Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Composer comparison

Microsoft and Salesforce are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Salesforce is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 15.7% mindshare in PaaS, compared to Salesforce’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Read 39 Microsoft Azure Logic Apps reviews

3,944 Views
2,212 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Read 6 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,010 Views
781 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

MuleSoft Composer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and MuleSoft Composer are leading integration platforms. User reviews indicate that Microsoft Azure Logic Apps excels in cost-effectiveness, while MuleSoft Composer is favored for its rich feature set.

Features: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is praised for its pre-built connectors, robust workflow automation, and seamless integration with other Microsoft services. MuleSoft Composer stands out with its extensive range of integration capabilities, advanced features like API management and data transformation, and comprehensive tools for complex integrations.

Room for Improvement: Users of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps suggest enhancements in documentation, debugging tools, and interface intuitiveness. MuleSoft Composer could improve performance, initial setup processes, and user onboarding. Both platforms have areas to refine, but user feedback is slightly more critical for MuleSoft Composer regarding performance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is noted for its easy deployment, reliable customer support, and integration with Azure support channels. MuleSoft Composer, while offering detailed deployment options, faces criticism for its complexity; nevertheless, its customer service is highly rated for responsiveness and effectiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is often highlighted for its budget-friendly pricing and strong ROI, with pay-as-you-go options and potential cost savings within the Azure ecosystem. MuleSoft Composer, albeit more expensive, is seen as yielding high returns due to its advanced capabilities, with users acknowledging the higher cost but justifying it with superior features and resultant business value.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,772 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (27th), Cloud Data Integration (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is 15.7%, up from 13.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 3.3%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Ritu-Raj

Chief Engineer - Cloud | Azure | Integration at Numerics Cloud

Influenced cost savings by approximately seventy to eighty percent

I have worked on multiple platforms in this space, like MuleSoft, Oracle, Intel, Microsoft, and Dell Boomi. However, Azure Logic Apps is the easiest and most transparent in terms of its operations, licensing cost, and scaling. Being in Azure, the use of the Azure ecosystem becomes quite native with Logic Apps.

Read full review

Prince Barai

Back End Developer at Agnos Inc.

The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved

Our customer’s system is very old. We are trying to upgrade it. We are extracting data from the system and sending it to Salesforce. The product is a good option if we want to build process automation for data. It can be done quickly through the tool. We need not do coding and waste our time and efforts. The ease of learning depends on the person who is learning the product. It depends on whether they come from a developer background. It would be easy to learn if they have some experience in coding and have worked on integrations. I haven’t faced many challenges while scaling our integration solutions with MuleSoft Composer. The drag-and-drop interface has not impacted our project deployment time much. The customer support and price can be improved. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a very stable solution."

"One special aspect of Azure Logic Apps is its easy integration of various applications, especially when connectors are already available. For instance, there are connectors for database applications and systems like SAP. You can drag and drop the connectors to complete your integration quickly."

"The workflow in Logic Apps enables integrating multiple applications."

"The design is highly beneficial. It functions as a sandbox environment."

"The product's initial setup phase is something that I don't think is complex because once we start using it, it becomes simple."

"If we are working with a service-oriented architecture, as an architect as a baseline, it supports us very well in terms of expandability, and the kind of robustness it brings, especially with its serverless nature is fabulous."

"The solution is very easy for new users because it includes very good documentation and transparency."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is the many available connectors that make automation easy. Additionally, the security of the solution is good."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pros

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

Cons

"The standard logic app could be simplified. Thats what we would like to see in the next release."

"It can be a bit challenging to use."

"The documentation could be better. I think that's the only thing that was causing a normal level of problems. In terms of the documentation, it came from Cosmos DB and an additional product from Microsoft Azure."

"Not all connectors are readily available, though. There are two types: managed connectors and app connectors. Some connectors require you to provide a username and password to connect to platforms like SharePoint or Salesforce. Due to security constraints, some users may prefer not to use these connectors. Instead, they might opt for the HTTP connector."

"I find the current interface useful, but I could see how others would want the UI bits that are used for creating Logic Apps to be simplified."

"The business rules engine is still not fully developed, and it would be very helpful to see improvements here."

"The main issue is performance, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. Performance-wise, that's the only thing Microsoft should focus on."

"The solution lacks sufficient connectors."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps cons

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is quite cheap."

"The product pricing aligns well with the value and capabilities offered by Azure services."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten"

"The tool’s pricing could be better."

"The pricing is okay. It's not highly priced. It's in the medium range."

"The tool's cost can vary depending on your specific use case. Generally, it's considered cheaper, but the price depends on how much you use it and which features you need. Initially, there was a consumption-based pricing model, but now Microsoft offers a standard tier. Microsoft encourages users to migrate from the consumption model to the standard one by 2025. The pricing is a monthly fixed cost, depending on your usage needs."

"It's a bit costly at the end of the day. It's difficult to calculate pricing, and that affects the business. That's one challenge."

"The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pricing and cost advice

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

33%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

Microsoft provides a reliable solution, but it is considered expensive compared to others. Pricing is dynamic, based on scalability and usage. It is comparable to IBM MQ in cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs further development in consistency and durability, particularly for handling larger data volumes beyond 1 MB. Additionally, I have concerns about disaster recovery ...

See all answers

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

It's costly, especially for Indian clients. Reducing the price would help them penetrate the Indian market. A two-year license costs around seventy lakhs rupees. It's a considerable amount.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

Configuration could be easier, but we were able to handle it. It seems that juniors find it challenging, but seniors like me know how to configure it properly. There are no issues. There is also on...

See all answers

Comparisons

Boomi iPaaS vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 30% of the time

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 16% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 16% of the time

Workato vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 11% of the time

Jitterbit Harmony vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 40% of the time

Zapier vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 14% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 14% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 10% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 9% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

March 2025

Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

March 2025

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Also Known As

Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Overview

Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

Microsoft

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

Sample Customers

nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer

March 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.