We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and ESP Workload Automation Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."The initial setup is easy."
"The scheduling feature allows us to know when jobs are going to run and makes sure they run in the order needed."
"I find that it provides better agility in regards to job execution features."
"The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users."
"It is stable, it works, and it does what it is supposed to."
"The actual scheduling of our jobs has helped us tremendously. Before it was all done manually, and we've totally automated the whole functionality, so there's no longer a case where somebody didn't run something."
"Automation of patch process."
"AutoSys Workload Automation is a stable solution."
"The solution can scale."
"We have to escalate through channels to get to somebody who knows what's going on. It takes time that we do not necessarily have."
"We had a few issues, however, the issues were more on the infrastructure rather than with the application itself."
"It lacks support and integration with cloud computing platforms."
"An area for improvement in AutoSys Workload Automation is that it lacks advanced features or advanced built-in functionalities found in competitors, for example, an advanced workflow feature. Even the handling or notification from AutoSys Workload Automation isn't the best in the industry. Other products have very good workflow-related functionalities such as ActiveBatch that's missing in AutoSys Workload Automation, so I wish the tool had those features."
"They could do better supporting it. They have too many of the same type of products, so sometimes it doesn't get as much attention as it should."
"The graphical interface can be improved."
"We are trying to see if we can use this from a cloud perspective with AWS, Azure, and other clouds, but it seems that there is no cloud integration in this product. We would like to see cloud integration. We are very pleased with this solution, but we are moving our application to the cloud, and we found out that it doesn't support any cloud features. So, we are trying to find a replacement."
"Quick search feature and job analysis could be improved."
"The new version is going to have more web services where you could string together various web services so that you can create a workflow across multiple web services, which I don't think is there today."
Earn 20 points
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while ESP Workload Automation Intelligence is ranked 23rd in Workload Automation. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while ESP Workload Automation Intelligence is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESP Workload Automation Intelligence writes "Stable, connects with everything, and has great technical support". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and ActiveBatch by Redwood, whereas ESP Workload Automation Intelligence is most compared with Control-M, Stonebranch, IBM Workload Automation and CA 7 Workload Automation Intelligence.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.