Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Composer comparison

Microsoft and Salesforce are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while Salesforce is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.8. Microsoft holds a 7.2% mindshare in PaaS, compared to Salesforce’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Read 41 Microsoft Azure Logic Apps reviews

2,861 Views
2,861 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Read 7 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,461 Views
731 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

MuleSoft Composer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and MuleSoft Composer are leading integration platforms. User reviews indicate that Microsoft Azure Logic Apps excels in cost-effectiveness, while MuleSoft Composer is favored for its rich feature set.

Features: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is praised for its pre-built connectors, robust workflow automation, and seamless integration with other Microsoft services. MuleSoft Composer stands out with its extensive range of integration capabilities, advanced features like API management and data transformation, and comprehensive tools for complex integrations.

Room for Improvement: Users of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps suggest enhancements in documentation, debugging tools, and interface intuitiveness. MuleSoft Composer could improve performance, initial setup processes, and user onboarding. Both platforms have areas to refine, but user feedback is slightly more critical for MuleSoft Composer regarding performance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is noted for its easy deployment, reliable customer support, and integration with Azure support channels. MuleSoft Composer, while offering detailed deployment options, faces criticism for its complexity; nevertheless, its customer service is highly rated for responsiveness and effectiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is often highlighted for its budget-friendly pricing and strong ROI, with pay-as-you-go options and potential cost savings within the Azure ecosystem. MuleSoft Composer, albeit more expensive, is seen as yielding high returns due to its advanced capabilities, with users acknowledging the higher cost but justifying it with superior features and resultant business value.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

3.0

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers significant integration benefits, with ROI varying from 10% to 30% depending on specifics.

Sentiment score

5.4

MuleSoft Composer improves data exchange, boosts efficiency by up to 70%, and supports scalable integration across departments, suggesting high value.

You can't generalize it because it depends on how many connectors you use, how many workflows you build, what scalability is required, and the amount of data to be ingested.

Pardhasaradhy Kolachina

Principal Architect at Fracral

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.2

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps support is mixed, with varying response times, but premium plans and proactive support are appreciated.

Sentiment score

5.2

MuleSoft Composer's customer service is generally satisfactory, though improvements are needed in response time and priority services.

It is easy to reach out to Microsoft for support if needed.

Ritu-Raj

Chief Engineer - Cloud | Azure | Integration at Numerics Cloud

The support is good, with multiple options like developer support and 24x7 support.

Sanjay Sahu

Project Manager at Capgemini

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

5.6

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offer high scalability and ease for configuring and automating workflows, ideal for small and medium enterprises.

Sentiment score

6.0

MuleSoft Composer is rated positively for scalability, supporting both large user numbers and smaller groups efficiently.

It's just clicks away, and you can also set it up as auto-scaling.

Ritu-Raj

Chief Engineer - Cloud | Azure | Integration at Numerics Cloud

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.1

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is highly rated for stability and reliability, with minimal downtime despite occasional architectural issues.

Sentiment score

6.6

Users praise MuleSoft Composer's stability and support, noting minor glitches but effective resource deployment and no crashes.

I have never seen it misperforming.

Ritu-Raj

Chief Engineer - Cloud | Azure | Integration at Numerics Cloud

We have had it implemented for two years without issues.

Sanjay Sahu

Project Manager at Capgemini

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps struggles with user interface, affordability, documentation clarity, customization, performance, pricing predictability, and integration improvements.

MuleSoft Composer needs platform integration, interface, scalability enhancements, effective guidance, AI, simplified configuration, and improved monitoring features.

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs further development in consistency and durability, particularly for handling larger data volumes beyond 1 MB.

Sanjay Sahu

Project Manager at Capgemini

My experience with their pricing indicates that pricing is complicated to understand and costly.

Gayatri Dhawade

Technical Architect at Abcl

The business rules engine is still not fully developed, and it would be very helpful to see improvements here.

Ritu-Raj

Chief Engineer - Cloud | Azure | Integration at Numerics Cloud

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report

It would be better to concentrate on one platform and develop everything on it for the integrated development environment.

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Setup Cost

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers cost-effective pay-per-use pricing but can become expensive at larger scales with complex needs.

MuleSoft Composer pricing is seen as high, prompting calls for regional adjustments to enhance accessibility for medium companies.

There are no upfront licensing costs or contracts you are bound to.

Ritu-Raj

Chief Engineer - Cloud | Azure | Integration at Numerics Cloud

Microsoft provides a reliable solution, but it is considered expensive compared to others.

Sanjay Sahu

Project Manager at Capgemini

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Valuable Features

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps offers minimal code, fast deployment, seamless integration, scalability, and reliable automation for diverse systems.

MuleSoft Composer simplifies integration for Salesforce users with prebuilt connectors and compatibility without requiring programming skills.

At API Gateway, we have policies that help us implement encryption and decryption.

Gayatri Dhawade

Technical Architect at Abcl

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps has many features that are beneficial for workflow automation, such as running automation tasks and facilitating communication between different interfaces.

Sanjay Sahu

Project Manager at Capgemini

The workflow in Logic Apps enables integrating multiple applications.

Ritu-Raj

Chief Engineer - Cloud | Azure | Integration at Numerics Cloud

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report

It has more options for installation and architecture because it can run entirely on-premise.

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (25th), Cloud Data Integration (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is 7.2%, down from 13.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 2.5%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps	7.2%
MuleSoft Composer	2.5%
Other	90.3%

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Gayatri Dhawade

Technical Architect at Abcl

Has supported seamless integration flows while requiring improvement in cost transparency

Assessing the ease of connecting disparate systems using Microsoft Azure Logic Apps connectors is simple because we have a Standard Operating Process. If we want to use Logic Apps, we just reserve the instances as per our requirement. Even for Blob storage, we use tokenized endpoints that give us access to this storage account, making it secure. At API Gateway, we have policies that help us implement encryption and decryption. Request parameters are mapped automatically, converted to SOAP, XML, or JSON as needed in different formats. We utilize its monitoring capabilities; Event Grids are used for logging events. Additionally, we have implemented a retry mechanism and are using Azure Monitor for end-to-end request tracing.

Read full review

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has supported on-premise deployments well but could improve tool consolidation and flow development flexibility

I have analyzed but haven't used MuleSoft Composer extensively. I am not very proficient in the subject of pricing. Both platforms are performing well. If a customer is more SAP-centric, it makes sense to consider integration suite because of the predefined content. A customer will need to have SAP BTP for side-by-side application extensions. MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise. It is quite a popular platform. MuleSoft Composer might be less expensive than SAP integration suite, though this is an assumption as I haven't compared prices. I am accustomed to learning and studying with SAP documentation. The organization is more convenient for me, though there are plenty of documentation and resources for MuleSoft Composer as well. The context is the primary consideration. If a customer uses multiple SAP solutions, not just SAP for accounting, it makes sense to consider the integration suite due to better SAP compatibility. When SAP introduces new interface technology, integration suite will be the first to support it, while MuleSoft Composer will need time to develop new connectors. I rate this solution a six out of ten.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	24

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

Regarding the cost, I find Microsoft Azure Logic Apps to be reasonable; it is not expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

My experience with their pricing indicates that pricing is complicated to understand and costly. There should be some cost reduction. Currently, I don't have any use case beyond what the readily av...

See all answers

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible. It seems strange that some functionality from MuleSoft Composer is available from Eclipse and some from Visual Code. It would be bett...

See all answers

Comparisons

Boomi iPaaS vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 21% of the time

Workato vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 11% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 10% of the time

webMethods.io vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 8% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 16% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 13% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 9% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 9% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 8% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

December 2025

Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

December 2025

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Also Known As

Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Overview

Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

Microsoft

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

Sample Customers

nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer

November 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.