Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps comparison

Informatica and Microsoft are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Informatica is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.4, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. Informatica holds a 0.6% mindshare in PaaS, compared to Microsoft’s 15.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Informatica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Informatica Intelligent Clo...

Read 7 Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services reviews

432 Views
78 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Read 39 Microsoft Azure Logic Apps reviews

3,944 Views
2,212 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Informatica Intelligent Clo...

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services compete in the automation and integration platform category. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps has the upper hand with its user-friendly interface and seamless integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, whereas Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is strong in advanced data management and processing capabilities.

Features: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers robust connectivity to various Microsoft services and APIs, seamless integration with Microsoft products, and a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface. Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services provides advanced data transformation features, comprehensive data management capabilities, and extensive support for different data formats.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could benefit from enhanced debugging tools, improved documentation, and more advanced data manipulation options. Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services could improve its learning curve, streamline support for complex integrations, and simplify the initial setup process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is known for straightforward deployment, fast setup time, and reasonable support services. Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, though initially complex to set up, offers powerful deployment capabilities for large-scale data operations and robust long-term customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is highlighted for its cost-effectiveness, especially for businesses already using Microsoft services. Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, although more expensive, is considered a valuable investment for advanced data capabilities, resulting in greater long-term ROI despite higher initial setup costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,772 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Informatica Intelligent Clo...

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is 15.7%, up from 13.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Argha Das

Senior Associate at Cognizant

Good tool, especially if you're using cloud services and an S3 bucket

There's definitely room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness. One example is that you can't search for jobs directly by file name. You can only search by job name. So, if you want to find a job that works with a specific file, you have to go through each job individually to find the right one. So, I'd like to see a faster search, one where I can search directly by file name. Moreover, the support team could improve by adding things like file transfer status updates. Also, if someone modifies a job and then leaves the company, that shouldn't disrupt the job for active users. It would be better if the job continued to run smoothly regardless of who modified it.

Read full review

Ritu-Raj

Chief Engineer - Cloud | Azure | Integration at Numerics Cloud

Influenced cost savings by approximately seventy to eighty percent

I have worked on multiple platforms in this space, like MuleSoft, Oracle, Intel, Microsoft, and Dell Boomi. However, Azure Logic Apps is the easiest and most transparent in terms of its operations, licensing cost, and scaling. Being in Azure, the use of the Azure ecosystem becomes quite native with Logic Apps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution allows you to easily access and make use of information that you have in your on-premises environment."

"I rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten."

"The data integration and synchronization features in IICS improve the data handling processes."

"Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services offers a wide variety of services, including Cloud Data Integration, which is akin to a replica of PowerCenter on the cloud. I particularly like the mass ingestion service."

"Customer service and technical support are excellent."

"The most valuable feature of Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services for me is the availability of connectors."

"The feature I found most valuable in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is the mapping. You just drag, and it maps the data. Mapping is very easy, and it's no code. When you migrate data or when the data interaction happens at the source and destination, the challenge is that you'll get different formats. The validation has to be done in the middleware, and the transformation should happen. In Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, it's very easy to do data validation and transformation compared to any other tool."

"What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that you can run a workflow or do a high-level process orchestration, then you can call the other function and fulfill the process. For example, if you want to update a customer, you first need to get the customer's phone number and simulate the steps of the process, then Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can orchestrate that process."

"It's easy to use, and it's stable."

"I am impressed with the tool's UI and analytics."

"Connectors are very useful for streamlining data integration tasks."

"It's quite similar to Power Optima, but I use it mainly to integrate with databases, and it works well for that purpose."

"We can write external features and transfer the data using JPIMs securely which has been most valuable."

"The product has efficient connectors."

"Its integration capabilities are great, allowing connectivity with various applications and services."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pros

Cons

"The cloud version of Informatica, although easier and more advanced than PowerCenter, still requires a deep dive to fix bugs."

"The tool is quite good overall, but sometimes the number of modules can be overwhelming. If the development interface could be optimized to have fewer modules, it would be greatly beneficial."

"Synchronicity is an area for improvement in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services. For example, when you want real-time or immediate response from the solution when multiple technologies are involved, the integration with Informatica Intelligent Cloud isn't seamless, whether it's the MQ, JMS, or BES service, so the connectivity should be improved a bit. The data governance is good, but what's lacking is a demo. For example, if there's a new feature in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, the documentation for that new feature is limited, so if Informatica could give a more complete documentation and more demos, that would be better for the users. Right now, there isn't any issue with any of the features of the solution. It's the new feature awareness or user training, and improved connectivity that I'd like to see in the next version of Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services."

"In terms of data volume processing, Intelligent Cloud Services does not match the efficiency of Power Center."

"This service could be more cost-effective."

"There's definitely room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness. One example is that you can't search for jobs directly by file name. You can only search by job name. So, if you want to find a job that works with a specific file, you have to go through each job individually to find the right one. So, I'd like to see a faster search, one where I can search directly by file name."

"The product's pricing is definitely an area where a bit of improvement is needed."

"A room for improvement in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that it's expensive. Every step is going to cost you money, so if someone is not doing the steps carefully, at the end of the day, it will cost a lot of money. Each time you execute a step, the cost will depend on how much you use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, and how many workflow steps you have. Each time a step needs to be executed, there'll be a cost added to your bill. If the developer isn't careful with how he uses the solution, this can blow up the cost. What I'd like to see in the next release of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is for the cost and security to be better."

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can improve by continually updating the connectors to make them better."

"The solution lacks sufficient connectors."

"It's for a limited kind of application or short Apps. And, not for the complex applications."

"It would be helpful if the vendor could provide more data connectors."

"It would be beneficial to have less code and tighter integration between different cloud services."

"The product needs improvement in getting direct access to the code and versioning."

"The standard logic app could be simplified. Thats what we would like to see in the next release."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model is something that can be improved."

"The solution is expensive."

"In terms of the licensing for Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, we had the option of paying based on the number of users and paying based on the volume of data, and we went with the data volume licensing option. Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services isn't as expensive as CIG. The pricing for it is okay, so I'm rating it a four out of five in terms of pricing. We did use the email verification and address validation services which weren't part of the contract, so we had to pay additional fees for those services."

"The licensing is cheaper because, compared to other services, Azure services are much cheaper and affordable."

"In my experience, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is not a cheap solution."

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is a little bit expensive, and that is why you use it only for certain types of scenarios."

"The pricing is not expensive."

"Logic Apps is cheap with its pay-as-you-go model. We only pay for usage time, no license fees. So Logic Apps is good in that aspect."

"The product is quite cheap."

"The cost of the solution could be cheaper."

"The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

59%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Consumer Goods Company

Educational Organization

33%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services?

The data integration and synchronization features in IICS improve the data handling processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services?

Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is affordable for my specific use cases, with the pricing being rated three or four on a scale where one is very cheap. The affordability may vary based on ho...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services?

The tool is quite good overall, but sometimes the number of modules can be overwhelming. If the development interface could be optimized to have fewer modules, it would be greatly beneficial.

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

Microsoft provides a reliable solution, but it is considered expensive compared to others. Pricing is dynamic, based on scalability and usage. It is comparable to IBM MQ in cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs further development in consistency and durability, particularly for handling larger data volumes beyond 1 MB. Additionally, I have concerns about disaster recovery ...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Boomi iPaaS vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 30% of the time

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 16% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 16% of the time

Workato vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 11% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services

April 2025

Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services report

Download Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

March 2025

Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps product report

Also Known As

Informatica IICS, IICS

Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps

Overview

Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is a next generation iPaaS, which is made up of a growing number of data management products. The productivity of the environment is accelerated by a common user experience across all products, the AI/ML-driven intelligence of the CLAIRE™ engine, and a microservices architecture.

Informatica

Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

2-1-1 San Diego, Hastings, AARP , Ace Hardware

nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems

Buyer's Guide

Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

March 2025

Free Report: Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.