Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

webMethods.io pros and cons

Vendor: IBM

4.0 out of 5

92 reviews
94% willing to recommend

3,274 followers

Pros & Cons summary

webMethods.io offers high throughput and scalability for A2A and B2B integrations, ensuring effective business logic management with easy implementation and flexibility. It provides comprehensive connectors for seamless integrations and an API Gateway for lifecycle management. However, challenges include forced migration requiring reimplementation, issues with analytics performance, module stability, and complex upgrades. Additionally, the price may deter long-term customers, and version control proves difficult compared to competitors.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

webMethods.io is recognized for its high throughput and excellent scalability, making it suitable for A2A and B2B usage.

The platform's ease of implementation and flexibility in handling business logic are highlighted as its most valuable features, supporting efficient and robust integrations.

Its comprehensive and versatile set of connectors allows seamless integration with various applications like Oracle, Salesforce, and mainframes, making it a preferred choice for enterprise-level integrations.

B2B partner integration is highly valued within webMethods.io, enabling smooth data exchange through electronic data interchange messages without manual intervention.

The tool's powerful orchestration capabilities, combined with insightful monitoring and debugging tools like Insight, provide significant time-saving advantages during crisis situations.

CONS

Forced migration from MessageBroker to Universal Messaging requires large scale reimplementation for JMS.

The stability of various modules has been a concern, with the support team being accessible but not a preferred solution.

Version upgrades are complicated and often require significant effort for testing and redevelopment due to deprecated services.

There is a high dependency on Software AG for implementation, even with available documentation.

webMethods.io would benefit from improvements in cloud scalability and connectivity with different cloud applications.

webMethods.io Pros review quotes

ZD

IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Dec 21, 2020

Application integrations are offered out-of-the-box, and that is extremely important to us. This is one of the main use cases that we have for it. It is about 60 to 70 percent of the workload in our application today.

Read full review

RF

Enterprise Architect at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

Nov 25, 2020

One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations.

Read full review

SJ

Systems Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Mar 3, 2021

The comprehensiveness and depth of Integration Servers' connectors to packaged apps and custom apps is unlimited. They have a connector for everything. If they don't, you can build it yourself. Or oftentimes, if there is value for other customers as well, you can talk with webMethods about creating a new adapter for you.

Read full review

Free Report: webMethods.io Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about webMethods.io. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Principal Architect and Advisor at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Jan 18, 2023

What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors.

Read full review

RF

Enterprise Architect at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

Dec 15, 2020

Within the new version, webMethods API Gateway gives us an end-to-end lifecycle from the creation of the API up into the development, deployment, and promotion into production/live. The current end-to-end lifecycle of the API gives us enough authority and governance of the API. We know what are currently live services, what is in the testing stage of development, and what version that has been commissioned. So, the full life cycle itself gives us full authority and governance of the API.

Read full review

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Nov 18, 2022

The core product can be used not only for automatic file transfers between applications, but also as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB).

Read full review

RS

Integration Lead at a wellness & fitness company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Dec 9, 2021

The development is very fast. If you know what you're doing, you can develop something very easily and very fast.

Read full review

DV

Dries Vanmarcke

Technical Architect at Colruyt

Apr 12, 2024

This solution has given us a competitive advantage because we have better automation and insight.

Read full review

AS

Enterprise Architect at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Oct 27, 2020

The solution has a very comprehensive and versatile set of connectors. I've been able to utilize it for multiple, different mechanisms. We do a lot of SaaS and we do have IoT devices and the solution is comprehensive in those areas.

Read full review

RJ

Rahul Jayakumar Lekha

Integration Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Oct 21, 2022

From a user perspective, the feature which I like the most about Integration Server is its designer.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 86)

webMethods.io Cons review quotes

ZD

IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Dec 21, 2020

Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time.

Read full review

RF

Enterprise Architect at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

Nov 25, 2020

The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG.

Read full review

SJ

Systems Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Mar 3, 2021

It would be nice if they had a change management system offering. We built our own deployer application because the one built into webMethods couldn't enforce change management rules. Integration into a change management system, along with the version control system, would be a good offering; it's something that they're lacking.

Read full review

Free Report: webMethods.io Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about webMethods.io. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Principal Architect and Advisor at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Jan 18, 2023

The market webMethods Integration Server falls under is a very crowded market, so for the product to stand out, Software AG would need to get traction in the open source community by releasing a new version or a base version and open source it, so people can create new custom components and add it to the portfolio.

Read full review

RF

Enterprise Architect at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.

Dec 15, 2020

With performance, there is room for improvement in regards to if we would like to put another extra layer of security on it, such as SSL. This is affecting their performance quite significantly. They need to improve the process of managing the SSL and other things inside their solutions, so there will not be quite such a significant impact to the performance.

Read full review

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Nov 18, 2022

I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance.

Read full review

RS

Integration Lead at a wellness & fitness company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Dec 9, 2021

The UI for the admin console is very old. It hasn't been updated for years and is pretty much the same one that we started with. This is something that could be refreshed and made more modern.

Read full review

DV

Dries Vanmarcke

Technical Architect at Colruyt

Apr 12, 2024

With respect to the API gateway, the runtime component, the stability after a new release is something that can be improved.

Read full review

AS

Enterprise Architect at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Oct 27, 2020

The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so.

Read full review

RJ

Rahul Jayakumar Lekha

Integration Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Oct 21, 2022

Support is expensive.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 83)

Related questions

49

What are pros and cons of Red Hat Fuse vs webMethods Integration Server?

64

When evaluating Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

36

Why do I need iPaas?

15

What is the best IpaaS solution?

122

Why is Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) important for companies?

58

How can we integrate with Korber OSM using a third-party integration platform like MuleSoft?