Layer7 API Management and Amazon API Gateway compete in the API management and security market. Amazon API Gateway is often seen as having an advantage due to its seamless integration with AWS services and serverless architecture, offering a compelling advantage for businesses already using AWS.
Features:Layer7 API Management is recognized for robust security features including protocol and token translation support. It easily handles REST-to-SOAP conversions and integrates well with identity management systems. Amazon API Gateway is highly valued for seamless AWS service integration, security features like WAF, and its serverless architecture ensuring scalability for AWS users.
Room for Improvement:Layer7 API Management users highlight the need for better testing modules, enhanced developer portals, and improved integration with third-party systems. There is also a call for more customization options and a streamlined migration process. Amazon API Gateway is critiqued for its cost, complexity in full AWS ecosystem integration, and lack of built-in developer portals.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Layer7 API Management offers flexible deployment options in on-premises and hybrid environments, with noted support from its technical team, although some decline has been observed post-Broadcom acquisition. Amazon API Gateway's cloud-based deployment is convenient for AWS users, with customer service praised for responsiveness and efficiency.
Pricing and ROI:Layer7 API Management is priced competitively but can be expensive for smaller businesses. Its pricing is justified by the security and features provided. Amazon API Gateway uses a pay-as-you-go model, appealing for scalability and aligning with varying workloads, though it can become costly at higher request volumes. Both offer a positive ROI, though Layer7's initial costs may delay its benefits.
API Gateway saves time and secures my infrastructure, allowing effective deployment.
Within 15 minutes, we had a support engineer allocated via Amazon, and we were able to resolve the issue promptly.
Technical support is excellent, deserving a ten out of ten rating.
You open a chat, have your response, know what to do or what is wrong, and can resolve the problem.
Technical support is excellent, and I would rate them as ten.
You don't need to worry about the scalability of Amazon API Gateway because AWS takes responsibility for the solution's scalability.
It is very scalable, and we don't need to hire additional engineers.
We've significantly increased our traffic from hitting it once or twice a minute to now hitting it ten to fifteen times within a minute.
All nodes communicate with one primary database, affecting connections and causing crashes under high load.
I've deployed it for a client with millions of users without issues.
Our applications are stable, owing partly to our architecture, which is spread across three regions.
I've not encountered unavailability or any issue that became a disaster.
Without rebooting for ninety to one hundred eighty days, cache builds up in Linux boxes, causing memory utilization issues.
A local version of the API Gateway would be beneficial for testing purposes without incurring extra costs.
I would appreciate more comprehensive telemetry information, diagnostics, and improved monitoring capabilities for the services and endpoints.
Apigee has the cloud EPG Microgateway resource, which can be put inside our Kubernetes cluster.
Broadcom's push for upgrades from version nine to ten, ten to 10.3, and onwards to twelve needs improvement in migration processes, especially with service dependencies.
With Amazon API Gateway, you pay for what you use.
However, my understanding is that it easily goes to $14,000 or $15,000 USD each month for each account, and we have several such accounts.
It is a really cheap product, but if used incorrectly, it can become expensive.
Seeing other products makes the tool's pricing seem high.
Rest API provides robust and more secure authentication features.
Additionally, it's cost-effective, even as our workload and the number of APIs we manage have increased.
It acts as a master tool, offering easy configuration and excellent integration capabilities with third-party services.
The flexibility to develop APIs for various platforms, from front-end applications to ATM machines, is valuable.
Amazon API Gateway facilitates internal APIs exposure to external users, manages requests, and enhances security with authentication. It efficiently handles serverless architectures with AWS Lambda integration, supporting cloud-based API management.
Amazon API Gateway acts as a gateway for backend microservices, making it suitable for real-time use cases. It enables secure communication, traffic routing, and access control management. With its strength in integrating AWS services, it offers excellent scalability, proxy capabilities, and cost-effective management. Users have noted areas for improvement, such as pricing, interface, and the need for better AI-based capabilities. Improvements are also sought in monitoring, security features, and support services.
What features make Amazon API Gateway stand out?Industries utilize Amazon API Gateway to streamline operations in sectors like finance, healthcare, and tech, focusing on real-time data processing and secure communication. The gateway's ability to manage traffic and provide robust security features is key in industries requiring dependable and versatile API management solutions.
Layer7 API Management is a comprehensive solution that enables organizations to securely expose, manage, and monetize their APIs.
It provides features such as API gateway, developer portal, analytics, and security to ensure seamless integration and control over API traffic.
With Layer7 API Management, businesses can streamline their API operations and drive innovation.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
