Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs TIBCO Cloud Integration comparison

Microsoft and TIBCO are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while TIBCO is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 14.4% mindshare in PaaS, compared to TIBCO’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Read 40 Microsoft Azure Logic Apps reviews
  • 3,141 Views
  • 3,141 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
TIBCO Cloud Integration
Read 3 TIBCO Cloud Integration reviews
  • 501 Views
  • 165 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

TIBCO Cloud Integration and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps are integration platforms with distinct strengths. TIBCO Cloud Integration tends to be more cost-effective and provides better customer service. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is noted for its strong feature set and seamless integration with Azure services.

Features: TIBCO Cloud Integration is recognized for its flexibility, robust connector library, and real-time data processing. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is known for intuitive workflow automation, seamless integration with Azure products, and a strong overall feature set. TIBCO focuses on flexibility in complex integrations, while Azure Logic Apps emphasizes automation and Azure synergy.

Room for Improvement: TIBCO Cloud Integration could benefit from better documentation, a simplified learning curve, and easier onboarding. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs enhanced debugging tools, improved error reporting, and advanced troubleshooting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TIBCO Cloud Integration is praised for its ease of deployment, though it has a steep learning curve. It receives high ratings for customer service. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps also has an easy deployment process due to its integration with Azure services, but its customer service feedback indicates a need for more responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: TIBCO Cloud Integration is seen as cost-effective with a good ROI and reasonable setup costs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps has a higher perceived value due to its features, but its pricing is considered complex. TIBCO offers better upfront pricing, while Azure Logic Apps is valued for its extensive features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TIBCO Cloud Integration
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
15th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.5
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is 14.4%, up from 14.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO Cloud Integration is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Ritu-Raj - PeerSpot reviewer
Influenced cost savings by approximately seventy to eighty percent
I have worked on multiple platforms in this space, like MuleSoft, Oracle, Intel, Microsoft, and Dell Boomi. However, Azure Logic Apps is the easiest and most transparent in terms of its operations, licensing cost, and scaling. Being in Azure, the use of the Azure ecosystem becomes quite native with Logic Apps.
Read full review
NarendraThota - PeerSpot reviewer
A product that is easy to install and offers good stability to users
The API part of the solution is an area in the solution where improvements are made since I see that TIBCO is currently trying to revamp its tool by focusing more on redesigning it. There was a tool called Mashery, which is an API management tool that was acquired by TIBCO. TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex. I think in the UK, one of the major telecom providers for whom I had done the infrastructure setup uses TIBCO Cloud Integration. Basically, TIBCO Cloud Integration is a bit difficult to install and manage the platform, but I feel there are improvements in the tool's latest version, especially on the API management side. Instead of moving to the higher version and converting the older version of TIBCO Cloud Integration or the legacy platform covered under TIBCO, they still use it because the architecture is completely different, and the components that the product has are completely different from what the new version of the product offers, making it one of the major reasons why TIBCO is coming up with a new version of the product that will be released in the upcoming year. The legacy platform of TIBCO will run on the cloud directly. TIBCO plans to develop a unified tool that is supported on the cloud and in an on-premises environment.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Logic Apps is valuable because my team uses it for integrating SaaS tool sets."
"Connectors are very useful for streamlining data integration tasks."
"It's easy to use, and it's stable."
"The solution's best feature is that it is compatible with the cloud and has many connectors and third-party adapters."
"It's quite similar to Power Optima, but I use it mainly to integrate with databases, and it works well for that purpose."
"The design is highly beneficial. It functions as a sandbox environment."
"The product is very good, as I have seen no downtime in the two years of use."
"The solution is very easy for new users because it includes very good documentation and transparency."
More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pros
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"I am really impressed by TIBCO's integration of any level of complexity."
"I like that it is a very good integration tool with many other things. TIBCO is very good for cloud integration"
 

Cons

"The OpenAI components in Logic Apps could be more understandable."
"There could be custom code for the product's components."
"The main issue is performance, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. Performance-wise, that's the only thing Microsoft should focus on."
"The documentation could be better. I think that's the only thing that was causing a normal level of problems. In terms of the documentation, it came from Cosmos DB and an additional product from Microsoft Azure."
"Additionally, enhancing scalability features, such as implementing queuing mechanisms for high-concurrency scenarios, would greatly improve its utility."
"The business rules engine is still not fully developed, and it would be very helpful to see improvements here."
"The product needs improvement in getting direct access to the code and versioning."
"It would be beneficial to have less code and tighter integration between different cloud services."
More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps cons
"The deployment was rather complicated."
"TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex."
"Integrations could be better. Although integration is good, we have faced some block issues."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's cost can vary depending on your specific use case. Generally, it's considered cheaper, but the price depends on how much you use it and which features you need. Initially, there was a consumption-based pricing model, but now Microsoft offers a standard tier. Microsoft encourages users to migrate from the consumption model to the standard one by 2025. The pricing is a monthly fixed cost, depending on your usage needs."
"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten"
"Compared to the prices of Mulesoft, the price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is low."
"If we are comparing to other public cloud vendors, such as Amazon or Google Cloud platform, I wouldn't say that it's expensive. However, when we're comparing between a host such as GoDaddy or Digital Ocean, then it's a bit on the expensive side."
"In my experience, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is not a cheap solution."
"The pricing is okay. It's not highly priced. It's in the medium range."
"Its price depends on the number of transactions, storage capacity, etc., defining if the subscription will be monthly or weekly."
"The product pricing aligns well with the value and capabilities offered by Azure services."
More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pricing and cost advice
"We don't pay for a license."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Educational Organization
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Real Estate/Law Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Consumer Goods Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
Microsoft provides a reliable solution, but it is considered expensive compared to others. Pricing is dynamic, based on scalability and usage. It is comparable to IBM MQ in cost.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs further development in consistency and durability, particularly for handling larger data volumes beyond 1 MB. Additionally, I have concerns about disaster recovery ...
See all answers
What do you like most about TIBCO Cloud Integration?
The product's initial setup phase was easy.
See all answers
What needs improvement with TIBCO Cloud Integration?
The API part of the solution is an area in the solution where improvements are made since I see that TIBCO is currently trying to revamp its tool by focusing more on redesigning it. There was a too...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for TIBCO Cloud Integration?
I mainly use TIBCO Cloud Integration for iPaaS platforms, SaaS connectors, and SaaS connectivity that you have. The solution can be deployed on the cloud and on an on-premises model, so you can go ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Boomi iPaaS vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Boomi iPaaS vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Compared 30% of the time
Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Compared 17% of the time
Workato vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Workato vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Compared 12% of the time
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Compared 11% of the time
Talend Data Integration vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Talend Data Integration vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Compared 2% of the time
More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Competitors
TIBCO BusinessWorks vs TIBCO Cloud Integration Logo
TIBCO BusinessWorks vs TIBCO Cloud Integration
Compared 22% of the time
Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs TIBCO Cloud Integration Logo
Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs TIBCO Cloud Integration
Compared 20% of the time
Boomi iPaaS vs TIBCO Cloud Integration Logo
Boomi iPaaS vs TIBCO Cloud Integration
Compared 16% of the time
Informatica PowerCenter vs TIBCO Cloud Integration Logo
Informatica PowerCenter vs TIBCO Cloud Integration
Compared 14% of the time
More TIBCO Cloud Integration Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
June 2025
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps reportDownload Microsoft Azure Logic Apps product report
Buyer's Guide
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
June 2025
TIBCO Cloud Integration reportDownload TIBCO Cloud Integration product report
 

Also Known As

Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps
No data available
 

Overview

Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

Microsoft

TIBCO Cloud Integration, built on open-source technologies, can connect cloud, on-premises, and IoT edge applications. It has a drag-and-drop and API-led design approach and a deploy-anywhere model.

TIBCO
 

Sample Customers

nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems
NASA, T-Mobile, EagleView, Air France KLM, Caesars Entertainment
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration
June 2025
Free Report: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.