We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."AWS Glue's most valuable features are the data catalog, including crawlers and tables, and Glue Studio, which means you don't have to use custom code."
"AWS Glue is quite better than other tools, but you have to learn it properly before you start using it."
"The solution is serverless so it allows us to transform data while optimizing the cost and performance of Spark jobs."
"The solution is highly user-friendly, and its features are easy to use. The new addition of AWS Glue Data Catalog is also very beneficial, making the tool even more helpful for its users."
"The solution integrates well with other AWS products or services."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Glue is that it provides a GUI format with a drag-and-drop feature."
"Data catalog and triggers are the two best features for me. AWS Glue has its own data catalog, which makes it great and really easy to use. Triggers are also really good for scheduling the ETL process."
"It is a stable and scalable solution."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service is a really good product and the ROI is very good with it. It lowers development time. A development cycle that may have taken a year without Oracle Integration Cloud Service can drop down to three or four months with it."
"It's very easy to get started on the solution. It's also easy to maintain, scale, and integrate according to cost factors."
"The dashboard provided by Oracle Integration Cloud for monitoring and error handling is very intuitive."
"OIC offers a number of pre-built technology and SaaS adapters for high productivity for a wide range of target systems, both in-house via agents and cloud/SaaS, via a very flexible range of interfaces."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is its performance."
"In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files."
"The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value."
"Provides various ways to secure services as well as providing extensive support."
"I haven't looked into Glue in terms of seeking out flaws. I've not come across missing features."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"Glue could perform better. It sometimes takes too long to test a Glue job. Google Cloud Platform offers more Python scripts than AWS."
"In terms of improvement, the performance of AWS Glue could be faster."
"AWS Glue is more costly compared to other tools like Airflow."
"On occasion, the solution's dashboard reports that a project failed due to runtime but it actually succeeded."
"If there's a cluster-related configuration, we have to make worker notes, which is quite a headache when processing a large amount of data."
"The product has only a few built-in transformations."
"The solution's customer service could be better."
"In designer mode, sometimes the browser closure or other unknown issues can cause strange behavior, which requires a restart."
"They need to make tools framework available for implementation partners"
"It would be helpful if there were more tutorials or documentation to learn about Oracle Integration Cloud Service."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve file handling. Currently, our real-time file polling limitation is 10 MB, if that size can be increased it would be helpful. For example, increasing the size from 10 MB to 1 GB."
"While most of the adapters are available through Oracle Integration Cloud Services, they do not have a lot of features. I would like to see some enrichment in this area and for the solution to go deeper into the applications and upgrade the adapters."
"Make it more similar to the on-premises features. For example, if you can edit the code directly rather than just dragging and dropping, or if you can edit the examples by going into the background, and one-click migration, I'd like to see included in the next release."
"Oracle-based automation blueprints for the majority of the integrations would be helpful to have in a future release."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, SSIS and Confluent, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle GoldenGate, Azure Data Factory and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.