IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

IBM and SAP are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. IBM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 10.0, while SAP is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2. IBM holds a 14.3% mindshare in BBM, compared to SAP’s 9.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of SAP users who would recommend it.

IBM Sterling B2B Integratio...

Read 8 IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services reviews

1,393 Views
1,152 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 32 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

2,669 Views
1,114 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

IBM Sterling B2B Integratio...

SAP Process Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

SAP Process Orchestration and IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services are competing products for enterprise integration needs. SAP Process Orchestration is favored for pricing and support, whereas IBM Sterling's features often justify its cost due to robust B2B transaction management.

Features: SAP Process Orchestration offers seamless integration with SAP applications, supports various messaging protocols, and provides robust process automation capabilities. IBM Sterling focuses on comprehensive B2B integration, superior transaction management, and scalability. SAP Process Orchestration is preferable for SAP-focused environments, while IBM Sterling suits diverse global B2B networks.

Room for Improvement: SAP Process Orchestration could enhance its flexibility outside SAP environments, improve non-SAP application integration, and simplify configurations. IBM Sterling could optimize deployment time, reduce complexity in partner ecosystem management, and offer more intuitive user interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Process Orchestration simplifies deployment within the SAP ecosystem but may require SAP-specific expertise. IBM Sterling offers flexible configurations and extensive support for intricate B2B processes, with a reputation for addressing B2B integration challenges efficiently.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Process Orchestration's costs align with standard enterprise solutions, providing a better ROI for SAP-centric companies. IBM Sterling requires a higher initial investment due to its features but can deliver substantial ROI for businesses needing advanced B2B transaction management.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. SAP Process Orchestration Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. SAP Process Orchestration

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 837,501 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Sterling B2B Integratio...

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Process Orchestration

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services is 14.3%, up from 10.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Process Orchestration is 9.0%, down from 13.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

Joshua Rule

Senior Integration Consultant at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Comes with real-time integration suite and best security

We use the product in an integrated environment where the client needs a variety of different file transfer protocols as well as an integrated file translation service IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services offers the best security. The product's most valuable feature is the real-time…

Read full review

Laxman Molugu

Chief Executive Officer at Saanvi systems inc

Enhances operational efficiency with valuable prepackaged content and cost-effective pricing

For organizations that operate within an SAP ecosystem, SAP Process Orchestration is recommended due to its cost-effectiveness and the availability of valuable prepackaged content. It is important to consider the needs of your industry, as SAP Process Orchestration may not meet all requirements in consumer-oriented sectors. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"They have multiple features for each kind of task and issue. The company has different channels to give information to the administration. Security and integration capabilities are also important. This product has helped to replace a lot of other solutions, saving time and cost."

"The product's most valuable feature is the real-time integration suite."

"The solution is extremely scalable."

"We are able to monitor all B2B messages, and we are able to see or track each message on it from an error perspective. That's a good side of it. It is working well, and we're able to do our current job."

"They have best-in-class, quality support."

"The monitoring tools are the most valuable feature."

"It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs."

"t is a pretty stable solution. I have not seen any outages in the solution."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"In my opinion, SAP PO is the most mature suite of tools to integrate processes across SAP environments at this moment. It's really unbeatable because it allows you to integrate whatever scenarios you can imagine."

"The main benefit is that the solution is low maintenance. Moreover, it's the license cost is very low because it's part of the package. The maintenance is standard maintenance. And the updates are regular. So there's a regular update and you can choose whether you want to do those updates or not."

"The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems."

"With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

Cons

"It can be now classified as a legacy system because there are no more updates. From what I know, there will be no updates for the current version, which is an issue. Therefore, we are looking for a compatible new software that we can use. We're currently researching what is there in the market. We would consider something that would give us better speed on our current processor. There is also room for improvement in terms of its scalability and GUI. It is an old system, and its scalability can be improved. Its GUI can also be more appealing."

"Onboarding on the solution is complex. It's hard to onboard partners and customer suppliers. It's one aspect that is not that straightforward."

"They can improve APIs because they are still lagging behind in API connectivity. With non-API connectivity, they're market leaders, but API connectivity, they're still in the immature space."

"The only weaknesses they have different governance for each task and different channels for communication which are hard to maintain. The relation of the company with other companies can be improved. We have a lot of customers who this platform for the interchange of information which can also be improved. The compliance information about banks can also be updated."

"The product roadmap suggests it will approach the end of support in several years, and a lot of innovations are now implemented by SAP not in SAP PO, but in SAP Integration Suite, hence, the platform is stable, but doesn't receive a lot of new features in recent updates."

"Process Orchestration doesn't provide authentication for data sent to us, meaning we have to rely on client certificate-based or basic authentication."

"SAP needs to improve a lot in terms of the orchestration part so that more adapters can be provided to users, which are areas where the solution has downsides."

"The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved."

"Data modeling is an area of concern in the product where improvements are required."

"The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users."

"The solution could be more scalable."

"SAP Process Orchestration could improve from an API standpoint. This is not an API management tool, which is one of its drawbacks. However, SAP has released an SAP Cloud Platform Integration which has all of the features, such as API management along with process integration to replace what they had previously."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They have a good pricing system, in relation to powerful features."

"The tool is expensive because of its rich features."

"Pricing is a little bit on the higher side because they give you the best support. Out of ten, I would rate pricing at seven or eight."

"The pricing depends on what type of client you are with SAP and the contract you have. There is a licensing cost that needs to be paid."

"The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."

"There are fees in addition to the licensing."

"It's not an expensive solution."

"Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."

"We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable."

"It is a very expensive solution. We only pay for the license."

"The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services?

The product's most valuable feature is the real-time integration suite.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services?

The tool is expensive because of its rich features.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services?

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services needs to improve API management. It needs to incorporate a better and more stable use of AS3 software.

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

The main concern is the cost. If additional help is needed due to lack of skill, we have to pay for SAP support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

There are two main areas for improvement: performance and cost. The cost is quite high, and if it were reduced, it might also improve the performance, potentially allowing us to access a more effic...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM B2B Integrator vs IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services

Compared 16% of the time

webMethods.io vs IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services

Compared 15% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services

Compared 13% of the time

Mule ESB vs IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText Trading Grid vs IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services Competitors

SAP Data Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 18% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 15% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 12% of the time

IBM App Connect vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 6% of the time

Workato vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services

February 2025

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services report

Download IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

January 2025

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

Overview

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services are designed to alleviate the burden on internal resources by providing secure connectivity and collaboration with your customers, suppliers, and business partners. The solution is built on the cloud-based B2B integration and visibility capabilities of IBM Sterling B2B Collaboration Network and provides comprehensive service offerings for partner onboarding, B2B process management, and trading partner support.

Facilitate growth by rapidly growing and adapting your B2B community without burdening internal resources and capital
Reduce B2B total cost of ownership by reducing the cost and increasing the reliability of B2B operations

Accelerate B2B collaboration with global customers and suppliers by leveraging our B2B expertise.

IBM

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

SAP

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Buyer's Guide

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. SAP Process Orchestration

January 2025

Free Report: IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. SAP Process Orchestration

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. SAP Process Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.