MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

Salesforce and SAP are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. Salesforce is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1, while SAP is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2. Salesforce holds a 12.3% mindshare in BBM, compared to SAP’s 8.9% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of SAP users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 57 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

1,995 Views
1,293 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 32 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

2,471 Views
1,032 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

SAP Process Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and SAP Process Orchestration compete in the integration platform category. MuleSoft has the upper hand due to its versatility, ease of use, and integration flexibility.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform stands out with robust API and integration capabilities, featuring over 200 connectors, high adaptability in cloud and on-premises environments, and user-friendly API management. SAP Process Orchestration excels in integrating with SAP systems, effective monitoring tools, and providing comprehensive SAP environment solutions despite limited non-SAP connections.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft needs to improve technical support responsiveness, simplify processes for non-technical users, and offer more pricing flexibility. SAP Process Orchestration requires enhancements in legacy process management, cloud migration capabilities, and intuitive monitoring tools for non-technical business users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft offers extensive deployment flexibility across public, private, and hybrid clouds, although customer service receives both praise and criticism. SAP Process Orchestration is mainly on-premises, which can be cumbersome for cloud-first strategies, though its support team is dedicated yet occasionally slow in response.

Pricing and ROI: Both platforms are expensive; MuleSoft's pricing, based on usage and vCores, can be high for large transaction volumes, while SAP PO's pricing is justified in bundled agreements. MuleSoft offers considerable ROI through its integration capabilities, although its cost can be prohibitive for SMEs. SAP's ROI is valued within SAP environments, though extra adapter costs may arise.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th), Workload Automation (8th), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

SAP Process Orchestration

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 12.3%, down from 15.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Process Orchestration is 8.9%, down from 13.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

Vijay Subramanyam

Delivery Head at cblsolutions

Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten; it is a highly scalable solution. We have around 200 end users using this solution in our company. We use it to its maximum capacity. However, it's not for P1 applications, but definitely for severity two cases (P2 level). It integrates critical applications, but it's not a platform that, if it stops, the entire system would come down. So, it's more like a severity two level. However, it has the potential to eventually become a P1 platform. Not exactly P1 applications, but a P1 platform. Because now we are still in the transition to migrate everything, all the integrations to Mule Anypoint Platform. But once it's done, then this platform becomes critical. Because even now, we have point-to-point connections.

Read full review

Laxman Molugu

Chief Executive Officer at Saanvi systems inc

Enhances operational efficiency with valuable prepackaged content and cost-effective pricing

For organizations that operate within an SAP ecosystem, SAP Process Orchestration is recommended due to its cost-effectiveness and the availability of valuable prepackaged content. It is important to consider the needs of your industry, as SAP Process Orchestration may not meet all requirements in consumer-oriented sectors. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is the easiest and best tool available."

"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."

"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."

"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."

"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."

"The tool is very capable and offers a high performance. The tool supports batch processing and ETL processing."

"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."

"The flexibility has been great overall."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

"It is simple to transfer files."

"Orchestration is beneficial for us."

"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are its system monitoring and alerts."

"It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs."

"The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity."

"The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems."

"SAP Process Orchestration has all the features that are necessary."

"The solution offers very good documentation and manuals to assist with understanding the solution."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

Cons

"The product does not provide a priority level for the message."

"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."

"There are so many solutions like this, but this is not as mature as those products. The other MQ products have the capability of reprocessing and maintaining the persistence of the data. They can handle large volumes and large messages, but Anypoint MQ doesn't have those capabilities."

"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."

"The stability could be better."

"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."

"Anypoint MQ could improve the user interface."

"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

"It's very difficult to find errors in a simple way."

"The solution could be more scalable."

"The solution needs to move to the cloud."

"Process Orchestration needs to provide secure connectivity as no one has any data information."

"I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible."

"The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users."

"The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved."

"SAP Process Orchestration breaks down sometimes."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."

"I can't give you a straightforward answer because sometimes it depends on the usage. If you're going to have fewer than 5 million messages, it is free of cost. If you're going to have more than 5 million messages, they're going to charge $100 per month"

"Mule Anypoint Platform is affordable."

"The solution has a high price."

"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced."

"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform really needs to work on its pricing model because it's very complicated."

"The product comes complete at one set price including support."

"Licensing can be complex as is the case with most iPaaS/cloud offerings."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

"The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable."

"The fee for maintenance is costly."

"The pricing for this solution is fine."

"My company deals with different pricing models of the product, according to which we don't pay for the solution directly, but we do pay for the maintenance part."

"The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."

"The product is not a low-priced solution, but I can say that it is competitively priced in the market."

"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."

"It is a very expensive solution. We only pay for the license."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

23%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

The main concern is the cost. If additional help is needed due to lack of skill, we have to pay for SAP support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

There are two main areas for improvement: performance and cost. The cost is quite high, and if it were reduced, it might also improve the performance, potentially allowing us to access a more effic...

See all answers

Comparisons

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 15% of the time

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

SAP Data Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 12% of the time

Workato vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 6% of the time

IBM App Connect vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

March 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

March 2025

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

Overview

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

SAP

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration

February 2025

Free Report: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.