MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer comparison

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and MuleSoft Composer are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while MuleSoft Composer is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform holds a 8.8% mindshare in CDI, compared to MuleSoft Composer’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of MuleSoft Composer users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 55 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

4,636 Views
2,776 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Read 6 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,220 Views
992 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

MuleSoft Composer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 4, 2024

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and MuleSoft Composer are two competing integration products. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform seems to have the upper hand for complex integration tasks, while MuleSoft Composer is preferred for its ease of use and faster deployment times.

Features: Anypoint Platform offers comprehensive integration options, advanced analytics, and a wide range of tools for complex integration tasks. Composer focuses on user-friendliness, quicker and more straightforward integrations, and simpler interfaces that are accessible to non-technical users.

Room for Improvement: Users of Anypoint Platform highlight the need for a more intuitive experience, a faster learning curve, and simplification in complex features. Composer users express the need for expanded integration capabilities, more advanced features, and improved scalability comparable to Anypoint Platform.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Anypoint Platform has longer deployment times due to its complexity but is backed by strong customer service. Composer has a quick deployment process and straightforward setup, making it accessible for immediate use with robust customer support as well.

Pricing and ROI: Anypoint Platform generally has higher setup costs but delivers significant ROI, especially for businesses needing comprehensive integration. Composer, with lower setup costs and immediate usability, offers quicker returns. Users find Anypoint Platform's higher initial investment justified by its extensive features, while Composer is cost-effective for simpler integration needs.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. MuleSoft Composer Report (Updated: August 2024).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. MuleSoft Composer

August 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 801,394 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

4th

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (3rd), Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Workload Automation (9th)

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

14th

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 8.8%, up from 8.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 3.3%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Tolulope A. Adeniji

Retired at a educational organization with 11-50 employees

May 6, 2024

Provides application integration and reduces time and effort during upgrades

One of the most valuable aspects was its impact on reducing time and effort during upgrades. Previously, SAP upgrades required significant coordination with multiple teams. Now, thanks to our streamlined integration approach, the SAP team interacts primarily with the integration team. When changes are needed, we simply create a new version. This allows application teams to migrate gradually from the old version to the new one, without extensive involvement from the SAP team. Moreover, our approach has improved reliability by eliminating duplicated efforts. Previously, different teams would often duplicate data sets due to inefficiencies in data naming conventions. We centralized data integration, ensuring that all applications use the same data set.

Read full review

reviewer1713447

Digital Architecture and Value Creation Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees

May 6, 2024

Handles a wide variety of data sources and efficiently organizes and manages integration processes

I'd recommend to invest in staff training upfront and carefully understand the licensing model and your data usage. I would suggest understanding how the licensing model works and how your data flows. This will give you a clearer notion of how much you are going to pay (potential cots). We invested a lot of time figuring out the implications of CPU usage, message rates, memory usage, as well as our data's origin and destination. This allows us to understand the true financial impact of MuleSoft Composer. Without this understanding, you might face unexpected costs. Overall, I would rate the solution nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."

"It's easy to use and comes as a bundle package with the Anypoint Platform, removing the need for any complex setup."

"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."

"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."

"It can scale."

"The tool’s API management capabilities are excellent."

"The tool is very capable and offers a high performance. The tool supports batch processing and ETL processing."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

Cons

"The solution's licensing model is expensive and could be improved."

"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."

"The solution is very costly. The solution should provide a package with fewer capabilities at a lower price for specific companies that don’t have a big IT budget. Not every customer requires all the capabilities of the software. It will be a good fit in the market, and they will easily sell it more."

"The customer service is not good enough"

"I would like to see some data integration and automation."

"Information on monitoring could be improved."

"The price could be improved."

"Anypoint MQ's capabilities are mainly used for messaging purposes, but it doesn't have typical use cases that extend as far as other Message Queue software."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's price seems to be competent in comparison to other products in the market."

"Making changes in Anypoint MQ is expensive."

"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is affordable."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing as four or five out of ten."

"The tool is heavily bundle-priced. I rate the solution’s pricing five on a scale of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."

"The tool's pricing is cheaper than other RPAs' since it is execution-based. Other RPAs charge based on subscriptions."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

29%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

It's costly, especially for Indian clients. Reducing the price would help them penetrate the Indian market. A two-year license costs around seventy lakhs rupees. It's a considerable amount.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

Configuration could be easier, but we were able to handle it. It seems that juniors find it challenging, but seniors like me know how to configure it properly. There are no issues. There is also on...

See all answers

Comparisons

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon SQS vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 8% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 7% of the time

Zapier vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

August 2024

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

August 2024

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Learn More

Salesforce

Overview

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. MuleSoft Composer

August 2024

Free Report: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. MuleSoft Composer

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. MuleSoft Composer and other solutions. Updated: August 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. MuleSoft Composer report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors and best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.