Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi iPaaS vs MuleSoft Composer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.3
Boomi iPaaS support is responsive and knowledgeable; users value speed, community access, and ongoing platform improvements despite minor issues.
No sentiment score available
Users commend MuleSoft Composer's responsive and professional customer service team for efficient problem-solving and quick resolution times.
Seamlessly meeting SLAs and providing excellent responses to challenges and issues related to interface and data connectivity.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.6
Boomi iPaaS faces challenges with limited API management, scripting, documentation, pricing, and interface, requiring performance and marketing improvements.
Sentiment score
7.5
MuleSoft Composer needs better platform integrations, interface, scalability, AI integration, and support for complex data and API sharing challenges.
The integration landscape has become complex, and having a data strategy with unified data models would make integration easier for any platform, including Boomi.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Boomi iPaaS is scalable and versatile, but pricing and configuration challenges emerge with high integration and complex tasks.
No sentiment score available
MuleSoft Composer is highly rated for scalability, efficiently managing varying data volumes and adaptable for organizations of all sizes.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Boomi iPaaS offers a cost-effective, usage-based licensing model, ideal for large-scale applications, though costs can quickly increase.
No sentiment score available
MuleSoft Composer is considered costly, especially in Brazil and India, with users recommending a 20%-30% price reduction.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Boomi iPaaS is stable with 99.99% availability, though high-volume integration issues lead some to prefer Jitterbit's interface.
No sentiment score available
Users find MuleSoft Composer stable and well-performing, despite occasional glitches quickly resolved by support.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.5
Boomi iPaaS excels in low-code integration, scalability, user-friendliness, extensive connectors, and delivers high ROI with efficient deployment.
Sentiment score
7.8
MuleSoft Composer offers Salesforce integration, ease of use, API sharing, prebuilt connectors, and effective data handling, monitoring, and notifications.
The most valuable features of Boomi are the integration capabilities, the Data Hub product, and the UDI integration.
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
MuleSoft Composer
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (27th), Cloud Data Integration (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Boomi iPaaS is 8.9%, up from 8.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 5.4%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Berniem Elfrink - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that is easy to use, cost-effective, and offers a large set of functionalities
I use Boomi AtomSphere Integration in my company to manage all types of integrations, including SAP integrations, database integrations, and other enterprise-level integrations The most valuable features of the solution are its mapping functionality and the low-code, no-code nature of the…
Prince Barai - PeerSpot reviewer
The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved
Our customer’s system is very old. We are trying to upgrade it. We are extracting data from the system and sending it to Salesforce. The product is a good option if we want to build process automation for data. It can be done quickly through the tool. We need not do coding and waste our time and efforts. The ease of learning depends on the person who is learning the product. It depends on whether they come from a developer background. It would be easy to learn if they have some experience in coding and have worked on integrations. I haven’t faced many challenges while scaling our integration solutions with MuleSoft Composer. The drag-and-drop interface has not impacted our project deployment time much. The customer support and price can be improved. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
28%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle. I don't know the exact price of the product.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've us...
What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?
The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?
It's costly, especially for Indian clients. Reducing the price would help them penetrate the Indian market. A two-year license costs around seventy lakhs rupees. It's a considerable amount.
What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?
Configuration could be easier, but we were able to handle it. It seems that juniors find it challenging, but seniors like me know how to configure it properly. There are no issues. There is also on...
 

Also Known As

Boomi
MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi iPaaS vs. MuleSoft Composer and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.