MuleSoft API Manager and Amazon API Gateway compete in the API management solutions category. MuleSoft holds the upper hand with strong integration capabilities and scalable solutions, while Amazon API Gateway excels in AWS integration and cost-effective pricing models.
Features: MuleSoft API Manager stands out with policy management, scalability supported by extensive connectors, and a user-friendly drag-and-drop UI. It effectively manages public and private APIs with integrated security features. Amazon API Gateway offers seamless AWS service integration, robust security features like IAM, and efficient handling of large traffic volumes. Additionally, its serverless architecture with native AWS service integration is a significant advantage.
Room for Improvement: MuleSoft can improve in BPM/workflow, better business analytics, and user-friendly interface design. It can be heavy to manage and has high costs due to limited openness. Amazon API Gateway's user interface and technical support could be enhanced, with more comprehensive documentation and improved governance features. Its complex setup requires in-depth AWS knowledge, which can be a barrier to many users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft offers flexible deployment models, including private, public, and hybrid clouds. However, its customer service is often more sales-focused. Amazon API Gateway provides consistent support with a strong emphasis on customer service, reflecting in its streamlined support experience. Both offer global support with responsive service teams.
Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft has higher licensing fees which may increase with additional features, offering high reusability that leads to long-term ROI. Amazon API Gateway uses a flexible pay-as-you-go model, appealing to those aligning usage with spending. Though high data processing can increase costs, it generally offers better value, particularly in AWS environments. MuleSoft requires a larger initial investment, whereas Amazon API Gateway is more accommodating to budget-conscious users.
API Gateway saves time and secures my infrastructure, allowing effective deployment.
Within 15 minutes, we had a support engineer allocated via Amazon, and we were able to resolve the issue promptly.
Technical support is excellent, deserving a ten out of ten rating.
Many common cases are already covered through guides and resources.
Our enterprise pays for a special success program, which provides priority support.
They can be slow in addressing security vulnerabilities.
We've significantly increased our traffic from hitting it once or twice a minute to now hitting it ten to fifteen times within a minute.
I haven't observed any significant issues indicating a lack of scalability, as it can be efficiently managed through configurations.
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
I've deployed it for a client with millions of users without issues.
Our applications are stable, owing partly to our architecture, which is spread across three regions.
I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.
There was an issue when trying to implement a request-reply pattern using JMS, which was not functioning as expected despite being documented.
A local version of the API Gateway would be beneficial for testing purposes without incurring extra costs.
It's important to consider the type of gateway endpoint carefully.
Although I find AWS API Gateway better than Oracle in many aspects, the network connectivity challenges force us to consider using Oracle API Gateway for our new product, LOS (Load Origination System).
Introducing features related to auto governance without manual effort would make the API Manager smarter and more efficient for enterprises with complex landscapes.
Managing the cost of MuleSoft, particularly the billing model based on the number of active cores/threads, has been challenging.
However, my understanding is that it easily goes to $14,000 or $15,000 USD each month for each account, and we have several such accounts.
It is a really cheap product, but if used incorrectly, it can become expensive.
It is expensive.
The cost for using MuleSoft is approximately $500,000 USD per year.
MuleSoft is typically more expensive compared to using Java or Spring Boot APIs hosted in containers.
Additionally, it's cost-effective, even as our workload and the number of APIs we manage have increased.
It acts as a master tool, offering easy configuration and excellent integration capabilities with third-party services.
The solution is solid, robust, and scalable.
MuleSoft's ability to connect to third-party monitoring platforms like AWS, Datadog, and Elastic makes operational analysis more efficient.
It also enables us to create additional layers of authentication, like integrating external providers for OAuth, within reduced timelines.
Amazon API Gateway facilitates internal APIs exposure to external users, manages requests, and enhances security with authentication. It efficiently handles serverless architectures with AWS Lambda integration, supporting cloud-based API management.
Amazon API Gateway acts as a gateway for backend microservices, making it suitable for real-time use cases. It enables secure communication, traffic routing, and access control management. With its strength in integrating AWS services, it offers excellent scalability, proxy capabilities, and cost-effective management. Users have noted areas for improvement, such as pricing, interface, and the need for better AI-based capabilities. Improvements are also sought in monitoring, security features, and support services.
What features make Amazon API Gateway stand out?Industries utilize Amazon API Gateway to streamline operations in sectors like finance, healthcare, and tech, focusing on real-time data processing and secure communication. The gateway's ability to manage traffic and provide robust security features is key in industries requiring dependable and versatile API management solutions.
Mulesoft API Manager is the portion of the Anypoint Platform that is used for the designing, building, managing, and publishing of APIs. Anypoint Platform uses Mule as its core runtime engine.
Mulesoft API Manager is an extremely versatile solution. It offers users the ability to deploy their APIs in a number of different settings. You can use API Manager on a public cloud, a private cloud, or a hybrid. Additionally, users can use the solution to manage their deployments with ease. A few clicks are all you need to alter your deployment.
Benefits of Mulesoft API Manager
Some of the benefits of using Mulesoft API Manager include:
Reviews from Real Users
Mulesoft API Manager is a highly effective piece of software whose purpose is to enable users to design, build, manage, and publish APIs. It stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are the ease with which users can connect it to their applications and the high level of value that its support offers. It provides users with the ability to easily connect this solution with whatever program they need to join it with. Users can create connections without having to write code. It offers different types of support which ensure that users have a high level of understanding about the product and how to use it.
PeerSpot user Tolulope A., a technical lead specializing in integration and middleware at a financial services firm, notes the ease with which users can connect Mulesoft API Manager to their applications. He writes, “One good thing about MuleSoft is that they have a lot of connectors to those back-end applications. We don't really need to write code to be able to connect to a database or to connect with SAP. You just need credentials and the connectivity details. Most of the development of what we do is just drag and drop. They're able to connect with applications using standard connectors that are provided by ESB, by MuleSoft.”
The CEO & Co-Founder at a computer retailer notes the value of Mulesoft’s supporting documentation. They write, “The documentation is great; it is always up-to-date and well-presented. If any details are missing, then there is a blog available that contains a lot of details. There are also channels on YouTube to help you better understand the solution and what some of the processes look like.”
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.