use is on a per-package unit and we have a two-year subscription."
"Oracle uses a universal credit model for OCI. Clients commit to an annual budget and can choose which products to use and build during their contract period. Billing is based on consumption - you're only billed for the products you use."
"The solution is cost-effective."
"The price is cheaper than all other cloud integration providers."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
32%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Educational Organization
40%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
Microsoft provides a reliable solution, but it is considered expensive compared to others. Pricing is dynamic, based on scalability and usage. It is comparable to IBM MQ in cost.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs further development in consistency and durability, particularly for handling larger data volumes beyond 1 MB. Additionally, I have concerns about disaster recovery ...
What's the difference between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)?
Oracle Integration Cloud Service has a fairly easy initial setup, and Oracle offers initial support and guidance for those who might find the setup to be challenging. There are complications that c...
What do you like most about Oracle Integration Cloud Service?
Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers a lot of adaptors.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Integration Cloud Service?
It is not really a high price for the value it gives. However, when you start doing the customization, it’s a bit expensive because I need to start provisioning other services before deployment. So...
 

Also Known As

Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps
Oracle ICS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems
Calix, Avaya, Land Lakes, Leader, PWC, Vale
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.