Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs TIBCO Cloud Integration comparison

Microsoft and TIBCO are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while TIBCO is ranked #19. Microsoft holds a 6.5% mindshare in PaaS, compared to TIBCO’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Read 41 Microsoft Azure Logic Apps reviews

3,001 Views
3,001 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

TIBCO Cloud Integration

Read 3 TIBCO Cloud Integration reviews

872 Views
488 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

TIBCO Cloud Integration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

TIBCO Cloud Integration and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps are integration platforms with distinct strengths. TIBCO Cloud Integration tends to be more cost-effective and provides better customer service. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is noted for its strong feature set and seamless integration with Azure services.

Features: TIBCO Cloud Integration is recognized for its flexibility, robust connector library, and real-time data processing. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is known for intuitive workflow automation, seamless integration with Azure products, and a strong overall feature set. TIBCO focuses on flexibility in complex integrations, while Azure Logic Apps emphasizes automation and Azure synergy.

Room for Improvement: TIBCO Cloud Integration could benefit from better documentation, a simplified learning curve, and easier onboarding. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs enhanced debugging tools, improved error reporting, and advanced troubleshooting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TIBCO Cloud Integration is praised for its ease of deployment, though it has a steep learning curve. It receives high ratings for customer service. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps also has an easy deployment process due to its integration with Azure services, but its customer service feedback indicates a need for more responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: TIBCO Cloud Integration is seen as cost-effective with a good ROI and reasonable setup costs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps has a higher perceived value due to its features, but its pricing is considered complex. TIBCO offers better upfront pricing, while Azure Logic Apps is valued for its extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,180 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TIBCO Cloud Integration

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is 6.5%, down from 13.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO Cloud Integration is 2.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps	6.5%
TIBCO Cloud Integration	2.1%
Other	91.4%

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Gayatri Dhawade

Technical Architect at Abcl

Has supported seamless integration flows while requiring improvement in cost transparency

Assessing the ease of connecting disparate systems using Microsoft Azure Logic Apps connectors is simple because we have a Standard Operating Process. If we want to use Logic Apps, we just reserve the instances as per our requirement. Even for Blob storage, we use tokenized endpoints that give us access to this storage account, making it secure. At API Gateway, we have policies that help us implement encryption and decryption. Request parameters are mapped automatically, converted to SOAP, XML, or JSON as needed in different formats. We utilize its monitoring capabilities; Event Grids are used for logging events. Additionally, we have implemented a retry mechanism and are using Azure Monitor for end-to-end request tracing.

Read full review

NarendraThota

Vice President of Technology Services at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

A product that is easy to install and offers good stability to users

The API part of the solution is an area in the solution where improvements are made since I see that TIBCO is currently trying to revamp its tool by focusing more on redesigning it. There was a tool called Mashery, which is an API management tool that was acquired by TIBCO. TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex. I think in the UK, one of the major telecom providers for whom I had done the infrastructure setup uses TIBCO Cloud Integration. Basically, TIBCO Cloud Integration is a bit difficult to install and manage the platform, but I feel there are improvements in the tool's latest version, especially on the API management side. Instead of moving to the higher version and converting the older version of TIBCO Cloud Integration or the legacy platform covered under TIBCO, they still use it because the architecture is completely different, and the components that the product has are completely different from what the new version of the product offers, making it one of the major reasons why TIBCO is coming up with a new version of the product that will be released in the upcoming year. The legacy platform of TIBCO will run on the cloud directly. TIBCO plans to develop a unified tool that is supported on the cloud and in an on-premises environment.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If we are working with a service-oriented architecture, as an architect as a baseline, it supports us very well in terms of expandability, and the kind of robustness it brings, especially with its serverless nature is fabulous."

"Logic Apps is good for helping us run our access on a cloud environment like Azure. It's much easier, more reliable, and better to maintain."

"The workflow in Logic Apps enables integrating multiple applications."

"I like the ability within Logic Apps to design the workbooks through the portal with minimal code."

"The product's initial setup phase is something that I don't think is complex because once we start using it, it becomes simple."

"Logic Apps is valuable because my team uses it for integrating SaaS tool sets."

"Easy to use and is able to integrate with other Azure-based environments."

"The product has efficient connectors."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pros

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"I am really impressed by TIBCO's integration of any level of complexity."

"I like that it is a very good integration tool with many other things. TIBCO is very good for cloud integration"

Cons

"In Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, we use Liquid templates, and I feel it can be improved as it does not support all the features that our company wants to use during any complex mapping when we might have to go for custom coding."

"The only thing is, sometimes, when we need a specific connector, it requires an enterprise or paid version. If it were possible to provide the most commonly used connectors for pulling data from different sources free of cost, that would be really nice."

"The solution could add an AI version to make it easier for people."

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs further development in consistency and durability, particularly for handling larger data volumes beyond 1 MB."

"Especially when using a function or a parameter, that could be easier as that's not very well-documented, and it's not very clear from the tool itself how to use it."

"There could be custom code for the product's components."

"The support I have received is mixed because in some cases they are accurate, and in others, it was me doing the groundwork and giving feedback for the agent to finally tell me there is an issue in their larger services."

"The main issue is performance, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. Performance-wise, that's the only thing Microsoft should focus on."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps cons

"The deployment was rather complicated."

"Integrations could be better. Although integration is good, we have faced some block issues."

"TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If we are comparing to other public cloud vendors, such as Amazon or Google Cloud platform, I wouldn't say that it's expensive. However, when we're comparing between a host such as GoDaddy or Digital Ocean, then it's a bit on the expensive side."

"It is a cost-efficient platform."

"The product is quite cheap."

"The licensing is cheaper because, compared to other services, Azure services are much cheaper and affordable."

"In my experience, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is not a cheap solution."

"It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use."

"The pricing is not expensive."

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is a little bit expensive, and that is why you use it only for certain types of scenarios."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pricing and cost advice

"We don't pay for a license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,180 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Consumer Goods Company

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	24

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

Regarding the cost, I find Microsoft Azure Logic Apps to be reasonable; it is not expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

My experience with their pricing indicates that pricing is complicated to understand and costly. There should be some cost reduction. Currently, I don't have any use case beyond what the readily av...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Boomi iPaaS vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 18% of the time

Workato vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 10% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 8% of the time

SnapLogic vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Competitors

Boomi iPaaS vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 17% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 8% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 8% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 7% of the time

More TIBCO Cloud Integration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

January 2026

Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps product report

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

February 2026

Download TIBCO Cloud Integration product report

Also Known As

Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps

No data available

Overview

Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

Microsoft

TIBCO Cloud Integration, built on open-source technologies, can connect cloud, on-premises, and IoT edge applications. It has a drag-and-drop and API-led design approach and a deploy-anywhere model.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems

NASA, T-Mobile, EagleView, Air France KLM, Caesars Entertainment

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration

January 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,180 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.