Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Glue vs Oracle Integration Cloud Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
AWS Glue is praised for cost-effectiveness and efficiency, though some seek alternatives due to budget constraints.
Sentiment score
8.3
Oracle Integration Cloud Service provides substantial ROI through autonomous services that reduce development time and operational overhead.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
AWS Glue's helpful customer service and documentation are praised, despite occasional support delays and noted technical limitations.
Sentiment score
5.5
Oracle Integration Cloud Service's support has mixed reviews, noting delays, inconsistencies, and expertise issues, but high-priority issues get fast assistance.
AWS's documentation is reliable, and careful reference often resolves missed upgrade details.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
AWS Glue is praised for its scalable, serverless architecture but criticized for hidden costs; users rate scalability highly.
Sentiment score
7.8
Oracle Integration Cloud Service scales well and is versatile, but has data size limitations and occasional performance issues.
It is beneficial to upgrade jobs, and we conduct extensive testing in development before migrating to production.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
AWS Glue is stable and reliable, performing well with large datasets and integrating smoothly with major platforms.
Sentiment score
8.1
Oracle Integration Cloud Service is stable and reliable, with occasional downtime and performance issues, rated 7-10 out of 10.
 

Room For Improvement

AWS Glue faces challenges with slow start-up, high costs, limited language support, and user interface shortcomings needing improvements.
Oracle Integration Cloud Service needs better AI integration, enhanced tools, reduced costs, improved support, comprehensive documentation, and flexible pricing.
Learning the latest functionalities is crucial, and while challenging, it is a vital part of staying current and ensuring an efficient ETL process.
 

Setup Cost

AWS Glue's pay-as-you-go model offers flexibility but can be costly, especially with extensive EC2 usage and support subscriptions.
Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers predictable pricing with various models and discounts, but costs can increase with extensive customization.
Costing depends on resource usage, and cost optimization may involve redesigning jobs for flexibility.
 

Valuable Features

AWS Glue offers efficient data cataloging, integration, scalability, cost-effectiveness, and user-friendly ETL features with serverless architecture.
Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers scalable, user-friendly integration with robust error handling, pre-built APIs, and low-code capabilities for ease of use.
For ETL, I feel the performance is excellent. If I create jobs in a standard way, the performance is great, and maintenance is also seamless.
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Glue
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (1st)
Oracle Integration Cloud Se...
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

AWS Glue and Oracle Integration Cloud Service aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. AWS Glue is designed for Cloud Data Integration and holds a mindshare of 24.8%, up 24.9% compared to last year.
Oracle Integration Cloud Service, on the other hand, focuses on Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), holds 9.2% mindshare, down 11.3% since last year.
Cloud Data Integration
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Muthuvel Sivaraman - PeerSpot reviewer
Handles a huge volume of data and is serverless, but it can be considered costly by some users
We use Amazon's services to provide technical support for the product. If you want to have support, Oracle and others offer a single support, and other tools have a direct support window. For Amazon, we need to pay 10 percent of my billing amount for the tool to get support services. Whether to raise a support ticket or not is an issue since ten percent is a huge amount. My company ends up using all the options without help from support. It is very difficult for any common man to understand why there is a need to pay ten percent for support. If I find an issue in the product, and I need to get support from AWS to fix it, then I need to pay ten percent of the tool's bill amount to Amazon. AWS is a very tricky tool because everything is evolving nowadays. AWS engineers are getting hired from other places, and even after that, if I am not getting any technical support, then things will be very nasty. There are some good engineers who help users outside the normal support cycle, but it doesn't meet their needs. I rate the technical support a four out of ten.
Arun Andavar Nagarajan - PeerSpot reviewer
Integrates well , reasonably priced, feature-rich, and has helpful technical support
In terms of improvement, debugging and error handling, Oracle can be much more user-friendly on this, because clients must provide a much more error handling framework, which is a monitoring framework, that is much better. The current one has some level of monitoring, but then there are retrying mechanisms, automatically retrying mechanisms and error recovery mechanisms. Those things need to be greatly improved; they have something, but it is very basic. The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful. Resilience can be enhanced. The migration flow has to improve. They have some kind of agent connecting with the on-premise systems. We need to simplify the process of connecting with non-cloud applications. If you have to connect to some servers from this cloud to non-cloud, that is a bit of a hassle. They now have something called an agent for those, but they can simplify it, and the error frameworks can be implemented much more effectively.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
Educational Organization
44%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How do you select the right cloud ETL tool?
AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.
How does Talend Open Studio compare with AWS Glue?
We reviewed AWS Glue before choosing Talend Open Studio. AWS Glue is the managed ETL (extract, transform, and load) from Amazon Web Services. AWS Glue enables AWS users to create and manage jobs in...
What are the most common use cases for AWS Glue?
AWS Glue's main use case is for allowing users to discover, prepare, move, and integrate data from multiple sources. The product lets you use this data for analytics, application development, or ma...
What's the difference between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)?
Oracle Integration Cloud Service has a fairly easy initial setup, and Oracle offers initial support and guidance for those who might find the setup to be challenging. There are complications that c...
What do you like most about Oracle Integration Cloud Service?
Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers a lot of adaptors.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Integration Cloud Service?
It is not really a high price for the value it gives. However, when you start doing the customization, it’s a bit expensive because I need to start provisioning other services before deployment. So...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Oracle ICS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

bp, Cerner, Expedia, Finra, HESS, intuit, Kellog's, Philips, TIME, workday
Calix, Avaya, Land Lakes, Leader, PWC, Vale
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Informatica, Salesforce and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: January 2025.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.