MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

Salesforce and SAP are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. Salesforce is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1, while SAP is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Salesforce holds a 11.9% mindshare in BBM, compared to SAP’s 8.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of SAP users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 58 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

1,773 Views
1,199 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 32 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

2,198 Views
941 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

SAP Process Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and SAP Process Orchestration compete in the integration platform category. MuleSoft has the upper hand due to its versatility, ease of use, and integration flexibility.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform stands out with robust API and integration capabilities, featuring over 200 connectors, high adaptability in cloud and on-premises environments, and user-friendly API management. SAP Process Orchestration excels in integrating with SAP systems, effective monitoring tools, and providing comprehensive SAP environment solutions despite limited non-SAP connections.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft needs to improve technical support responsiveness, simplify processes for non-technical users, and offer more pricing flexibility. SAP Process Orchestration requires enhancements in legacy process management, cloud migration capabilities, and intuitive monitoring tools for non-technical business users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft offers extensive deployment flexibility across public, private, and hybrid clouds, although customer service receives both praise and criticism. SAP Process Orchestration is mainly on-premises, which can be cumbersome for cloud-first strategies, though its support team is dedicated yet occasionally slow in response.

Pricing and ROI: Both platforms are expensive; MuleSoft's pricing, based on usage and vCores, can be high for large transaction volumes, while SAP PO's pricing is justified in bundled agreements. MuleSoft offers considerable ROI through its integration capabilities, although its cost can be prohibitive for SMEs. SAP's ROI is valued within SAP environments, though extra adapter costs may arise.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,646 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th), Workload Automation (8th), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

SAP Process Orchestration

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 11.9%, down from 15.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Process Orchestration is 8.6%, down from 13.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

Vijay Subramanyam

Delivery Head at cblsolutions

Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten; it is a highly scalable solution. We have around 200 end users using this solution in our company. We use it to its maximum capacity. However, it's not for P1 applications, but definitely for severity two cases (P2 level). It integrates critical applications, but it's not a platform that, if it stops, the entire system would come down. So, it's more like a severity two level. However, it has the potential to eventually become a P1 platform. Not exactly P1 applications, but a P1 platform. Because now we are still in the transition to migrate everything, all the integrations to Mule Anypoint Platform. But once it's done, then this platform becomes critical. Because even now, we have point-to-point connections.

Read full review

Laxman Molugu

Chief Executive Officer at Saanvi systems inc

Enhances operational efficiency with valuable prepackaged content and cost-effective pricing

For organizations that operate within an SAP ecosystem, SAP Process Orchestration is recommended due to its cost-effectiveness and the availability of valuable prepackaged content. It is important to consider the needs of your industry, as SAP Process Orchestration may not meet all requirements in consumer-oriented sectors. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The use of ACK is valuable."

"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."

"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."

"The community manager is the standout feature of the Mule Anypoint Platform, as it provides a platform to showcase your API to external parties. It is exceptionally user-friendly and enables external parties to easily utilize and consume the APIs."

"The most beneficial features for handling data integration with Mule Anypoint Platform include its ability to integrate seamlessly with other popular platforms like IBM, Dell Boomi, and Microsoft Azure. MuleSoft stands out due to its unique one-point solution for various integration problems, including application and network integration, and its iPaaS services. The Design Center allows for designing APIs that can be made into reusable assets. Additionally, MuleSoft's capability to handle various technologies, such as Python and Java Spring Boot APIs, and monitor them using the Flex Gateway is valuable. Regarding API management, MuleSoft offers a gateway facility, including Flex Gateway, which supports API management with robust governance capabilities. Policies like rate limiting, blocklisting, allowlisting, and client ID enforcement can all be managed through the API Manager, providing comprehensive control over API operations."

"The solution is scalable, and its performance is quite good."

"The product is very user-friendly."

"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

"It is a scalable solution."

"SAP Process Orchestration has all the features that are necessary."

"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are the standard APIs that we can use."

"SAP Process Orchestration is middleware where we are able to manage and interact with everything from a single location. One of the most beneficial areas is monitoring which is very easy because it is all in one place. There are many adapters added recently that can be used for new functionality. The solution is easy to operate and it is more mature than the cloud solution provided by SAP."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems."

"It is strategically focused to forecast a global integration platform for our business."

"The solution is stable."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

Cons

"There are so many solutions like this, but this is not as mature as those products. The other MQ products have the capability of reprocessing and maintaining the persistence of the data. They can handle large volumes and large messages, but Anypoint MQ doesn't have those capabilities."

"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."

"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."

"The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle."

"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."

"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."

"This becomes an expensive solution over time."

"The pricing can be a little bit less."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

"In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them."

"The cloud capability features need improvement."

"The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users."

"I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible."

"It would be beneficial to enhance the ease of implementing new projects and improve overall stability in our implementations."

"The older version of the solution will no longer be supported."

"It is not a scalable solution for the cloud. I would not recommend this for the cloud."

"This is an on-premise platform and one area they can improve on is having the ability to work with SaaS solutions."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is core-based. My customers tell me that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites."

"Regarding pricing, I believe there could be room for improvement to align with user expectations."

"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is affordable."

"The solution has a high price."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing as four or five out of ten."

"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced."

"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

"My company deals with different pricing models of the product, according to which we don't pay for the solution directly, but we do pay for the maintenance part."

"We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable."

"Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."

"The fee for maintenance is costly."

"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."

"The pricing for this solution is fine."

"It's not an expensive solution."

"It is a very expensive solution. We only pay for the license."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

22%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

The main concern is the cost. If additional help is needed due to lack of skill, we have to pay for SAP support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

There are two main areas for improvement: performance and cost. The cost is quite high, and if it were reduced, it might also improve the performance, potentially allowing us to access a more effic...

See all answers

Comparisons

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

SAP Data Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 16% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 12% of the time

Workato vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 6% of the time

IBM App Connect vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

March 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

March 2025

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

Overview

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

SAP

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration

April 2025

Free Report: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.