MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer comparison

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and MuleSoft Composer are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while MuleSoft Composer is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform holds a 9.1% mindshare in CDI, compared to MuleSoft Composer’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of MuleSoft Composer users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 56 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

4,049 Views
2,571 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Read 6 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,051 Views
851 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

MuleSoft Composer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 4, 2024

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and MuleSoft Composer are two competing integration products. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform seems to have the upper hand for complex integration tasks, while MuleSoft Composer is preferred for its ease of use and faster deployment times.

Features: Anypoint Platform offers comprehensive integration options, advanced analytics, and a wide range of tools for complex integration tasks. Composer focuses on user-friendliness, quicker and more straightforward integrations, and simpler interfaces that are accessible to non-technical users.

Room for Improvement: Users of Anypoint Platform highlight the need for a more intuitive experience, a faster learning curve, and simplification in complex features. Composer users express the need for expanded integration capabilities, more advanced features, and improved scalability comparable to Anypoint Platform.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Anypoint Platform has longer deployment times due to its complexity but is backed by strong customer service. Composer has a quick deployment process and straightforward setup, making it accessible for immediate use with robust customer support as well.

Pricing and ROI: Anypoint Platform generally has higher setup costs but delivers significant ROI, especially for businesses needing comprehensive integration. Composer, with lower setup costs and immediate usability, offers quicker returns. Users find Anypoint Platform's higher initial investment justified by its extensive features, while Composer is cost-effective for simpler integration needs.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. MuleSoft Composer Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. MuleSoft Composer

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

4th

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (3rd), Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Workload Automation (9th)

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

14th

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (27th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 9.1%, up from 8.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 3.1%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Corydon Hinton

Principal Systems Engineer at Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc.

Mar 19, 2024

Can seamlessly translate protocols and produce fairly quick results

Using the solution was great. It was part of the project that we didn't worry that much about. What I also liked about it was that even though I'm not that technical, I could go in and look at thoughts and events and confirm that the information we were looking for was making it across. I could check at the interface level and lessen the burden on validation within the application. The instrumentation within the solution is important. The ease of implementation is very important. Our partner development team had little trouble dealing with these diverse systems, with JSON on the one hand and SOAP on the other. The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great. The API-led connectivity is great. The reason that we took on the product was that we wanted to learn about it. We wanted to figure out how to use it. A big payoff for this will be in EHR integrations. These systems are all alike, yet they are all different. They all use EPIC, and each installation is a little bit different. It’s a challenge when we go to different hospitals. MuleSoft has made a name for itself in using the integrations.

Read full review

Prince Barai

Back End Developer at Agnos Inc.

Mar 21, 2024

The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved

Our customer’s system is very old. We are trying to upgrade it. We are extracting data from the system and sending it to Salesforce. The product is a good option if we want to build process automation for data. It can be done quickly through the tool. We need not do coding and waste our time and efforts. The ease of learning depends on the person who is learning the product. It depends on whether they come from a developer background. It would be easy to learn if they have some experience in coding and have worked on integrations. I haven’t faced many challenges while scaling our integration solutions with MuleSoft Composer. The drag-and-drop interface has not impacted our project deployment time much. The customer support and price can be improved. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."

"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."

"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."

"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."

"It has improved our organization a lot because of the increase in productivity, and it has simplified the development of products. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is a highly effective tool where you can build integrations so effectively. If you establish the integration platform, it increases productivity. It helps us to do effective re-authentication, and it speeds the integration."

"It's easy to develop APIs."

"The use of ACK is valuable."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

Cons

"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."

"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."

"The solution is very costly. The solution should provide a package with fewer capabilities at a lower price for specific companies that don’t have a big IT budget. Not every customer requires all the capabilities of the software. It will be a good fit in the market, and they will easily sell it more."

"The customer service is not good enough"

"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."

"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."

"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Mule Anypoint Platform is affordable."

"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced."

"The solution has a high price."

"The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM."

"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Licensing can be complex as is the case with most iPaaS/cloud offerings."

"Making changes in Anypoint MQ is expensive."

"The tool's pricing is cheaper than other RPAs' since it is execution-based. Other RPAs charge based on subscriptions."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

22%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

28%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

It's costly, especially for Indian clients. Reducing the price would help them penetrate the Indian market. A two-year license costs around seventy lakhs rupees. It's a considerable amount.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

Configuration could be easier, but we were able to handle it. It seems that juniors find it challenging, but seniors like me know how to configure it properly. There are no issues. There is also on...

See all answers

Comparisons

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon SQS vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 8% of the time

Zapier vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 8% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 7% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 7% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 7% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

November 2024

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

November 2024

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Learn More

Salesforce

Overview

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. MuleSoft Composer

October 2024

Free Report: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. MuleSoft Composer

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. MuleSoft Composer and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. MuleSoft Composer report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors and best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.