Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AutoSys Workload Automation vs IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

AutoSys Workload Automation
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
79
Ranking in other categories
Workload Automation (8th)
IBM Tivoli Provisioning Man...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cluster Provisioning (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

AutoSys Workload Automation and IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. AutoSys Workload Automation is designed for Workload Automation and holds a mindshare of 16.1%, down 18.8% compared to last year.
IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager, on the other hand, focuses on Cluster Provisioning, holds 8.3% mindshare, up 6.8% since last year.
Workload Automation
Cluster Provisioning
 

Featured Reviews

Antony Askew - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time
The visibility and control features are somewhat limited. This is a recognized weakness, but thee vendor is currently revamping the user interface to address it. While the current UI is a bit outdated, it's undergoing improvement. AutoSys Workload Automation has some areas for improvement, particularly in housekeeping and product maintenance. These tasks are currently quite manual and labor-intensive for our team. Additionally, the reporting and forecasting functionalities could be more robust. One area for improvement with AutoSys Workload Automation is that it comprises several distinct tools configured to work together. This necessitates familiarity with multiple tools for effective solution management. Consequently, it can sometimes lack a sense of cohesiveness as a unified solution.
Use IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
47%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
6%
Insurance Company
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...
What do you like most about AutoSys Workload Automation?
The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE
Tivoli Provisioning Manager
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life
KPJ Healthcare Berhad, Keyword, Tennis Australia, Cxense ASA, SKIData AG, Unisys, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd, RAVInvest, Odin, Chapman University, CloudHesive, Cima Solutions Group, Projetech, Grow Strategy
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Redwood Software, Broadcom and others in Workload Automation. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.