MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

Salesforce and SAP are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. Salesforce is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2, while SAP is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5. Salesforce holds a 13.7% mindshare in BBM, compared to SAP’s 11.6% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of SAP users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 55 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

2,739 Views
1,710 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 30 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

3,841 Views
1,598 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

SAP Process Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 4, 2024

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and SAP Process Orchestration compete in the enterprise integration solutions category. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform has the upper hand due to more flexible connectivity options and a broader feature set.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is recognized for its comprehensive API management, diverse connectors, and flexible deployment options. SAP Process Orchestration is known for strong integration with SAP applications, efficient process orchestration capabilities, and built-in workflow management.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform could improve its licensing model, support for complex data transformations, and user interface. SAP Process Orchestration could enhance its user experience, provide a more modern approach to cloud integration, and offer better documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is noted for user-friendly deployment processes and robust support options. SAP Process Orchestration is efficient for SAP environments but more complex to deploy and less intuitive. Users value SAP's specialized customer service for SAP products.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform users have concerns about high setup costs but recognize potential long-term savings and ROI from its flexible capabilities. SAP Process Orchestration users find pricing reasonable within SAP ecosystem contexts, with ROI closely tied to SAP-specific use cases.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration Report (Updated: September 2024).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration

September 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 801,634 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (3rd), Workload Automation (9th), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (1st)

SAP Process Orchestration

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 13.7%, up from 13.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Process Orchestration is 11.6%, down from 16.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

Rohit Sircar

Integration Solutions Lead | Digital Core Transformation Service Line at Hexaware Technologies Limited

Nov 7, 2022

Perfect customer service, consistent stability, and definite return on investment

The most important thing that I have seen is it has removed the data silos because of the three-tier architecture that Mule Anypoint Platform follows The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management. I think in the next release if they could work with the low-code…

Read full review

reviewer2090259

Enterprise Applications Manager at a transportation company with 51-200 employees

Feb 7, 2023

Flexible, simple implementation, and high availability

SAP Process Orchestration is an interface tool. It's a tool to build interfaces between systems The most valuable feature of SAP Process Orchestration is its flexibility in being able to build integrations with SAP systems and non-SAP systems. This is an on-premise platform and one area they can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The use of ACK is valuable."

"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."

"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."

"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."

"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."

"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."

"The most valuable feature of Anypoint MQ is it comes with MuleSoft so we don't have to maintain separate components."

"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

"It is strategically focused to forecast a global integration platform for our business."

"SAP Process Orchestration has all the features that are necessary."

"In my opinion, SAP PO is the most mature suite of tools to integrate processes across SAP environments at this moment. It's really unbeatable because it allows you to integrate whatever scenarios you can imagine."

"The solution is stable."

"The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced."

"The initial setup is easy."

"It is a scalable solution."

"It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

Cons

"This becomes an expensive solution over time."

"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."

"It's extremely expensive to change things in Anypoint MQ. There's also this issue of slow output of messages, and that needs to be improved."

"The stability could be better."

"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."

"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."

"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."

"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

"I think the big improvement required in the tool stems from the fact that the whole issue around it is that we have some downtime failures during upgrades and patching."

"The older version of the solution will no longer be supported."

"The solution is not very scalable because it is at the end of its life."

"SAP Process Orchestration breaks down sometimes."

"It would be beneficial to enhance the ease of implementing new projects and improve overall stability in our implementations."

"I think the main area that SAP PO should improve on is offering pre-delivered content like they do when you use SAP Cloud Platform Integration (CPI). SAP should not forget that they still have a lot of customers using Process Orchestration and they should focus more on providing pre-delivered content in SAP PO."

"It requires some maintenance."

"Process Orchestration needs to provide secure connectivity as no one has any data information."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's price seems to be competent in comparison to other products in the market."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."

"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."

"Making changes in Anypoint MQ is expensive."

"The solution is the priciest in the market which is an issue for some clients."

"Mule Anypoint Platform pricing is slightly higher compared to Dell Boomi."

"The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM."

"The solution has a high price."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

"The pricing depends on what type of client you are with SAP and the contract you have. There is a licensing cost that needs to be paid."

"The fee for maintenance is costly."

"My company deals with different pricing models of the product, according to which we don't pay for the solution directly, but we do pay for the maintenance part."

"The solution is highly-priced."

"We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable."

"The product is not a low-priced solution, but I can say that it is competitively priced in the market."

"Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."

"The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

The product is not a low-priced solution, but I can say that it is competitively priced in the market. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges associated with the prod...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

Some configurations can be a little tricky. The consulting team had to spend a long time checking SAP's community forums and documentation to achieve some goals. The tool could release some new fun...

See all answers

Comparisons

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft Composer vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Denodo vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

SAP Data Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 15% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 9% of the time

IBM App Connect vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 5% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

August 2024

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

August 2024

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

Learn More

Salesforce

SAP

Overview

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration

September 2024

Free Report: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.