Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Engineering Rhapsody vs Polarion ALM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.9
IBM Rhapsody's support is valued but faces delays; users suggest better online resources alongside local vendor reliance.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.4
IBM Engineering Rhapsody needs better reporting, user interfaces, tutorials, customization, integration, stability, and Git for enhanced user experience.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
IBM Engineering Rhapsody is scalable for various team sizes, though potential issues may arise with larger user numbers and integration.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
3.2
IBM Engineering Rhapsody is costly, but users value its features and maintain long-term use despite the price.
Sentiment score
4.1
Polarion ALM's high pricing suits larger enterprises, justified by its functionality, with varying costs based on configuration and needs.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
IBM Engineering Rhapsody is generally stable, but experiences vary, with some users reporting occasional bugs and performance issues.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
IBM Engineering Rhapsody enhances planning with Scrum, Git integration, compliance, and cost-effective collaboration via a customizable, cloud-based platform.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Engineering Rhapsody
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
13th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Polarion ALM
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of IBM Engineering Rhapsody is 2.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polarion ALM is 7.3%, up from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

Harold Pogue - PeerSpot reviewer
A complex deployment that is not stable, but is cloud-based
The team of 15 to 20 software engineers uses IBM Rational ALM and Jira for testing. They coupled different online packages together because the Duration Enterprise was impossible to use IBM Rational ALM did not help the organization and we ended up moving to another solution. The most valuable…
Dina Bindi - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides traceability and compliance with high flexibility
It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective. However, we don't use DevOps-related features, such as integration with tools like SVN or Git, because we use Azure DevOps. The aspects related to requirements, testing, changes, tasks, and agile methodology are excellent, which is why we've been using it for a long time.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
23%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
25%
Computer Software Company
15%
Healthcare Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Rational ALM?
The user interface requires significant improvement as it is overly complex. For business users with no experience in IT, it can be particularly challenging to understand the UI and create test cas...
What is your primary use case for IBM Rational ALM?
We use IBM Rational ALM as part of our overall application suite for our manufacturing company. It is used by our engineering team to capture requirements, perform testing, and manage defects. Spec...
What needs improvement with Polarion ALM?
I also recently suggested that CMS consider incorporating generative artificial intelligence into the system. This could greatly enhance requirement checking, improve form, content, and clarity, an...
What is your primary use case for Polarion ALM?
We use Polarion ALM for software development, including requirements management, testing, change requests, and task tracking. We set up the environment by configuring items and reports based on use...
 

Also Known As

Rational ALM, MKS
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Tennis Australia, WeCloud AB, Port Otago Limited, Logicalis US, Valmer, The Chevrolet Volt, Ashurst
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Rhapsody vs. Polarion ALM and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.