Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs Metomic comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Public Monitoring
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
21st
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (26th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (19th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (18th)
Metomic
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
44th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Public Monitoring is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Metomic is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
 

Featured Reviews

ML
Mar 5, 2024
Helps us prioritize remediation tasks efficiently, improves our overall security visibility, and is effective in detecting and alerting us to security leaks quickly
GitGuardian Public Monitoring's detection capabilities are good. I'm still learning the ropes of using some search techniques. However, it's impressive how we can find information even if it's been deleted. That's helpful! The more I use GitGuardian Public Monitoring, the easier it becomes to identify false positives. When I started this role less than a year ago, it was my first time working with code. It took some time to adjust. However, I'm now getting faster at reviewing alerts and determining the risk. I can often tell if something is a genuine threat or just someone testing something out. In those cases, I can quickly confirm with the developer whether it's an actual secret. Overall, my detection skills are improving. This helps me filter through alerts more efficiently. When the system was first implemented last May, we had a lot of data to sift through, and GitGuardian Public Monitoring has made that process much faster. GitGuardian Public Monitoring helps us prioritize remediation tasks efficiently. It allows me to assign severity levels to detections. I can mark high-risk ones for immediate attention while leaving others in their triggered detection status. This way, I can easily filter detections later based on the assigned severity levels that are set by me or others to quickly find the ones I'm currently working on or those requiring the most critical attention. The Public Monitoring Explore feature is a powerful tool. It allows me to create searches beyond our usual parameters. They even have a helpful cheat sheet available. I've found it very useful, uncovering surprising information that required further action. Overall, it's a valuable resource. The Explore feature has been very helpful in uncovering potential issues that we can address immediately. These are issues that wouldn't have been identified through our regular alerts. In this way, Explore allows us to delve deeper and identify additional exposures and potential risks that we might otherwise miss. I'm currently using GitGuardian Public Monitoring to detect secrets and identify any exposure to our company's intellectual property code. That's the extent of our use case for now. I'm aware that GitGuardian is planning to release additional features, such as public Postman monitoring, which I'm very interested in. I believe we'll be incorporating that functionality in the future. As for honey tokens, I haven't had a chance to use them yet, but I'm familiar with the concept. I think utilizing honey tokens could also be beneficial, potentially helping us gauge how quickly exposed secrets are exploited. We initiated a trial of GitGuardian Public Monitoring last May, which lasted for several months. While it generated a significant number of alerts initially, which could be overwhelming, we were able to identify valuable findings during the trial period that demonstrated the product's worth. GitGuardian Public Monitoring improves our overall security visibility by eliminating blind spots. This helps us identify potential security risks that might otherwise go unnoticed for extended periods. GitGuardian has been very effective in helping us monitor our developers' public activity. I'd like to spend more time exploring its capabilities and using it to its full potential. While I'm confident we're currently up-to-date, there are likely additional features I haven't discovered yet. However, I trust GitGuardian to notify us promptly of any new threats that emerge. Overall, I'm impressed with its ability to catch a wide range of issues. Initially, users were unresponsive to our emails and questions, and they often became defensive. However, with increased interaction, I believe they're starting to understand that our primary goal is to comprehend and document the exposed information to help improve our meantime to remediation. GitGuardian has been very effective in detecting and alerting us to security leaks quickly. It's identified issues that we likely wouldn't have caught ourselves, either because we lack the resources or simply weren't actively searching for them. This has been helpful because it allows us to address these leaks promptly.
Use Metomic?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a bit expensive, but it works well. You get what you pay for."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Energy/Utilities Company
21%
Computer Software Company
19%
Government
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Public Monitoring?
The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Public Monitoring?
It's a bit expensive, but it works well. You get what you pay for. You get something that is fully managed with a lot of features, and a tool that is very efficient.
What needs improvement with GitGuardian Public Monitoring?
I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Align Technology, Automox, Fred Hutch, Instacart, Maven Wave, Mirantis, SafetyCulture, Snowflake, Talend
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Broadcom and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Updated: September 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.