IBM API Connect vs webMethods.io comparison

IBM API Connect and webMethods.io are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. IBM API Connect is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.1, while webMethods.io is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.9. IBM API Connect holds a 2.1% mindshare in PaaS, compared to webMethods.io’s 9.8% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of IBM API Connect users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of webMethods.io users who would recommend it.

IBM API Connect

Read 75 IBM API Connect reviews

330 Views
284 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 91 webMethods.io reviews

2,266 Views
1,572 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

IBM API Connect

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

IBM API Connect and webMethods.io are two leading API management solutions. IBM API Connect seems to have the upper hand in security support, but webMethods.io is preferred for integration and ease of use.

Features: IBM API Connect is praised for its security, scalability, and comprehensive management tools. webMethods.io is noted for its broad integration options, simplicity, and effective monitoring.

Room for Improvement: IBM API Connect users suggest improvements in complexity, learning curve, and simplifying the interface. webMethods.io users request enhancements in advanced configuration options, more detailed documentation, and better configuration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM API Connect's deployment is considered complex but has highly rated customer support. webMethods.io offers smoother deployment with responsive support, though some users find initial setup challenging.

Pricing and ROI: IBM API Connect's pricing is viewed as competitive with good ROI, though some find initial costs high. webMethods.io is seen as providing great value with lower initial setup costs and favorable ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM API Connect vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

IBM API Connect vs. webMethods.io

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

IBM API Connect

Ranking in API Management

5th

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

10th

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (4th), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (10th), Cloud Data Integration (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of IBM API Connect is 2.1%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 9.8%, up from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Shanmugasundaram Shanmuganathan

Solutions Architect at Synechron

Jan 15, 2024

Offers basic API orchestration and provides robust security and governance features

While Azure API Management offers configurable scalability, IBM API Connect relies on Kubernetes clusters. This might seem manual and require defining cluster instances upfront, but it's completely customizable and not on-the-fly scaling. It's completely custom-driven, not on-the-fly scaling, which some may consider cumbersome. Overall, I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. Almost all applications we've been exposing lately go through this middleware, so it's used extensively. There are around sixty applications directly using it, but six Kubernetes clusters serve those applications. It's heavily used for integration, including system-to-system integration and product integrations. Our usage has been increasing year-on-year based on our needs.

Read full review

Derrick Brockel

Senior Manager of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Dec 14, 2023

An integration platform that enables you to automate tasks by connecting apps and services

Follow best practices,engage in their professional services to help build your messaging system and to be PR have some PR emphasis and and blue Bluegreen deployment You could take half your your clusters out, upgrade them, and put them back in so you have a quick callback. And also patch quarterly, we got we got downbound. And and at that point, it's a little hard to get into the cycle when you're releasing software every every week, and you're trying to, go through an upgrade seven fifty servers, it's a little hard to get into the upgrade flow when when you're running that tight. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The interface is very nice. It makes the solution easy to use and navigate."

"The services that I consume through IBM API Connect are beneficial. It can handle multiple API management."

"WSRR is a powerful component for getting the endpoints."

"Its speed and performance are valuable."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is that it protects our backend system. We are exposing services to external parties and using this solution to protect the backend system, and to have a navigation in between."

"Using API Connect allows us to quickly create proxy APIs and saves time on end-to-end testing, which lets us deliver quickly to clients."

"The gateway is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"Since it runs on top of Datapower, all Datapower based custom policies can be utilized and exported to API connect but its not straightforward/simple process."

More IBM API Connect pros

"How simple it is to create new solutions."

"We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces."

"I like the solution's policies, transformation, mediation, and routing features."

"The messaging part is the most valuable feature."

"Most of the work in our organization can be more easily done using the tool."

"They are the building blocks of EAI in SAG products, and they offer a very good platform."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution for me has been the configuration-based UI. Once you get the hang of it, it enables you to easily develop an API. In addition, it has many in-built policies that are quite handy."

"The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)"

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement regarding the connectivity of the DevOps."

"We have encountered challenges with IBM API Connect, particularly during significant upgrades. These upgrades demand substantial labour and financial resources, including consulting services from IBM. I'd like to see increased flexibility, more frequent updates with new features, an efficient upgrade process, and additional AI capabilities for future releases."

"The only downside where improvements are needed is probably on the licensing side."

"In the next version, I don't know if they've already been included it or not, but the designer and all the tools should be on the cloud. I don't want any external installation or local installation."

"There are some performance issues and issues related to asynchronous APIs."

"While Azure API Management offers configurable scalability, IBM API Connect relies on Kubernetes clusters. This might seem manual and require defining cluster instances upfront, but it's completely customizable and not on-the-fly scaling. It's completely custom-driven, not on-the-fly scaling, which some may consider cumbersome."

"Installation is weak."

"The developer portal could be easier to customize."

More IBM API Connect cons

"They should develop clear visibility for the onboarding."

"This is a great solution and the vendor could improve the marketing of the solution to be able to reach more clients."

"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."

"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics."

"It is quite expensive."

"This product has too many gaps. You find them after update installations. This should be covered by automatic testing."

"For code version control, you need to use some external software."

"Some of the things that we use cannot be done in this solution. For these things, we have to either use a Java service or a util service. There is no predefined or existing service that we can use. So, we have to work on the util service and write on top of it. Its price can also be better. It is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is a licensed product. If your company is looking to obtain a license, you have to work with IBM partners."

"API Connect is expensive - I'd rate their pricing five out of ten."

"There was a need to purchase an upfront license or a one-time license or upfront license, but I cannot remember the details about it clearly."

"It would be a good idea to bring down the pricing by at least 20 to 30 percent."

"I rate the product price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"API Connect is quite pricey."

"I haven't seen anyone go from on-premise to the cloud. In fact, I am seeing people go from the cloud to on-premise because the costs can quickly grow on the cloud."

"The price of the solution is expensive. However, there are a lot of customization capabilities."

More IBM API Connect pricing and cost advice

"Sometimes we don't have a very clear idea what the licensing will entail at first, because it can be very customizable. On one hand, this can be a good thing, because it can be tailored to a specific customer's needs. But on the other hand it can also be an issue when some customer asks, "What's the cost?" and we can't yet give them an accurate answer."

"The product is expensive."

"I don’t have much idea about prices, but webMethods API Portal is not something cheaper."

"Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client."

"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

"The pricing is a yearly license."

"webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them."

"Some who consider this solution often avoid it due to its high price."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

20%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM API Connect?

Publishers can easily identify, create, and publish APIs on the developer portal, defining plans, packages, and potentially billing rules.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM API Connect?

It is a pretty expensive tool. The tool is expensive if I consider how products like WSO2 are available in the market. You have pretty much many options in the open-source community, considering ho...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM API Connect?

The only downside where improvements are needed is probably on the licensing side. Scalability is an issue with IBM API Connect, making it an area where improvements are required.

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM API Connect

Compared 24% of the time

Apigee vs IBM API Connect

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs IBM API Connect

Compared 16% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs IBM API Connect

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs IBM API Connect

Compared 2% of the time

More IBM API Connect Competitors

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 6% of the time

Mule ESB vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM API Connect

October 2024

Download IBM API Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

October 2024

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Learn More

IBM

Video not available

IBM

Overview

IBM API Connect facilitates API management and integration in the financial sector. Companies use it to expose, secure, and manage APIs for banking, insurance, and fintech, deploying it on-premises, in the cloud, or as a hybrid solution.

IBM API Connect focuses on creating and monetizing APIs while enabling seamless transactions and integration with third-party services. It is vital for compliance with regulations and enhances external communication among institutions. With deployment options suitable for different environments, it supports centralized gateway management, robust security features, and comprehensive API lifecycle management. Users benefit from powerful analytics, user-friendly interfaces, and high performance with capabilities in message transformation and efficient monitoring.

What are the most important features?

Centralized Gateway: Manages all APIs through a single entry point.
Robust Security: Ensures API protection with advanced security measures.
Comprehensive API Lifecycle Management: Covers creation, deployment, and retirement of APIs.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies API creation and management tasks.
Powerful Analytics: Provides insights into API usage and performance.
Seamless Integration: Connects easily with third-party services and internal systems.
Flexible Deployment Options: Supports on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.
High Performance: Optimizes API performance and reduces latency.
Message Transformation: Manipulates and formats messages between different systems.
Visualization Tools: Enables clear and detailed views of API usage statistics.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

API Monetization: Generates additional revenue streams from APIs.
Enhanced Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry regulations and standards.
Improved External Communication: Facilitates integration and communication among financial institutions.
Technical Support: Benefit from reliable customer support and easy configuration.
Deployment Flexibility: Choose from on-premises, cloud, or hybrid options.

IBM API Connect is extensively implemented in the financial sector, enabling banking, insurance, and fintech services to manage APIs efficiently. Companies use it to ensure secure transactions, integration with third-party services, and compliance with regulatory standards. Its deployment flexibility accommodates different infrastructure needs, making it suitable for a wide range of financial applications.

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

Sample Customers

Heineken, Tine, Finologee, Axis Bank

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

IBM API Connect vs. webMethods.io

October 2024

Free Report: IBM API Connect vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM API Connect vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM API Connect vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors, best API Management vendors, and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.