SAP Process Orchestration vs webMethods.io comparison

SAP and IBM are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. SAP is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while IBM is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Additionally, 91% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 32 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

3,064 Views
1,282 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 91 webMethods.io reviews

1,215 Views
824 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAP Process Orchestration and webMethods.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP Process Orchestration vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration vs. webMethods.io

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 823,795 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

SAP Process Orchestration

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (10th), API Management (9th), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Featured Reviews

Laxman Molugu

Chief Executive Officer at Saanvi systems inc

Enhances operational efficiency with valuable prepackaged content and cost-effective pricing

For organizations that operate within an SAP ecosystem, SAP Process Orchestration is recommended due to its cost-effectiveness and the availability of valuable prepackaged content. It is important to consider the needs of your industry, as SAP Process Orchestration may not meet all requirements in consumer-oriented sectors. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Read full review

Derrick Brockel

Senior Manager of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

An integration platform that enables you to automate tasks by connecting apps and services

Follow best practices,engage in their professional services to help build your messaging system and to be PR have some PR emphasis and and blue Bluegreen deployment You could take half your your clusters out, upgrade them, and put them back in so you have a quick callback. And also patch quarterly, we got we got downbound. And and at that point, it's a little hard to get into the cycle when you're releasing software every every week, and you're trying to, go through an upgrade seven fifty servers, it's a little hard to get into the upgrade flow when when you're running that tight. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"t is a pretty stable solution. I have not seen any outages in the solution."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"The solution offers very good documentation and manuals to assist with understanding the solution."

"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are the standard APIs that we can use."

"The initial setup is easy...The solution gets automatically connected. The deployment takes six months. I rate its setup phase a ten out of ten."

"SAP Process Orchestration provides extensive integrations with external partners, supports B2B operations, and has prepackaged content that saves development time."

"The most valuable feature of SAP Process Orchestration is its flexibility in being able to build integrations with SAP systems and non-SAP systems."

"The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

"webMethods API Portal is overall very valuable. It is now a comprehensive API catalogue that serves various purposes, including API assessment and evaluation."

"The messaging part is the most valuable feature."

"One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations."

"The tool supports gRPC."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution for me has been the configuration-based UI. Once you get the hang of it, it enables you to easily develop an API. In addition, it has many in-built policies that are quite handy."

"I like the tool's scalability."

"The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation."

"The solution's ease-of-use is its most valuable feature, in which complex issues may be resolved."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"Its administration management feature needs to be simpler to use."

"The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users."

"Data modeling is an area of concern in the product where improvements are required."

"There are two main areas for improvement: performance and cost."

"The solution could improve by making it more user-friendly by limiting the code required. We have to add some code in some cases where we need complex logic or some other functions. If this was able to be done in a more simplified manner then it would save a lot of effort and time."

"In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them."

"I think the main area that SAP PO should improve on is offering pre-delivered content like they do when you use SAP Cloud Platform Integration (CPI). SAP should not forget that they still have a lot of customers using Process Orchestration and they should focus more on providing pre-delivered content in SAP PO."

"It's very difficult to find errors in a simple way."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

"It is an expensive solution and not very suitable for smaller businesses."

"The solution's release management feature could be better."

"The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that."

"Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."

"I would like to see the price improve."

"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."

"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."

"Rapid application development has to be considered, especially for UI, where user interference is crucial."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing for this solution is fine."

"We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable."

"It's not an expensive solution."

"There are fees in addition to the licensing."

"The pricing depends on what type of client you are with SAP and the contract you have. There is a licensing cost that needs to be paid."

"The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable."

"My company deals with different pricing models of the product, according to which we don't pay for the solution directly, but we do pay for the maintenance part."

"The solution is highly-priced."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

"Its cost depends on the use cases."

"The pricing is a yearly license."

"The solution’s pricing is too high."

"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."

"I am not involved in the licensing side of things."

"The price is a little bit high, especially regarding their support."

"This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced."

"I don’t have much idea about prices, but webMethods API Portal is not something cheaper."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

SAP Process Orchestration is considered to be cheaper than other middleware solutions up to a certain volume level. It is notably less expensive than alternatives like MuleSoft.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

SAP should improve the user interface, as it often lacks modern features and aesthetic appeal. Additionally, there are other areas in need of enhancement, including monitoring features and end-to-e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Data Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 19% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 16% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 10% of the time

Workato vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 5% of the time

IBM App Connect vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 6% of the time

Mule ESB vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

StreamSets vs webMethods.io

Compared 2% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

November 2024

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

November 2024

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Learn More

SAP

Video not available

IBM

Overview

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

Sample Customers

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration vs. webMethods.io

December 2024

Free Report: SAP Process Orchestration vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Process Orchestration vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP Process Orchestration vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.