

IBM API Connect and Amazon API Gateway compete in API management, with each offering unique features. IBM API Connect has a renowned security gateway and integration abilities, while Amazon API Gateway is recognized for its AWS integration and economical serverless design.
Features: IBM API Connect stands out with a powerful security gateway and integration capabilities between REST and SOAP. It supports multiple security protocols like OAuth and has commercial features for service plans. Additionally, it offers extensive analytics and development tools. Amazon API Gateway integrates seamlessly with AWS services and ensures cost-effectiveness via its serverless architecture, strong security, and efficient traffic management capabilities, including Lambda integration.
Room for Improvement: IBM API Connect needs better integration with Exchange Server and more straightforward policy configurations in DataPower. Users also see room for improvement in DevOps tools and monetization features, along with requiring better documentation and cloud capabilities. Amazon API Gateway could enhance user experience and integration, improve monitoring, and expand governance tools. Pricing and latency issues are noted, as well as interface enhancements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM API Connect is flexible across environments like on-premises and hybrid but has a complex deployment process needing technical expertise. Customer service is responsive but could benefit from better support documentation. Amazon API Gateway excels in cloud environments with seamless AWS integration. Deployment is typically user-friendly, though customer support could improve in resolving queries swiftly.
Pricing and ROI: IBM API Connect is a high-cost solution with a comprehensive feature suite beneficial for large enterprises. Its pricing model is complex, but the ROI is considerable when duly leveraged. Amazon API Gateway follows a flexible, pay-as-you-go model seen as cost-effective, especially with variable traffic, though costs can rise with higher data volumes. It provides ROI through enhanced API management and operational efficiency.
API Gateway saves time and secures my infrastructure, allowing effective deployment.
Reducing development hours from eighty to four for an API was possible due to reusing existing scripts from DataPower.
I have seen a return on investment from using IBM API Connect, as we created multiple plans based on customer usage.
Technical support is excellent, deserving a ten out of ten rating.
We benefit from enterprise support, ensuring prompt responses from the technical support team.
We encountered challenges accessing technical support channels, such as a need for a clear telephone number and chat sessions.
Support is excellent when it comes to APIC.
Support is extremely good, especially with Sev 1 issues.
There are one hundred thousand users using it in our company.
We have thousands of end users accessing our solution built on API Gateway.
Being a fully managed service, it offers auto-scalability and management by AWS.
With container versions, scaling up or down the gateways deployed into pods is a two to three-minute task for the operations team.
It is distributed among IBM MQ, IBM Ace, IBM DataPower, and IBM API Connect.
IBM API Connect's scalability is good, as you can handle it easily similar to how you manage cloud providers.
I've deployed it for a client with millions of users without issues.
Our applications are stable, owing partly to our architecture, which is spread across three regions.
I would rate its stability as nine out of ten.
The runtime engine for the APIC Gateway is still a DataPower component, which has been stable in the industry for about fifteen years.
If it is functioning well, you won't have a bad experience and your application becomes more reliable.
A local version of the API Gateway would be beneficial for testing purposes without incurring extra costs.
We use a lot of TerraForm scripts to build up our environment.
I would like to see more AI-based capabilities in future releases.
Examples include the lack of connectivity to MQ.
You need to know when traffic peaks, so use auto-scaling when traffic comes.
Connectivity to MQ is not available in IBM API Connect.
However, my understanding is that it easily goes to $14,000 or $15,000 USD each month for each account, and we have several such accounts.
It is a really cheap product, but if used incorrectly, it can become expensive.
It is expensive.
Pricing depends on how many instances run across environments.
The solution is solid, robust, and scalable.
The tool's most valuable aspect is its scalability.
works well for defining different states for different customers based on their purchase plans
It offers significant development efficiency, reducing man-hours from eighty to four when creating APIs.
We can add some policies to provide extra security, protect your backend, validate the consumers, and analyze based on the traffic limit to throw things out.
IBM API Connect has a designer and CLI features which can be used to completely automate the API.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Amazon API Gateway | 12.3% |
| IBM API Connect | 5.0% |
| Other | 82.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 61 |
Amazon API Gateway stands out for its seamless integration with AWS, ease of use, scalability, and support for secure API management, benefiting from a serverless architecture that helps control costs while ensuring efficient backend connectivity.
Amazon API Gateway offers significant capabilities for managing APIs, integrating smoothly with AWS Lambda for serverless operations. It provides robust security with authentication, authorization, and input validation. The gateway supports API traffic management, rate limiting, and enhances accessibility while facing areas for potential improvements in pricing, documentation, interface usability, monitoring, security, latency, analytics, and debugging tools. Expanded integration features and AI-based development aids are desirable.
What features make Amazon API Gateway effective?Amazon API Gateway is frequently employed in industries like mobile development and public services to ensure secure, efficient interactions between front-end and back-end systems. It's instrumental in managing APIs, integrating microservices, and offering controlled API access, notably in environments requiring robust security and service exposure.
IBM API Connect is an API management tool providing robust security, seamless REST and SOAP conversion, and flexible deployment options for diverse cloud environments. It aids organizations in securing and monetizing their APIs while streamlining the development process.
IBM API Connect offers features like a security gateway, API lifecycle management, and integration with DataPower. Its intuitive interface enhances ease of use, supporting extensive analytics and traffic management. However, there are areas for improvement in automation, system integration, and user configuration. Organizations can deploy API Connect on-premises or in the cloud, delivering secure access control and analytics for banking, financial services, and government sectors. Compliance with standards like PSD2 ensures secure external API exposure and integration with multiple systems.
What are the most important features of IBM API Connect?In specific industries like banking, financial services, and government sectors, IBM API Connect plays a crucial role in API management, orchestration, and regulation tasks. It provides secure access, control, and compliance with industry standards, serving as an essential gateway for data exchange and integration across multiple systems.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.