Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs TIBCO Cloud Integration comparison

Microsoft and TIBCO are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while TIBCO is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 15.2% mindshare in PaaS, compared to TIBCO’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Read 38 Microsoft Azure Logic Apps reviews

4,472 Views
2,348 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

TIBCO Cloud Integration

Read 3 TIBCO Cloud Integration reviews

147 Views
124 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

TIBCO Cloud Integration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

TIBCO Cloud Integration and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps are integration platforms with distinct strengths. TIBCO Cloud Integration tends to be more cost-effective and provides better customer service. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is noted for its strong feature set and seamless integration with Azure services.

Features: TIBCO Cloud Integration is recognized for its flexibility, robust connector library, and real-time data processing. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is known for intuitive workflow automation, seamless integration with Azure products, and a strong overall feature set. TIBCO focuses on flexibility in complex integrations, while Azure Logic Apps emphasizes automation and Azure synergy.

Room for Improvement: TIBCO Cloud Integration could benefit from better documentation, a simplified learning curve, and easier onboarding. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs enhanced debugging tools, improved error reporting, and advanced troubleshooting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TIBCO Cloud Integration is praised for its ease of deployment, though it has a steep learning curve. It receives high ratings for customer service. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps also has an easy deployment process due to its integration with Azure services, but its customer service feedback indicates a need for more responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: TIBCO Cloud Integration is seen as cost-effective with a good ROI and reasonable setup costs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps has a higher perceived value due to its features, but its pricing is considered complex. TIBCO offers better upfront pricing, while Azure Logic Apps is valued for its extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TIBCO Cloud Integration

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is 15.2%, up from 13.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO Cloud Integration is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Ritu-Raj

Chief Engineer - Cloud | Azure | Integration at Numerics Cloud

Influenced cost savings by approximately seventy to eighty percent

I have worked on multiple platforms in this space, like MuleSoft, Oracle, Intel, Microsoft, and Dell Boomi. However, Azure Logic Apps is the easiest and most transparent in terms of its operations, licensing cost, and scaling. Being in Azure, the use of the Azure ecosystem becomes quite native with Logic Apps.

Read full review

NarendraThota

Vice President of Technology Services at SAge IT inc

A product that is easy to install and offers good stability to users

The API part of the solution is an area in the solution where improvements are made since I see that TIBCO is currently trying to revamp its tool by focusing more on redesigning it. There was a tool called Mashery, which is an API management tool that was acquired by TIBCO. TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex. I think in the UK, one of the major telecom providers for whom I had done the infrastructure setup uses TIBCO Cloud Integration. Basically, TIBCO Cloud Integration is a bit difficult to install and manage the platform, but I feel there are improvements in the tool's latest version, especially on the API management side. Instead of moving to the higher version and converting the older version of TIBCO Cloud Integration or the legacy platform covered under TIBCO, they still use it because the architecture is completely different, and the components that the product has are completely different from what the new version of the product offers, making it one of the major reasons why TIBCO is coming up with a new version of the product that will be released in the upcoming year. The legacy platform of TIBCO will run on the cloud directly. TIBCO plans to develop a unified tool that is supported on the cloud and in an on-premises environment.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps are the triggering based on certain events. You can trigger a Logic App and put your logic behind it and take certain actions. The actions could be anything based on the business logic. For example, if you say something happens, an order comes in, and the order can sit in one of the Azure services. Whenever an order comes in, the Logic App can go look and trigger an event. You can write your logic inside your Logic App and it works similar to a workflow."

"Logic Apps is good for helping us run our access on a cloud environment like Azure. It's much easier, more reliable, and better to maintain."

"What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that you can run a workflow or do a high-level process orchestration, then you can call the other function and fulfill the process. For example, if you want to update a customer, you first need to get the customer's phone number and simulate the steps of the process, then Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can orchestrate that process."

"If there's something that isn't possible, you can write some code and call that code from a Logic App."

"One special aspect of Azure Logic Apps is its easy integration of various applications, especially when connectors are already available. For instance, there are connectors for database applications and systems like SAP. You can drag and drop the connectors to complete your integration quickly."

"The design is highly beneficial. It functions as a sandbox environment."

"Logic Apps helped reduce complexity or development time. For example, if we get documents in the form of images, we can use Logic Apps to extract information from those images. This simplifies our efforts compared to originally using Microsoft APIs to do the same task."

"The workflow in Logic Apps enables integrating multiple applications."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pros

"I am really impressed by TIBCO's integration of any level of complexity."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"I like that it is a very good integration tool with many other things. TIBCO is very good for cloud integration"

Cons

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can improve by continually updating the connectors to make them better."

"Especially when using a function or a parameter, that could be easier as that's not very well-documented, and it's not very clear from the tool itself how to use it."

"An area for improvement for Azure Logic Apps could be enhancing its ability to handle large datasets. When dealing with extensive data, we often have to use Azure Data Factory, which is mostly limited to scheduled jobs."

"It would be beneficial to have less code and tighter integration between different cloud services."

"The scalability could be improved."

"There could be custom code for the product's components."

"In Logic Apps, it supports AJAX and jQuery as commands to filter out to input the parameter. But regular expressions in general aren't supported well. So, I recommend that Logic Apps could be enhanced by supporting regular expressions (RegEx) more comprehensively ."

"The pricing could be improved."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps cons

"Integrations could be better. Although integration is good, we have faced some block issues."

"The deployment was rather complicated."

"TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to the prices of Mulesoft, the price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is low."

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could be costly if a user isn't careful. The costs associated with the solution could still be improved."

"The product is not cheap. I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"The tool's cost can vary depending on your specific use case. Generally, it's considered cheaper, but the price depends on how much you use it and which features you need. Initially, there was a consumption-based pricing model, but now Microsoft offers a standard tier. Microsoft encourages users to migrate from the consumption model to the standard one by 2025. The pricing is a monthly fixed cost, depending on your usage needs."

"The cost of the solution could be cheaper."

"Logic Apps is cheap with its pay-as-you-go model. We only pay for usage time, no license fees. So Logic Apps is good in that aspect."

"The pricing is okay. It's not highly priced. It's in the medium range."

"The product pricing aligns well with the value and capabilities offered by Azure services."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pricing and cost advice

"We don't pay for a license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

39%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

The pricing is very clean and transparent. You can start small and pay only for what you use. There are no upfront licensing costs or contracts you are bound to.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

The business rules engine is still not fully developed, and it would be very helpful to see improvements here.

See all answers

What do you like most about TIBCO Cloud Integration?

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TIBCO Cloud Integration?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TIBCO Cloud Integration?

I mainly use TIBCO Cloud Integration for iPaaS platforms, SaaS connectors, and SaaS connectivity that you have. The solution can be deployed on the cloud and on an on-premises model, so you can go ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Boomi iPaaS vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 29% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 16% of the time

Workato vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 10% of the time

MuleSoft Composer vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

February 2025

Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps product report

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

January 2025

Download TIBCO Cloud Integration product report

Also Known As

Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps

No data available

Overview

Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

Microsoft

TIBCO Cloud Integration, built on open-source technologies, can connect cloud, on-premises, and IoT edge applications. It has a drag-and-drop and API-led design approach and a deploy-anywhere model.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems

NASA, T-Mobile, EagleView, Air France KLM, Caesars Entertainment

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration

January 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.