No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs TIBCO Cloud Integration comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TIBCO Cloud Integration
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
21st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.5
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is 4.0%, down from 12.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO Cloud Integration is 1.9%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps4.0%
TIBCO Cloud Integration1.9%
Other94.1%
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Gayatri Dhawade - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Architect at Abcl
Has supported seamless integration flows while requiring improvement in cost transparency
Assessing the ease of connecting disparate systems using Microsoft Azure Logic Apps connectors is simple because we have a Standard Operating Process. If we want to use Logic Apps, we just reserve the instances as per our requirement. Even for Blob storage, we use tokenized endpoints that give us access to this storage account, making it secure. At API Gateway, we have policies that help us implement encryption and decryption. Request parameters are mapped automatically, converted to SOAP, XML, or JSON as needed in different formats. We utilize its monitoring capabilities; Event Grids are used for logging events. Additionally, we have implemented a retry mechanism and are using Azure Monitor for end-to-end request tracing.
NarendraThota - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President of Technology Services at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
A product that is easy to install and offers good stability to users
The API part of the solution is an area in the solution where improvements are made since I see that TIBCO is currently trying to revamp its tool by focusing more on redesigning it. There was a tool called Mashery, which is an API management tool that was acquired by TIBCO. TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex. I think in the UK, one of the major telecom providers for whom I had done the infrastructure setup uses TIBCO Cloud Integration. Basically, TIBCO Cloud Integration is a bit difficult to install and manage the platform, but I feel there are improvements in the tool's latest version, especially on the API management side. Instead of moving to the higher version and converting the older version of TIBCO Cloud Integration or the legacy platform covered under TIBCO, they still use it because the architecture is completely different, and the components that the product has are completely different from what the new version of the product offers, making it one of the major reasons why TIBCO is coming up with a new version of the product that will be released in the upcoming year. The legacy platform of TIBCO will run on the cloud directly. TIBCO plans to develop a unified tool that is supported on the cloud and in an on-premises environment.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best thing about Logic Apps is actually its ability to create a solution in a matter of hours."
"If we are working with a service-oriented architecture, as an architect as a baseline, it supports us very well in terms of expandability, and the kind of robustness it brings, especially with its serverless nature is fabulous."
"The product is very good, as I have seen no downtime in the two years of use."
"The workflow in Logic Apps enables integrating multiple applications."
"It's easy to use, and it's stable."
"The solution has plenty of good valuable features and a plethora of services, and Azure is comprehensive which can meet business strategy standards."
"Logic Apps is valuable because my team uses it for integrating SaaS tool sets."
"I am impressed with the tool's UI and analytics."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"I am really impressed by TIBCO's integration of any level of complexity."
"I like that it is a very good integration tool with many other things; TIBCO is very good for cloud integration."
"The initial setup was straightforward and because we often work with one of the most interesting companies in integration in Italy, what the program offers is absolutely outstanding."
 

Cons

"An area of improvement I've encountered is related to the number of connectors available in Logic Apps. While there are many connectors, I found that the "send email" connector may not work as expected, and one has to rely on Office 365 plugins or other alternatives. This could enhance user experience, especially when considering the additional overhead and licensing requirements associated with Office 365. It also needs to improve security features."
"A room for improvement in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that it's expensive. Every step is going to cost you money, so if someone is not doing the steps carefully, at the end of the day, it will cost a lot of money. Each time you execute a step, the cost will depend on how much you use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, and how many workflow steps you have. Each time a step needs to be executed, there'll be a cost added to your bill. If the developer isn't careful with how he uses the solution, this can blow up the cost. What I'd like to see in the next release of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is for the cost and security to be better."
"The solution should include more connectors."
"The support I have received is mixed because in some cases they are accurate, and in others, it was me doing the groundwork and giving feedback for the agent to finally tell me there is an issue in their larger services."
"Additionally, enhancing scalability features, such as implementing queuing mechanisms for high-concurrency scenarios, would greatly improve its utility."
"It would be helpful if the vendor could provide more data connectors."
"Pricing and handling asynchronous processes are the two main areas that need improvement."
"The solution lacks sufficient connectors."
"TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex."
"The deployment was rather complicated."
"It is an extremely powerful solution, but it is very expensive, even though it only offers adequate functionality."
"Integrations could be better. Although integration is good, we have faced some block issues."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Logic Apps is cheap with its pay-as-you-go model. We only pay for usage time, no license fees. So Logic Apps is good in that aspect."
"The product is quite cheap."
"It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use."
"It is a cost-efficient platform."
"The licensing is cheaper because, compared to other services, Azure services are much cheaper and affordable."
"Compared to the prices of Mulesoft, the price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is low."
"In my experience, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is not a cheap solution."
"Its price depends on the number of transactions, storage capacity, etc., defining if the subscription will be monthly or weekly."
"We don't pay for a license."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
911,493 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Construction Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Construction Company
28%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Consumer Goods Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise24
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
Regarding the cost, I find Microsoft Azure Logic Apps to be reasonable; it is not expensive.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
My experience with their pricing indicates that pricing is complicated to understand and costly. There should be some cost reduction. Currently, I don't have any use case beyond what the readily av...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
The primary use case for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps in my system is mainly API Gateway; it serves as an interface between the external world and our entire ERP landscape. Any request which flows in...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems
NASA, T-Mobile, EagleView, Air France KLM, Caesars Entertainment
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
911,493 professionals have used our research since 2012.