Top 10 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

58 reviews
92% willing to recommend

1,793 followers

Top MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to MuleSoft Anypoint Platform based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), webMethods.io, and SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform surpasses its competitors by offering a comprehensive integration solution with robust API management, seamless cloud connectivity, and an easy-to-use interface, streamlining digital transformations for businesses worldwide.

Salesforce Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Salesforce, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

3.9 out of 5

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

3.9 out of 5

Informatica IDMC offers seamless MDM integration and flexible architecture, ideal for domains needing robust data management. In comparison, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform excels in API management and connectivity, attracting enterprises needing diverse system integration. Each suits different deployment needs and pricing considerations.

Download Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report

Pricing

Informatica IDMC features a straightforward setup process with lower initial costs, while MuleSoft Anypoint Platform involves higher setup expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Informatica IDMC features a straightforward setup process with lower initial costs, while MuleSoft Anypoint Platform involves higher setup expenses.

webMethods.io

4.0 out of 5

webMethods.io

4.0 out of 5

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers robust API management and flexible deployment, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive integration solutions. In comparison, webMethods.io's user-friendly EAI processes, with intuitive interfaces, cater to users needing straightforward integration without extensive coding. Pricing remains a consideration for both.

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. webMethods.io Report

Pricing

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform has a higher setup cost compared to webMethods.io, influencing the overall investment required for integration solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform has a higher setup cost compared to webMethods.io, influencing the overall investment required for integration solutions.

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

4.2 out of 5

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

4.2 out of 5

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite excels in partner connectivity and proactive alerting, ideal for seamless EDI transactions. In comparison, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers superior API management and reusable microservices, beneficial for organizations pursuing complex API-led initiatives.

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Report

Pricing

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite entails more flexible setup costs, while MuleSoft Anypoint Platform requires a higher initial investment, highlighting significant differences in startup expenses between the two integration platforms.

View comparison

Pricing

SAP Process Orchestration

4.1 out of 5

SAP Process Orchestration

4.1 out of 5

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers robust cloud and on-prem integration with over 200 connectors, providing scalability for diverse applications. In comparison, SAP Process Orchestration excels in SAP-native integration, requiring customization for broader use but offers strong process integration capabilities within SAP systems.

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration Report

Pricing

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform has a more straightforward setup cost, whereas SAP Process Orchestration shows a higher initial investment. This price difference underscores the cost efficiency of MuleSoft in the initial implementation phase compared to SAP's offering.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services

4.1 out of 5

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services

4.1 out of 5

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform shines in API management and connectivity, appealing to those needing extensive integration features. In comparison, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services emphasizes secure data exchange and trading partner management, attracting organizations prioritizing data security and compliance in their integration solutions.

Download IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report

Pricing

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform involves a higher setup cost compared to IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, highlighting a cost difference that potential customers should consider when evaluating these integration solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM B2B Integrator

3.9 out of 5

IBM B2B Integrator

3.9 out of 5

IBM B2B Integrator excels in data transformation and secure file transfers, ideal for industries with stringent requirements. In comparison, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform combines API management and iPaaS, providing versatile cloud deployment with a rich library of pre-built connectors for seamless integration.

Download IBM B2B Integrator vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report

Pricing

IBM B2B Integrator involves significant setup costs with extensive customization needed, whereas MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers more straightforward setup, making it more accessible for users seeking quicker deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

BizTalk Server

3.7 out of 5

BizTalk Server

3.7 out of 5

BizTalk Server integrates seamlessly with Microsoft systems, offering reliable support and robust workflow automation. In comparison, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's advanced cloud-native features and scalability make it ideal for heterogeneous environments, providing flexible connectivity and a subscription-based model for complex system integration.

Download BizTalk Server vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report

Pricing

BizTalk Server involves higher setup costs, while MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

BizTalk Server involves higher setup costs, while MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.

OpenText Trading Grid

4.0 out of 5

OpenText Trading Grid

4.0 out of 5

OpenText Trading Grid is favored for cost-effective setup and strong support in B2B transactions. In comparison, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers advanced API management and flexible integration for complex environments, appealing to buyers seeking robust, long-term integration capabilities and holistic development environments.

Pricing

OpenText Trading Grid involves moderate setup costs, while MuleSoft Anypoint Platform incurs higher initial expenses due to its comprehensive integration capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText Trading Grid involves moderate setup costs, while MuleSoft Anypoint Platform incurs higher initial expenses due to its comprehensive integration capabilities.

Infor ION

4.4 out of 5

Infor ION

4.4 out of 5

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform attracts tech buyers with robust API management and ease of deployment. In comparison, Infor ION appeals through seamless Infor application integration and competitive pricing, offering specialized solutions for businesses within the Infor ecosystem.

Download Infor ION vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report

Pricing

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's setup cost is higher, while Infor ION offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a significant pricing difference in implementation expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's setup cost is higher, while Infor ION offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a significant pricing difference in implementation expenses.

Cleo Integration Cloud Platform

3.5 out of 5

Cleo Integration Cloud Platform

3.5 out of 5

Cleo Integration Cloud attracts buyers with competitive pricing and efficient support. In comparison, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers advanced API management appealing to enterprises requiring comprehensive connectivity. Cleo's simple deployment appeals to smaller operations, while MuleSoft's robust features entice enterprises seeking long-term ROI.

Pricing

Cleo Integration Cloud Platform offers more cost-effective setup pricing, while MuleSoft Anypoint Platform involves a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Cleo Integration Cloud Platform offers more cost-effective setup pricing, while MuleSoft Anypoint Platform involves a higher initial investment.

Show 1 more products

Related categories

Business-to-Business Middleware

Cloud Data Integration

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)