Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Glue vs Oracle Integration Cloud Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.5
Oracle Integration Cloud Service's support has mixed reviews, noting delays, inconsistencies, and expertise issues, but high-priority issues get fast assistance.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.0
Oracle Integration Cloud Service needs better AI integration, enhanced tools, reduced costs, improved support, comprehensive documentation, and flexible pricing.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.8
Oracle Integration Cloud Service scales well and is versatile, but has data size limitations and occasional performance issues.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers predictable pricing with various models and discounts, but costs can increase with extensive customization.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.1
Oracle Integration Cloud Service is stable and reliable, with occasional downtime and performance issues, rated 7-10 out of 10.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.2
Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers scalable, user-friendly integration with robust error handling, pre-built APIs, and low-code capabilities for ease of use.
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Glue
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (1st)
Oracle Integration Cloud Se...
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

AWS Glue and Oracle Integration Cloud Service aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. AWS Glue is designed for Cloud Data Integration and holds a mindshare of 24.8%, up 24.6% compared to last year.
Oracle Integration Cloud Service, on the other hand, focuses on Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), holds 9.6% mindshare, down 11.2% since last year.
Cloud Data Integration
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Ajaykumar Myana - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management
We no longer had to worry much about infrastructure management because AWS Glue is serverless, and Amazon takes care of the underlying infrastructure. This allowed us to focus on the code and application logic without concerns about scaling, CPU management, or handling fluctuations in flow. The serverless nature of Glue jobs relieved us from these infrastructure-related worries.
Divya Prakash - PeerSpot reviewer
An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain
Dealing with the large file sizes has occasionally been a challenge, though we have found workarounds. But dealing with large file sizes could be easy in integrations. I have also come across schema files where headers, footers, and bodies are there, but it's not a valid schema. None of the MSCAs are defined properly. In such cases, we have to think of multiple workarounds, such as splitting or merging. But this is a standard requirement for organizations, so custom solutions should be provided. There are cases when the systems don't expect additional MSCAs, or they expect headers, footers, or tags with different values. But this is not a proper XML. So if we are dealing with XML conversions, mapping, and integrations, we have to do some custom work. These are solutions that Oracle can provide.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
Educational Organization
41%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How do you select the right cloud ETL tool?
AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.
How does Talend Open Studio compare with AWS Glue?
We reviewed AWS Glue before choosing Talend Open Studio. AWS Glue is the managed ETL (extract, transform, and load) from Amazon Web Services. AWS Glue enables AWS users to create and manage jobs in...
What are the most common use cases for AWS Glue?
AWS Glue's main use case is for allowing users to discover, prepare, move, and integrate data from multiple sources. The product lets you use this data for analytics, application development, or ma...
What's the difference between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)?
Oracle Integration Cloud Service has a fairly easy initial setup, and Oracle offers initial support and guidance for those who might find the setup to be challenging. There are complications that c...
What do you like most about Oracle Integration Cloud Service?
Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers a lot of adaptors.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Integration Cloud Service?
It is not really a high price for the value it gives. However, when you start doing the customization, it’s a bit expensive because I need to start provisioning other services before deployment. So...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Oracle ICS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

bp, Cerner, Expedia, Finra, HESS, intuit, Kellog's, Philips, TIME, workday
Calix, Avaya, Land Lakes, Leader, PWC, Vale
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Informatica, Salesforce and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.