Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Composer comparison

Microsoft and Salesforce are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while Salesforce is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 12.4% mindshare in PaaS, compared to Salesforce’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Read 41 Microsoft Azure Logic Apps reviews
  • 2,770 Views
  • 2,770 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
MuleSoft Composer
Read 7 MuleSoft Composer reviews
  • 1,201 Views
  • 721 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and MuleSoft Composer are leading integration platforms. User reviews indicate that Microsoft Azure Logic Apps excels in cost-effectiveness, while MuleSoft Composer is favored for its rich feature set.

Features: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is praised for its pre-built connectors, robust workflow automation, and seamless integration with other Microsoft services. MuleSoft Composer stands out with its extensive range of integration capabilities, advanced features like API management and data transformation, and comprehensive tools for complex integrations.

Room for Improvement: Users of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps suggest enhancements in documentation, debugging tools, and interface intuitiveness. MuleSoft Composer could improve performance, initial setup processes, and user onboarding. Both platforms have areas to refine, but user feedback is slightly more critical for MuleSoft Composer regarding performance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is noted for its easy deployment, reliable customer support, and integration with Azure support channels. MuleSoft Composer, while offering detailed deployment options, faces criticism for its complexity; nevertheless, its customer service is highly rated for responsiveness and effectiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is often highlighted for its budget-friendly pricing and strong ROI, with pay-as-you-go options and potential cost savings within the Azure ecosystem. MuleSoft Composer, albeit more expensive, is seen as yielding high returns due to its advanced capabilities, with users acknowledging the higher cost but justifying it with superior features and resultant business value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 872,098 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
3.0
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers significant integration benefits, with ROI varying from 10% to 30% depending on specifics.
Sentiment score
5.4
MuleSoft Composer improves data exchange, boosts efficiency by up to 70%, and supports scalable integration across departments, suggesting high value.
You can't generalize it because it depends on how many connectors you use, how many workflows you build, what scalability is required, and the amount of data to be ingested.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps support is mixed, with varying response times, but premium plans and proactive support are appreciated.
Sentiment score
5.2
MuleSoft Composer's customer service is generally satisfactory, though improvements are needed in response time and priority services.
It is easy to reach out to Microsoft for support if needed.
The support is good, with multiple options like developer support and 24x7 support.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
5.6
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offer high scalability and ease for configuring and automating workflows, ideal for small and medium enterprises.
Sentiment score
6.0
MuleSoft Composer is rated positively for scalability, supporting both large user numbers and smaller groups efficiently.
It's just clicks away, and you can also set it up as auto-scaling.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.1
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is highly rated for stability and reliability, with minimal downtime despite occasional architectural issues.
Sentiment score
6.6
Users praise MuleSoft Composer's stability and support, noting minor glitches but effective resource deployment and no crashes.
I have never seen it misperforming.
We have had it implemented for two years without issues.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps struggles with user interface, affordability, documentation clarity, customization, performance, pricing predictability, and integration improvements.
MuleSoft Composer needs platform integration, interface, scalability enhancements, effective guidance, AI, simplified configuration, and improved monitoring features.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs further development in consistency and durability, particularly for handling larger data volumes beyond 1 MB.
My experience with their pricing indicates that pricing is complicated to understand and costly.
The business rules engine is still not fully developed, and it would be very helpful to see improvements here.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report
It would be better to concentrate on one platform and develop everything on it for the integrated development environment.
For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report
SS
Gayatri Dhawade - PeerSpot reviewerRitu-Raj - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2763903 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers cost-effective pay-per-use pricing but can become expensive at larger scales with complex needs.
MuleSoft Composer pricing is seen as high, prompting calls for regional adjustments to enhance accessibility for medium companies.
There are no upfront licensing costs or contracts you are bound to.
Microsoft provides a reliable solution, but it is considered expensive compared to others.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers minimal code, fast deployment, seamless integration, scalability, and reliable automation for diverse systems.
MuleSoft Composer simplifies integration for Salesforce users with prebuilt connectors and compatibility without requiring programming skills.
At API Gateway, we have policies that help us implement encryption and decryption.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps has many features that are beneficial for workflow automation, such as running automation tasks and facilitating communication between different interfaces.
The workflow in Logic Apps enables integrating multiple applications.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report
It has more options for installation and architecture because it can run entirely on-premise.
For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report
Gayatri Dhawade - PeerSpot reviewer
SS
Ritu-Raj - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2763903 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
MuleSoft Composer
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
11th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (25th), Cloud Data Integration (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is 12.4%, down from 14.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 2.1%, down from 5.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps12.4%
MuleSoft Composer2.1%
Other85.5%
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Gayatri Dhawade - PeerSpot reviewer
Has supported seamless integration flows while requiring improvement in cost transparency
Assessing the ease of connecting disparate systems using Microsoft Azure Logic Apps connectors is simple because we have a Standard Operating Process. If we want to use Logic Apps, we just reserve the instances as per our requirement. Even for Blob storage, we use tokenized endpoints that give us access to this storage account, making it secure. At API Gateway, we have policies that help us implement encryption and decryption. Request parameters are mapped automatically, converted to SOAP, XML, or JSON as needed in different formats. We utilize its monitoring capabilities; Event Grids are used for logging events. Additionally, we have implemented a retry mechanism and are using Azure Monitor for end-to-end request tracing.
Read full review
Prince Barai - PeerSpot reviewer
The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved
Our customer’s system is very old. We are trying to upgrade it. We are extracting data from the system and sending it to Salesforce. The product is a good option if we want to build process automation for data. It can be done quickly through the tool. We need not do coding and waste our time and efforts. The ease of learning depends on the person who is learning the product. It depends on whether they come from a developer background. It would be easy to learn if they have some experience in coding and have worked on integrations. I haven’t faced many challenges while scaling our integration solutions with MuleSoft Composer. The drag-and-drop interface has not impacted our project deployment time much. The customer support and price can be improved. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
872,098 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise24
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
Regarding the cost, I find Microsoft Azure Logic Apps to be reasonable; it is not expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
State management is the main challenge I have faced with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps during this period of time. The issues I am facing with state management in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps arise beca...
See all answers
What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?
The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?
It's costly, especially for Indian clients. Reducing the price would help them penetrate the Indian market. A two-year license costs around seventy lakhs rupees. It's a considerable amount.
See all answers
What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?
Configuration could be easier, but we were able to handle it. It seems that juniors find it challenging, but seniors like me know how to configure it properly. There are no issues. There is also on...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Boomi iPaaS vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Boomi iPaaS vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Compared 27% of the time
Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Compared 14% of the time
Workato vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
Workato vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Compared 13% of the time
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Compared 10% of the time
webMethods.io vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Logo
webMethods.io vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Compared 8% of the time
More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Competitors
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer Logo
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer
Compared 34% of the time
Workato vs MuleSoft Composer Logo
Workato vs MuleSoft Composer
Compared 19% of the time
Zapier vs MuleSoft Composer Logo
Zapier vs MuleSoft Composer
Compared 13% of the time
PortX vs MuleSoft Composer Logo
PortX vs MuleSoft Composer
Compared 13% of the time
Boomi iPaaS vs MuleSoft Composer Logo
Boomi iPaaS vs MuleSoft Composer
Compared 11% of the time
More MuleSoft Composer Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
October 2025
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps reportDownload Microsoft Azure Logic Apps product report
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Data Integration
October 2025
MuleSoft Composer reportDownload MuleSoft Composer product report
 

Also Known As

Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps
MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce
 

Overview

Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

Microsoft

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

    Salesforce
     

    Sample Customers

    nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems
    Information Not Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer
    September 2025
    Free Report: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    872,098 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer report.
    See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

    We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.