Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Composer comparison

Microsoft and Salesforce are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while Salesforce is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 15.9% mindshare in PaaS, compared to Salesforce’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Read 38 Microsoft Azure Logic Apps reviews

4,676 Views
2,417 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Read 6 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,271 Views
1,019 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

MuleSoft Composer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and MuleSoft Composer are leading integration platforms. User reviews indicate that Microsoft Azure Logic Apps excels in cost-effectiveness, while MuleSoft Composer is favored for its rich feature set.

Features: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is praised for its pre-built connectors, robust workflow automation, and seamless integration with other Microsoft services. MuleSoft Composer stands out with its extensive range of integration capabilities, advanced features like API management and data transformation, and comprehensive tools for complex integrations.

Room for Improvement: Users of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps suggest enhancements in documentation, debugging tools, and interface intuitiveness. MuleSoft Composer could improve performance, initial setup processes, and user onboarding. Both platforms have areas to refine, but user feedback is slightly more critical for MuleSoft Composer regarding performance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is noted for its easy deployment, reliable customer support, and integration with Azure support channels. MuleSoft Composer, while offering detailed deployment options, faces criticism for its complexity; nevertheless, its customer service is highly rated for responsiveness and effectiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is often highlighted for its budget-friendly pricing and strong ROI, with pay-as-you-go options and potential cost savings within the Azure ecosystem. MuleSoft Composer, albeit more expensive, is seen as yielding high returns due to its advanced capabilities, with users acknowledging the higher cost but justifying it with superior features and resultant business value.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (28th), Cloud Data Integration (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is 15.9%, up from 13.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 4.6%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Ritu-Raj

Chief Engineer - Cloud | Azure | Integration at Numerics Cloud

Influenced cost savings by approximately seventy to eighty percent

I have worked on multiple platforms in this space, like MuleSoft, Oracle, Intel, Microsoft, and Dell Boomi. However, Azure Logic Apps is the easiest and most transparent in terms of its operations, licensing cost, and scaling. Being in Azure, the use of the Azure ecosystem becomes quite native with Logic Apps.

Read full review

Prince Barai

Back End Developer at Agnos Inc.

The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved

Our customer’s system is very old. We are trying to upgrade it. We are extracting data from the system and sending it to Salesforce. The product is a good option if we want to build process automation for data. It can be done quickly through the tool. We need not do coding and waste our time and efforts. The ease of learning depends on the person who is learning the product. It depends on whether they come from a developer background. It would be easy to learn if they have some experience in coding and have worked on integrations. I haven’t faced many challenges while scaling our integration solutions with MuleSoft Composer. The drag-and-drop interface has not impacted our project deployment time much. The customer support and price can be improved. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps are the triggering based on certain events. You can trigger a Logic App and put your logic behind it and take certain actions. The actions could be anything based on the business logic. For example, if you say something happens, an order comes in, and the order can sit in one of the Azure services. Whenever an order comes in, the Logic App can go look and trigger an event. You can write your logic inside your Logic App and it works similar to a workflow."

"The solution's best feature is that it is compatible with the cloud and has many connectors and third-party adapters."

"The solution has plenty of good valuable features and a plethora of services."

"Its integration capabilities are great, allowing connectivity with various applications and services."

"Logic Apps is good for helping us run our access on a cloud environment like Azure. It's much easier, more reliable, and better to maintain."

"It's quite similar to Power Optima, but I use it mainly to integrate with databases, and it works well for that purpose."

"We can write external features and transfer the data using JPIMs securely which has been most valuable."

"If there's something that isn't possible, you can write some code and call that code from a Logic App."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pros

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

Cons

"The pricing could be improved."

"It would be helpful if the vendor could provide more data connectors."

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can improve by continually updating the connectors to make them better."

"In Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, we use Liquid templates, and I feel it can be improved as it does not support all the features that our company wants to use during any complex mapping when we might have to go for custom coding."

"The support I have received is mixed because in some cases they are accurate, and in others, it was me doing the groundwork and giving feedback for the agent to finally tell me there is an issue in their larger services."

"The solution lacks sufficient connectors."

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could have more customization options for connectors."

"It's for a limited kind of application or short Apps. And, not for the complex applications."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps cons

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a cost-efficient platform."

"The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive."

"Logic Apps is cheap with its pay-as-you-go model. We only pay for usage time, no license fees. So Logic Apps is good in that aspect."

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is a little bit expensive, and that is why you use it only for certain types of scenarios."

"The licensing is cheaper because, compared to other services, Azure services are much cheaper and affordable."

"It's a bit costly at the end of the day. It's difficult to calculate pricing, and that affects the business. That's one challenge."

"Compared to the prices of Mulesoft, the price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is low."

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could be costly if a user isn't careful. The costs associated with the solution could still be improved."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pricing and cost advice

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

38%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

25%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

The pricing is very clean and transparent. You can start small and pay only for what you use. There are no upfront licensing costs or contracts you are bound to.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

The business rules engine is still not fully developed, and it would be very helpful to see improvements here.

See all answers

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

It's costly, especially for Indian clients. Reducing the price would help them penetrate the Indian market. A two-year license costs around seventy lakhs rupees. It's a considerable amount.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

Configuration could be easier, but we were able to handle it. It seems that juniors find it challenging, but seniors like me know how to configure it properly. There are no issues. There is also on...

See all answers

Comparisons

Boomi iPaaS vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 29% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 19% of the time

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 16% of the time

Workato vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 11% of the time

Jitterbit Harmony vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 56% of the time

Zapier vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 12% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 11% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 7% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 7% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

January 2025

Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

January 2025

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Also Known As

Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Learn More

Microsoft

Salesforce

Overview

Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Sample Customers

nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer

December 2024

Free Report: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. MuleSoft Composer report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.