Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortinet FortiADC vs Radware LinkProof comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.9
Fortinet FortiADC support is generally efficient, though response times can vary based on issue priority and licensing challenges.
Sentiment score
7.4
Radware LinkProof's technical support is highly rated for its responsiveness and expertise, though some complex issues remain challenging.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Fortinet FortiADC offers scalable solutions, suiting thousands of users, but larger companies may need higher-end models for optimal performance.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Fortinet FortiADC is stable and reliable, with quick firmware updates that manage bugs, ensuring dependable performance.
Sentiment score
8.5
Radware LinkProof is highly praised for its stability and reliability, ensuring minimal downtime and smooth network operations.
 

Room For Improvement

Fortinet FortiADC requires enhancements in load-balancing, scalability, support, interface, documentation, pricing, and false positive detection.
Radware LinkProof requires better dashboard customization, high availability, improved support, and stronger marketing to boost competitiveness and awareness.
 

Setup Cost

Fortinet FortiADC offers competitive pricing with flexible licenses and potential discounts, requiring a yearly subscription for support.
Radware LinkProof is moderately priced, offering a balance between cost and functionality, with additional licensing required for some features.
 

Valuable Features

Fortinet FortiADC is valued for ease of use, strong features, flexible licensing, affordability, and compatibility with FortiOS products.
Radware LinkProof is highly valued for its scalability, top ADC ranking, and dynamic DNS management for seamless application access.
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiADC
Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
7th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Radware LinkProof
Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
14th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiADC is 9.4%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Radware LinkProof is 0.6%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
 

Featured Reviews

Saeid Khanipour Ghobani - PeerSpot reviewer
High-level load balancing and routing protocols but scalability is limited to 200 gigabits
The initial setup and configuration are very easy because the solution includes a simple OS. Initial configuration takes about ten minutes for simple environments. It is important to assess the environment and decide what services, servers, and web applications are needed. The solution can be configured in router mode or one-arm mode which uses source NAT as destination NAT to send traffic to the firewall. One-arm mode is more complex and requires discussions with our engineers. For example, you have a website with Node.js for your programming language, Amazon S3 for your CDN, NGINX for your web server, and you use both React and reCAPTCHA. Our team meets with your developer to learn your website and OS through a multi-step process and then we configure the solution to protect everything.
Saurabh-Pal - PeerSpot reviewer
Supports link load balance and has good stability
One person can do the configuration for Radware LinkProof, but more people will be needed to complete the configuration on time if you have multiple devices. Some people have a virtual license, while others have a license that needs to be upgraded. Depending upon the location, one or more technical persons are required for the solution's maintenance. Many people use Radware LinkProof, and it is available for small, medium, and enterprise businesses. I would not recommend Radware LinkProof to anyone because it only supports load balance, not DoS and WAF. If you have larger offices in different locations, you can use Radware LinkProof inside your offices. However, if you introduce it in a space open to the internet, you will have to use a separate device for DDoS and WAF. Overall, I rate Radware LinkProof an eight out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Retailer
5%
Computer Software Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
9%
Retailer
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Is Citrix ADC (formerly Netscaler) the best ADC to use and if not why?
For ADC, any ADC can do a good job. But in case if you want to add WAF functionality to the same ADC hardware you have to look for other ADC's like F5, Imperva, Radware, Fortinet, etc.
Do you recommend Fortinet FortiADC?
I recommend Fortinet FortiADC. My experience with Fortinet has been very positive. Our company has been using it for around five years. We mainly use FortiADC for the load balancing of application ...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiADC?
The user interface is very easy and integrates with Sandbox easily.
What do you like most about Radware LinkProof?
The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof for traffic distribution is its DNS management capability.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Radware LinkProof?
I would say Radware LinkProof falls into the mid-range pricing category. It is not cheap, but it is also not overly expensive.
What is your primary use case for Radware LinkProof?
I use Radware LinkProof to optimize our network by balancing multiple WAN links. It ensures uninterrupted access to applications by automatically redirecting traffic from failed or congested links.
 

Also Known As

FortiADC Application Delivery Controller, FortiADC
LinkProof
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
Papa John's, OSRAM, ADP, NYLS
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiADC vs. Radware LinkProof and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.