SAP Process Orchestration is considered to be cheaper than other middleware solutions up to a certain volume level. It is notably less expensive than alternatives like MuleSoft.
The product is not a low-priced solution, but I can say that it is competitively priced in the market. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges associated with the product.
SAP Process Orchestration Team Lead at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
2024-07-09T16:17:13Z
Jul 9, 2024
Normally, you will have to choose CPU-based licensing. I don't know the tool's actual cost, but it is expensive compared to other solutions or its direct competitors. Compared with the other integration platforms, the functionalities and stability in SAP Process Orchestration are aspects we need to consider. I rate the tool price a five out of ten.
AVP IT at a construction company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
2024-01-19T09:39:20Z
Jan 19, 2024
We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable. We find that the cost is even more affordable compared to other options available in the market.
My company deals with different pricing models of the product, according to which we don't pay for the solution directly, but we do pay for the maintenance part.
Global Integration Lead & Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2021-09-20T15:54:35Z
Sep 20, 2021
Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive.
There are fees in addition to the licensing. If we want to use B2B, which we use for sending and receiving messages to EDA, then there is an additional charge. EDA is partners with B2B and you have to integrate them. You have to procure that separately because it is not included in the standard PO license. Everything else is by default and B2B is the only addon that we have to pay for it.
If you get a PO license, you have PI, BPM, BRM, etc. All of these tools can come in PO, or can be available in a single package under a single license. The licensing is based on a yearly contract. I'm unsure of what the exact costs are, however. Things like B2B adapters may cost extra, but other adapters are included in the cost.
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender...
The main concern is the cost. If additional help is needed due to lack of skill, we have to pay for SAP support.
SAP Process Orchestration is considered to be cheaper than other middleware solutions up to a certain volume level. It is notably less expensive than alternatives like MuleSoft.
The product is not a low-priced solution, but I can say that it is competitively priced in the market. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges associated with the product.
Normally, you will have to choose CPU-based licensing. I don't know the tool's actual cost, but it is expensive compared to other solutions or its direct competitors. Compared with the other integration platforms, the functionalities and stability in SAP Process Orchestration are aspects we need to consider. I rate the tool price a five out of ten.
We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable. We find that the cost is even more affordable compared to other options available in the market.
My company deals with different pricing models of the product, according to which we don't pay for the solution directly, but we do pay for the maintenance part.
It comes as a part of the SAP package, and no additional license is required. MuleSoft, on the other hand, is very costly.
The pricing depends on what type of client you are with SAP and the contract you have. There is a licensing cost that needs to be paid.
It is a very expensive solution. We only pay for the license.
The solution is highly-priced.
The fee for maintenance is costly.
The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable.
The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution.
Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive.
It's not an expensive solution.
There are fees in addition to the licensing. If we want to use B2B, which we use for sending and receiving messages to EDA, then there is an additional charge. EDA is partners with B2B and you have to integrate them. You have to procure that separately because it is not included in the standard PO license. Everything else is by default and B2B is the only addon that we have to pay for it.
The licensing costs are fair. There are no additional costs in addition to the standard licensing.
The pricing for this solution is fine.
If you get a PO license, you have PI, BPM, BRM, etc. All of these tools can come in PO, or can be available in a single package under a single license. The licensing is based on a yearly contract. I'm unsure of what the exact costs are, however. Things like B2B adapters may cost extra, but other adapters are included in the cost.
The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good.