MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs webMethods.io comparison

Salesforce and IBM are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Salesforce is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while IBM is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Salesforce holds a 15.4% mindshare in PaaS, compared to IBM’s 9.4% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 55 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

4,847 Views
3,016 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 91 webMethods.io reviews

2,382 Views
1,566 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 4, 2024

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and webMethods.io compete in the integration platforms category. MuleSoft appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and API management capabilities.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers extensive API management, integration capabilities, scalability, and flexibility. webMethods.io is noted for its ease of use, pre-built connectors, and user-friendly interface.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform needs performance optimization and reduced complexity for beginners. webMethods.io users suggest better monitoring tools and more frequent updates.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform has a steep learning curve but offers comprehensive documentation and strong support. webMethods.io is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive support team.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform has a high initial setup cost but offers long-term ROI. webMethods.io is more affordable and provides impressive ROI, especially for smaller setups.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: September 2024).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. webMethods.io

September 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 801,634 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

2nd

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

4th

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (3rd), Workload Automation (9th)

webMethods.io

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

4th

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

6th

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (10th), API Management (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 15.4%, down from 16.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 9.4%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Khedkar Bhagyashree

Technical Lead at DFS Singapore Pte Ltd

Mar 18, 2024

Easy to set it up, good support but we need to use APIs for external integration

When it comes to external systems, we need to use APIs. So, it needs some extra effort. When we are integrating with other applications, readily available connectors make it easy. However, when it comes to external applications, connectivity isn't as straightforward. We need to use RESTful APIs to get and push messages. While it's doable, it's not as simple as using the pre-built connectors. In future releases, Anypoint MQ can increase the message size limit a little bit. We faced issues while working with SAP integrations. SAP can have very large files, and we couldn't handle those within the Anypoint MQ limit.

Read full review

Derrick Brockel

Senior Manager of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Dec 14, 2023

An integration platform that enables you to automate tasks by connecting apps and services

Follow best practices,engage in their professional services to help build your messaging system and to be PR have some PR emphasis and and blue Bluegreen deployment You could take half your your clusters out, upgrade them, and put them back in so you have a quick callback. And also patch quarterly, we got we got downbound. And and at that point, it's a little hard to get into the cycle when you're releasing software every every week, and you're trying to, go through an upgrade seven fifty servers, it's a little hard to get into the upgrade flow when when you're running that tight. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use simple queues and exchanges to route messages to multiple queues. The publish/subscribe model is also helpful."

"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."

"The solution's deployment and proxy processes are very good."

"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."

"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."

"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."

"Messaging and queueing solution that has good stability and scalability. It can be used for a variety of messaging types."

"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution for me has been the configuration-based UI. Once you get the hang of it, it enables you to easily develop an API. In addition, it has many in-built policies that are quite handy."

"Broker and UM are the best features."

"We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting."

"How simple it is to create new solutions."

"The most valuable feature is stability."

"The core product can be used not only for automatic file transfers between applications, but also as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."

"We have found the pricing of the solution to be fair."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."

"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having better integration with MDM. There are challenges when doing the interaction at this time."

"The solution is very costly. The solution should provide a package with fewer capabilities at a lower price for specific companies that don’t have a big IT budget. Not every customer requires all the capabilities of the software. It will be a good fit in the market, and they will easily sell it more."

"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."

"The price could be improved."

"The customer service is not good enough"

"Over the years, Mule Anypoint Platform has undergone significant improvements. When I first started using it, the API gateway capabilities were fairly basic."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

"The market webMethods Integration Server falls under is a very crowded market, so for the product to stand out, Software AG would need to get traction in the open source community by releasing a new version or a base version and open source it, so people can create new custom components and add it to the portfolio."

"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"It is quite expensive."

"Understanding the overall architecture is difficult."

"It is an expensive solution and not very suitable for smaller businesses."

"I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration."

"webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience."

"This is a great solution and the vendor could improve the marketing of the solution to be able to reach more clients."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Mule Anypoint Platform pricing is slightly higher compared to Dell Boomi."

"The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM."

"The solution is the priciest in the market which is an issue for some clients."

"The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is affordable."

"I can't give you a straightforward answer because sometimes it depends on the usage. If you're going to have fewer than 5 million messages, it is free of cost. If you're going to have more than 5 million messages, they're going to charge $100 per month"

"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform really needs to work on its pricing model because it's very complicated."

"The licensing is core-based. My customers tell me that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

"Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client."

"The price of webMethods Integration Server isn't that high from an enterprise context, but open-source ESB solutions will always be the cheapest."

"webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."

"Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers."

"webMethods Integration Server is expensive, and there's no fixed price on it because it has a point pricing model. You can negotiate, which makes it interesting."

"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."

"This is not a cheap solution but, compared to other products such as those offered by IBM, the pricing is similar."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft Composer vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon SQS vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Mule ESB vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

August 2024

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

August 2024

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Learn More

Salesforce

Video not available

IBM

Overview

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. webMethods.io

September 2024

Free Report: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors, best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors, and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.