Snyk and GitGuardian compete in the security tool category. GitGuardian seems to have the upper hand in secrets detection, while Snyk offers stronger integration capabilities and a developer-focused approach.
Features: Snyk is known for its simplicity and ease of integration, allowing developers to autonomously manage security. It features a comprehensive vulnerability database and offers extensive integration capabilities, including Slack for timely notifications. GitGuardian excels in secrets detection and comprehensive scanning, providing immediate alerts for potential security breaches. The "Dev in the Loop" feature enhances collaboration between developers and security teams, supporting various technologies with automated workflows.
Room for Improvement:Snyk lacks SAST or DAST capabilities, which would broaden its security solution. There's a need for better language support and improved notification filtering as well. GitGuardian could improve its historical scanning and incident management interfaces. Users also desire more granular access controls and better integration of the platform's components.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Snyk offers diverse deployment options, including public, private, hybrid cloud, and on-premises, backed by responsive technical support and comprehensive documentation. GitGuardian supports on-premises solutions as well. Its technical support is responsive, effective, and users benefit from clear documentation, aiding in deployment.
Pricing and ROI: Snyk's pricing is considered premium, but users find its comprehensive protection and time savings worthwhile. Its scalable licensing model meets various organizational needs. GitGuardian is reasonably priced, though slightly high for larger teams. Nonetheless, users acknowledge its value in preventing security issues, making it a critical investment. Both solutions contribute to productivity and security assurance, offering strategic benefits that justify their costs.
I can certainly say that we have saved significant time and resources in terms of people and automation.
The majority of our incidents for critical detectors and important secret types are remediated automatically or proactively by developers through GitGuardian's notification system, without security team involvement.
It effectively helps us with credentials security and has been performing satisfactorily.
I would rate their technical support a nine out of ten.
I would rate the technical support as excellent.
Our long-standing association has ensured smooth communication, resulting in favorable support experiences and satisfactory issue resolution.
Their response time aligns with their SLA commitments.
We could understand the implementation of the product and other features without the need for human interaction.
In terms of scalability, I would rate it around a ten out of ten, as it handles all the repositories and commit activity we have.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Currently, what GitGuardian Platform is doing works effectively.
Snyk allows for scaling across large organizations, accommodating tens of thousands of applications and over 60,000 repositories.
We set up a lot of the repository, so GitGuardian is a required check.
The SaaS platform has experienced two significant moments of downtime or instability in the last six months, requiring notices and retrospectives.
I would rate the stability of the GitGuardian Platform as excellent with no downtimes.
Another thing that would be good to see is some more metrics on the usage of the GitGuardian pre-push hooks.
The self-healing activity by developers isn't reflected in the analytics, requiring us to collect this data ourselves.
We are looking for better metrics and audit data, wanting more features such as knowing which users are creating the most secrets or committing the most secrets, what repository, what directory, and who is not checking in secrets.
It lacks the ability to select branches on its Web UI, forcing users to rely on CLI or CI/CD for that functionality.
The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial.
As we are moving toward GenAI, we expect Snyk to leverage AI features to improve code scanning findings.
Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.
It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool.
Snyk is recognized as the cheapest option we have evaluated.
After negotiations, we received a special package with a good price point.
Snyk is less expensive.
One of the best features of the solution is the ability to use pre-push hooks.
A high number of our exposures are remediated by developers before security needs to step in, as the self-healing playbook process engages them automatically.
GitGuardian Platform performs the capability to detect secrets in real time exceptionally, as it activates from the commit and can detect it immediately.
Our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.
Snyk helps detect vulnerabilities before code moves to production, allowing for integration with DevOps and providing a shift-left advantage by identifying and fixing bugs before deployment.
The best feature of Snyk is the integration with our ticketing system, which is Jira.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Snyk | 6.5% |
GitGuardian Platform | 0.9% |
Other | 92.6% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 10 |
Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
Large Enterprise | 13 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 20 |
Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
Large Enterprise | 21 |
GitGuardian is an advanced secrets security platform that strengthens Non-Human Identity security and ensures compliance with industry standards by detecting and managing secrets in development environments.
GitGuardian integrates Secrets Security and Secrets Observability, facilitating the detection of compromised secrets and managing legitimate secrets' lifecycle. Supporting over 450 types of secrets, the platform offers public monitoring for leaked data and employs honeytokens as an added defense. Trusted by over 600,000 developers, organizations such as Snowflake and ING rely on GitGuardian for robust secrets protection.
What features define GitGuardian?
What are the key benefits when evaluating GitGuardian?
In sectors like healthcare and telecommunications, GitGuardian is implemented for detecting and managing the exposure of sensitive information in code repositories. Teams benefit from its ability to integrate with platforms such as GitHub, allowing for immediate alerts and efficient remediation of security risks, enhancing application security by safeguarding operational environments.
Snyk excels in integrating security within the development lifecycle, providing teams with an AI Trust Platform that combines speed with security efficiency, ensuring robust AI application development.
Snyk empowers developers with AI-ready engines offering broad coverage, accuracy, and speed essential for modern development. With AI-powered visibility and security, Snyk allows proactive threat prevention and swift threat remediation. The platform supports shifts toward LLM engineering and AI code analysis, enhancing security and development productivity. Snyk collaborates with GenAI coding assistants for improved productivity and AI application threat management. Platform extensibility supports evolving standards with API access and native integrations, ensuring comprehensive and seamless security embedding in development tools.
What are Snyk's standout features?Industries leverage Snyk for security in CI/CD pipelines by automating checks for dependency vulnerabilities and managing open-source licenses. Its Docker and Kubernetes scanning capabilities enhance container security, supporting a proactive security approach. Integrations with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps optimize implementation across diverse software environments.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.