Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
MuleSoft Composer Logo

Top 10 MuleSoft Composer Alternatives

Vendor: Salesforce
4.0 out of 5
Post review

Top MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to MuleSoft Composer based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), Zapier, and Jitterbit Harmony. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Salesforce Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Salesforce, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
MuleSoft Composer Logo
MuleSoft Composer Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)
4.0 out of 5
Informatica IDMC provides cost-effective data integration with strong customer support, appealing to enterprises focused on resource optimization. In comparison, MuleSoft Composer attracts businesses with its extensive connectors and simplified integration, ideal for achieving rapid deployment and flexibility across diverse systems.
Download Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. MuleSoft Composer Report
Informatica IDMC requires significant setup costs, while MuleSoft Composer offers a more economical initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Informatica IDMC requires significant setup costs, while MuleSoft Composer offers a more economical initial setup.
MuleSoft Composer Logo
Zapier
4.3 out of 5
MuleSoft Composer Logo
Zapier
4.3 out of 5
Zapier targets cost-effective automation with easy deployment, supporting over 3,000 app connections. In comparison, MuleSoft Composer offers robust features for enterprise-level integrations, handling complex workflows. A tech buyer might choose Zapier for budget efficiency or MuleSoft Composer for sophisticated, long-term solutions.
Download MuleSoft Composer vs. Zapier Report
Zapier offers a low setup cost, making it accessible for smaller teams, while MuleSoft Composer has a higher setup cost, reflecting its robust capabilities suited for large enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Zapier offers a low setup cost, making it accessible for smaller teams, while MuleSoft Composer has a higher setup cost, reflecting its robust capabilities suited for large enterprises.
MuleSoft Composer Logo
Jitterbit Harmony
4.3 out of 5
MuleSoft Composer Logo
Jitterbit Harmony
4.3 out of 5
Jitterbit Harmony is noted for its data transformation capabilities and pre-built connectors. In comparison, MuleSoft Composer excels with complex integrations and a broader range of connectors. Jitterbit Harmony is preferred for easier deployment and cost-effectiveness, while MuleSoft Composer is favored for comprehensive features and scalability.
Download Jitterbit Harmony vs. MuleSoft Composer Report
Jitterbit Harmony has a lower setup cost compared to MuleSoft Composer, which tends to be more expensive but offers extensive scalability options.
View comparison
Pricing
Jitterbit Harmony has a lower setup cost compared to MuleSoft Composer, which tends to be more expensive but offers extensive scalability options.

Related categories

Cloud Data Integration
Data Integration
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)