MuleSoft API Manager and Amazon API Gateway compete in the API management and integration category. MuleSoft provides extensive control and customization, whereas Amazon offers scalability and cost-effectiveness.
Features: MuleSoft API Manager provides robust integration capabilities with a rich library of connectors and a flexible integration platform, excelling in API development, security, analytics, and policy management. Amazon API Gateway is notable for its scalability and simplicity, with seamless integration with AWS services and a pay-for-what-you-use pricing model, effective for serverless architectures with strong built-in security features.
Room for Improvement: Challenges for MuleSoft API Manager include high pricing, complex initial setup, limited policy automation, and the need for better documentation and support. Amazon API Gateway could benefit from improved documentation, integrated analytics features, a user-friendly interface, and clearer pricing details. MuleSoft requires enhancements in scalability and user interface, while Amazon could better support complex use cases.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft API Manager offers public, private, and hybrid cloud deployment models, while Amazon API Gateway is focused on public and hybrid cloud, aligning with AWS services but lacking on-premises options. MuleSoft provides professional services but may prioritize business interests over customer concerns, whereas Amazon is praised for strong customer success and responsive service.
Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft API Manager is viewed as expensive due to its core usage licensing model, offering a comprehensive suite justifying its price. Amazon API Gateway offers a pay-per-use pricing structure, making it affordable for varying demand levels, providing strong ROI. MuleSoft may have higher initial expenditure but provides long-term value, whereas Amazon's pricing flexibility impacts cost management positively.
API Gateway saves time and secures my infrastructure, allowing effective deployment.
Within 15 minutes, we had a support engineer allocated via Amazon, and we were able to resolve the issue promptly.
Technical support is excellent, deserving a ten out of ten rating.
You open a chat, have your response, know what to do or what is wrong, and can resolve the problem.
Our enterprise pays for a special success program, which provides priority support.
They can be slow in addressing security vulnerabilities.
You don't need to worry about the scalability of Amazon API Gateway because AWS takes responsibility for the solution's scalability.
It is very scalable, and we don't need to hire additional engineers.
We've significantly increased our traffic from hitting it once or twice a minute to now hitting it ten to fifteen times within a minute.
I've deployed it for a client with millions of users without issues.
Our applications are stable, owing partly to our architecture, which is spread across three regions.
I've not encountered unavailability or any issue that became a disaster.
There was an issue when trying to implement a request-reply pattern using JMS, which was not functioning as expected despite being documented.
A local version of the API Gateway would be beneficial for testing purposes without incurring extra costs.
I would appreciate more comprehensive telemetry information, diagnostics, and improved monitoring capabilities for the services and endpoints.
Apigee has the cloud EPG Microgateway resource, which can be put inside our Kubernetes cluster.
Introducing features related to auto governance without manual effort would make the API Manager smarter and more efficient for enterprises with complex landscapes.
Managing the cost of MuleSoft, particularly the billing model based on the number of active cores/threads, has been challenging.
With Amazon API Gateway, you pay for what you use.
However, my understanding is that it easily goes to $14,000 or $15,000 USD each month for each account, and we have several such accounts.
It is a really cheap product, but if used incorrectly, it can become expensive.
The cost for using MuleSoft is approximately $500,000 USD per year.
MuleSoft is typically more expensive compared to using Java or Spring Boot APIs hosted in containers.
Rest API provides robust and more secure authentication features.
Additionally, it's cost-effective, even as our workload and the number of APIs we manage have increased.
It acts as a master tool, offering easy configuration and excellent integration capabilities with third-party services.
MuleSoft's ability to connect to third-party monitoring platforms like AWS, Datadog, and Elastic makes operational analysis more efficient.
It also enables us to create additional layers of authentication, like integrating external providers for OAuth, within reduced timelines.
Amazon API Gateway facilitates internal APIs exposure to external users, manages requests, and enhances security with authentication. It efficiently handles serverless architectures with AWS Lambda integration, supporting cloud-based API management.
Amazon API Gateway acts as a gateway for backend microservices, making it suitable for real-time use cases. It enables secure communication, traffic routing, and access control management. With its strength in integrating AWS services, it offers excellent scalability, proxy capabilities, and cost-effective management. Users have noted areas for improvement, such as pricing, interface, and the need for better AI-based capabilities. Improvements are also sought in monitoring, security features, and support services.
What features make Amazon API Gateway stand out?Industries utilize Amazon API Gateway to streamline operations in sectors like finance, healthcare, and tech, focusing on real-time data processing and secure communication. The gateway's ability to manage traffic and provide robust security features is key in industries requiring dependable and versatile API management solutions.
Mulesoft API Manager is the portion of the Anypoint Platform that is used for the designing, building, managing, and publishing of APIs. Anypoint Platform uses Mule as its core runtime engine.
Mulesoft API Manager is an extremely versatile solution. It offers users the ability to deploy their APIs in a number of different settings. You can use API Manager on a public cloud, a private cloud, or a hybrid. Additionally, users can use the solution to manage their deployments with ease. A few clicks are all you need to alter your deployment.
Benefits of Mulesoft API Manager
Some of the benefits of using Mulesoft API Manager include:
Reviews from Real Users
Mulesoft API Manager is a highly effective piece of software whose purpose is to enable users to design, build, manage, and publish APIs. It stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are the ease with which users can connect it to their applications and the high level of value that its support offers. It provides users with the ability to easily connect this solution with whatever program they need to join it with. Users can create connections without having to write code. It offers different types of support which ensure that users have a high level of understanding about the product and how to use it.
PeerSpot user Tolulope A., a technical lead specializing in integration and middleware at a financial services firm, notes the ease with which users can connect Mulesoft API Manager to their applications. He writes, “One good thing about MuleSoft is that they have a lot of connectors to those back-end applications. We don't really need to write code to be able to connect to a database or to connect with SAP. You just need credentials and the connectivity details. Most of the development of what we do is just drag and drop. They're able to connect with applications using standard connectors that are provided by ESB, by MuleSoft.”
The CEO & Co-Founder at a computer retailer notes the value of Mulesoft’s supporting documentation. They write, “The documentation is great; it is always up-to-date and well-presented. If any details are missing, then there is a blog available that contains a lot of details. There are also channels on YouTube to help you better understand the solution and what some of the processes look like.”
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.