Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Galera Cluster vs IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager comparison

Galera Cluster and IBM are both solutions in the Cluster Provisioning category. Galera Cluster is ranked #3, while IBM is ranked #6. Galera Cluster holds a 8.3% mindshare in CP, compared to IBM’s 8.3% mindshare.
Galera Cluster
  • 72 Views
  • 8 Comparison Views
IBM Tivoli Provisioning Man...
  • 5 Views
  • 5 Comparison Views
 

Categories and Ranking

Galera Cluster
Ranking in Cluster Provisioning
3rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Tivoli Provisioning Man...
Ranking in Cluster Provisioning
6th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Cluster Provisioning category, the mindshare of Galera Cluster is 8.3%, down from 14.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager is 8.3%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cluster Provisioning
 

Comparisons

No data available
AutoSys Workload Automation vs IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager Logo
AutoSys Workload Automation vs IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager
Compared 53% of the time
Control-M vs IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager Logo
Control-M vs IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager
Compared 47% of the time
More IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager Competitors
 

Also Known As

No data available
Tivoli Provisioning Manager
 

Learn More

Galera Cluster
IBM
 

Overview

Galera Cluster for MySQL is  a true Multimaster Cluster based on synchronous replication. Galera Cluster is an easy-to-use, high-availability solution, which provides high system uptime, no data loss and scalability for future growth.

 

World’s most advanced features

  • Synchronous replication
  • Active-active multi-master topology
  • Read and write to any cluster node
  • Automatic membership control, failed nodes drop from the cluster
  • Automatic node joining
  • True parallel replication, on row level
  • Direct client connections, native MySQL look & feel

Un-seen benefits

  • No slave lag
  • No lost transactions
  • Both read and write scalability
  • Smaller client latencies
Tivoli Provisioning Manager helps organizations optimize efficiency, accuracy and service delivery by automating best practices for data center provisioning activities.
 

Sample Customers

OpenStack, KPN, HP
KPJ Healthcare Berhad, Keyword, Tennis Australia, Cxense ASA, SKIData AG, Unisys, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd, RAVInvest, Odin, Chapman University, CloudHesive, Cima Solutions Group, Projetech, Grow Strategy
See our list of best Cluster Provisioning vendors.

We monitor all Cluster Provisioning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.