Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon API Gateway vs IBM API Connect comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.3
ROI from Amazon API Gateway varies, but its pay-per-use model is cost-efficient and valuable for many users.
Sentiment score
6.5
IBM API Connect enabled rapid microservices development, enhancing governance, security, and integration, yielding significant financial and operational benefits within two years.
If the cost of developing the service on your own is higher than the cost of using the API gateway, then the ROI will be great.
We've seen value in using the solution.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
Amazon API Gateway's support is efficient, praised for knowledgeable staff, despite challenges in access and potential high costs.
Sentiment score
6.4
IBM API Connect's support is generally good but varies in speed and effectiveness, depending on location and ticket severity.
Within 15 minutes, we had a support engineer allocated via Amazon, and we were able to resolve the issue promptly.
You open a chat, have your response, know what to do or what is wrong, and can resolve the problem.
If you have a tier-one partnership, the support has been phenomenal.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Amazon API Gateway is praised for its scalability, auto-scaling features, and ability to efficiently handle high traffic volumes.
Sentiment score
7.4
IBM API Connect is praised for its high scalability and reliability, though customization and infrastructure costs may vary.
We have around 600 APIs working right now.
Our company has around 4,000 to 5,000 concurrent users per year and sometimes up to 10,000 to 15,000.
You don't need to worry about the scalability of Amazon API Gateway because AWS takes responsibility for the solution's scalability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.7
Amazon API Gateway is highly stable and reliable, achieving a 99.99% uptime, efficiently handling large-scale deployments.
Sentiment score
7.2
IBM API Connect is generally stable and reliable, particularly in newer versions, with most users rating its stability highly.
I've deployed it for a client with millions of users without issues.
Our applications are stable, owing partly to our architecture, which is spread across three regions.
I've not encountered unavailability or any issue that became a disaster.
 

Room For Improvement

Amazon API Gateway faces challenges in pricing, support, documentation, usability, security, integration, and lacks advanced features and tools.
IBM API Connect needs better microservices, documentation, monetization, setup, multi-cloud support, development, debugging, security, automation, hybrid cloud, and performance.
They need to be able to validate the signature at the API gateway level.
A local version of the API Gateway would be beneficial for testing purposes without incurring extra costs.
I would like a feature that can validate requests and filter out any jQuery injections.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users debate Amazon API Gateway's cost-effectiveness, citing varied experiences with pricing based on data volume and complexity.
IBM API Connect pricing is high, escalating in cloud deployments, with some users suggesting a 20-30% cost reduction.
It is very affordable.
With Amazon API Gateway, you pay for what you use.
However, my understanding is that it easily goes to $14,000 or $15,000 USD each month for each account, and we have several such accounts.
 

Valuable Features

Amazon API Gateway delivers secure, scalable API management, easy AWS integration, flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and user-friendly interface simplicity.
IBM API Connect offers a robust interface, enhanced security, seamless integration, and comprehensive management tools for efficient API lifecycle and performance.
Rest API provides robust and more secure authentication features.
Additionally, it's cost-effective, even as our workload and the number of APIs we manage have increased.
It acts as a master tool, offering easy configuration and excellent integration capabilities with third-party services.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon API Gateway
Ranking in API Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM API Connect
Ranking in API Management
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
75
Ranking in other categories
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Amazon API Gateway is 14.6%, down from 14.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM API Connect is 6.5%, up from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

Dinesh Agrawalla - PeerSpot reviewer
Requires minimal configuration and easy-to-launch
I would like to improve the restrictions and security elements of the solution, as there are certain configurations that are not currently supported. There are certain restrictions that cannot be implemented without web access. In the next release, I would like a feature that can validate requests and filter out any jQuery injections. Additionally, I would like to prioritize these requests. I've noticed that such features are usually not available in web applications.
Shanmugasundaram Shanmuganathan - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers basic API orchestration and provides robust security and governance features
While Azure API Management offers configurable scalability, IBM API Connect relies on Kubernetes clusters. This might seem manual and require defining cluster instances upfront, but it's completely customizable and not on-the-fly scaling. It's completely custom-driven, not on-the-fly scaling, which some may consider cumbersome. Overall, I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. Almost all applications we've been exposing lately go through this middleware, so it's used extensively. There are around sixty applications directly using it, but six Kubernetes clusters serve those applications. It's heavily used for integration, including system-to-system integration and product integrations. Our usage has been increasing year-on-year based on our needs.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
Educational Organization
21%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Insurance Company
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Apigee or Amazon API Gateway?
Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring, ma...
How does Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager compare with Amazon API Gateway?
I have found that Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is the best integration tool out there for API management. It is easy to implement and learn; it provides several options for deployment, (including ...
Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?
If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...
What do you like most about IBM API Connect?
Publishers can easily identify, create, and publish APIs on the developer portal, defining plans, packages, and potentially billing rules.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM API Connect?
Price depends on many factors like size of the deal, competitive factors, timing, customer profile or where the pricing for API Calls is very competitive comparing to any of the leader players.
What needs improvement with IBM API Connect?
The only downside where improvements are needed is probably on the licensing side. Scalability is an issue with IBM API Connect, making it an area where improvements are required.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Fox Digital Consumer Group, iFlix, UK Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA), Miovision, Olympusat, PhotoVogue, Royale International Group, Veracode
Heineken, Tine, Finologee, Axis Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon API Gateway vs. IBM API Connect and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.