

MuleSoft API Manager and Amazon API Gateway compete in the API management category. MuleSoft appears to have the upper hand due to its vast connector ecosystem and advanced policy management, while Amazon API Gateway is preferred for seamless AWS integration and serverless deployment.
Features: MuleSoft API Manager offers a large array of connectors for seamless integration with Salesforce and ERP systems, advanced policy management, and a low-code environment. Amazon API Gateway offers simple scalability, seamless integration with AWS services like Lambda and Cognito, and solid security features.
Room for Improvement: MuleSoft API Manager could improve by reducing its high licensing fees, simplifying its complex setup, and enhancing automation tools. Amazon API Gateway may benefit from improved user documentation, simplifying configuration, and reducing high costs associated with data processing.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft API Manager provides versatile deployment options including private, hybrid, and public clouds and enjoys a good customer service reputation, though complex inquiries handling may improve. Amazon API Gateway, mainly deployed in public cloud, offers easy AWS integration and is praised for its responsive customer service.
Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft's pricing is higher with a complex subscription model based on usage, yielding positive ROI due to its comprehensive platform capabilities. Amazon API Gateway's pay-as-you-go model offers flexibility but can be costly with high data volumes, yet generally reports positive ROI.
API Gateway saves time and secures my infrastructure, allowing effective deployment.
This iPaaS platform with CloudHub eliminates variable infrastructure-related costs and saves enterprises on connectivity and operations costs, as everything comes bundled from the MuleSoft side.
Technical support is excellent, deserving a ten out of ten rating.
With the enterprise plan, there is a set SLA.
Understanding the specific business context can be challenging, especially when using multiple accounts.
Our enterprise pays for a special success program, which provides priority support.
They can be slow in addressing security vulnerabilities.
If bug fixing is required for downtimes or issues, we receive prompt support with alternative solutions or workarounds.
Amazon API Gateway exhibits satisfying scalability.
If the business management agrees to scale out, it's easy and fast using coded infrastructure with Terraform scripts.
In terms of scalability, you need to add components like CloudFront if it deals with static data.
Regarding availability, especially with iPaaS solutions, they guarantee 99.99%.
Our applications are stable, owing partly to our architecture, which is spread across three regions.
I would rate its stability as nine out of ten.
Amazon API Gateway has proven to be very stable, with a stability rating of ten out of ten.
There was an issue when trying to implement a request-reply pattern using JMS, which was not functioning as expected despite being documented.
A local version of the API Gateway would be beneficial for testing purposes without incurring extra costs.
The solution should include change data capture (CDC) features that will help reduce workload.
At scale, it is expensive, and latency sometimes occurs.
Introducing features related to auto governance without manual effort would make the API Manager smarter and more efficient for enterprises with complex landscapes.
Managing the cost of MuleSoft, particularly the billing model based on the number of active cores/threads, has been challenging.
I see some gaps for improvement in MuleSoft API Manager.
However, my understanding is that it easily goes to $14,000 or $15,000 USD each month for each account, and we have several such accounts.
It is a really cheap product, but if used incorrectly, it can become expensive.
It is expensive.
The major challenge they face is the high pricing, which has become notable especially since they transitioned from a VCore to a usage-based subscription.
The pricing is high, which is the biggest point where some customers are hesitant about adopting it.
The cost for using MuleSoft is approximately $500,000 USD per year.
works well for defining different states for different customers based on their purchase plans
A most valuable feature of Amazon API Gateway is how quickly we can connect to backend services and have APIs accessible from anywhere.
It handles security and other headaches, keeping our database and servers secure.
MuleSoft's ability to connect to third-party monitoring platforms like AWS, Datadog, and Elastic makes operational analysis more efficient.
I am satisfied with combining all APIs in one place, and the monitoring capabilities in MuleSoft API Manager for all my APIs are useful for operational efficiency.
It also enables us to create additional layers of authentication, like integrating external providers for OAuth, within reduced timelines.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Amazon API Gateway | 11.1% |
| MuleSoft API Manager | 4.3% |
| Other | 84.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 44 |
Amazon API Gateway stands out for its seamless integration with AWS, ease of use, scalability, and support for secure API management, benefiting from a serverless architecture that helps control costs while ensuring efficient backend connectivity.
Amazon API Gateway offers significant capabilities for managing APIs, integrating smoothly with AWS Lambda for serverless operations. It provides robust security with authentication, authorization, and input validation. The gateway supports API traffic management, rate limiting, and enhances accessibility while facing areas for potential improvements in pricing, documentation, interface usability, monitoring, security, latency, analytics, and debugging tools. Expanded integration features and AI-based development aids are desirable.
What features make Amazon API Gateway effective?Amazon API Gateway is frequently employed in industries like mobile development and public services to ensure secure, efficient interactions between front-end and back-end systems. It's instrumental in managing APIs, integrating microservices, and offering controlled API access, notably in environments requiring robust security and service exposure.
MuleSoft API Manager offers a user-friendly platform with comprehensive integration capabilities, strong security, and scalable architecture. It's designed to streamline API management and development processes through robust analytics and a rich interface.
MuleSoft API Manager stands out with its lightweight design, offering extensive connector libraries and ease of applying policies via drag-and-drop functionality. Its robust analytics enhance operational efficiency. Users can implement custom policies, benefit from advanced integration needs like OAuth authentication, and manage extensive API inventories. While facing challenges like high costs and complex upgrades, MuleSoft API Manager is vital for managing APIs across sectors, supporting data exchange between systems such as SAP and Salesforce, and modernizing legacy systems.
What are the standout features of MuleSoft API Manager?MuleSoft API Manager is widely implemented in sectors seeking to integrate services like SAP and Salesforce quickly and securely. Its use in automating processes and enhancing API governance makes it a go-to API gateway. Organizations rely on it to modernize systems and manage interconnectivity, facilitating traffic control and robust policy management.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.