PTC Integrity vs Polarion ALM comparison

"The software is stable."

"We had a nice experience with technical support."

"Polarion ALM has some valuable tools for managing our targets and requirements. I think that's its best feature."

"It is a very stable solution."

"The technical support is quite good."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its browser experience. I rate its traceability feature a ten out of ten. From the initial stage to the release, you can manage everything through a single point."

"You can see the work ticket and you can circulate that within the teams. You can define your flows, customize according to your needs, and you can create dashboards and create the reports according to your needs."

"I am impressed with the solution’s stability."

"I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn."

"We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client."

"Complete traceability as per process requirements."

"It's a good tool to manage software versions, update the status, and manage tasks."

"PTC Integrity has good stability."

"The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project."

"The solution is flexible in terms of customization. You can bend and reformat it in many ways. You can also customize the APIs and public functions."

"We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information."

"One of Polarion's shortcomings would be planning. It can handle plans, but the planning feature is very basic."

"Based on my understanding, the tool's integration capabilities with multiple tools is an area of concern that Polarion needs to focus on more."

"The planning and task management aspects of the solution were not that easy."

"The ease-of-use could be improved a little."

"The solution can be improved by making it more user-friendly, and a server-based application rather than client based."

"The interface for this solution needs to be made more user-friendly to provide a better user experience."

"The configuration aspect of the solution is not easy. A person needs a lot of programming knowledge in order to successfully handle the job."

"The weak point of Polarion ALM software is about reporting and time for extraction of the data...The quality of reporting needs to improve."

"I would like to see better integration from the architectural side."

"It's not easy to plan on this solution and it's not user-friendly. The interface should be more like a web interface. It's not easy to use."

"There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA."

"To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue."

"The web version does not have all the functionalities of the non-web version. Administration and adding/removing fields, etc. cannot be done on the web version. People want solutions that are compatible with Android. I also want to have a version by which I can bulk edit all the fields."

"From my experience over the years, I believe there might be room for improvement in PTC Integrity. While it's already a good product, it tends to be slower than other software. When it becomes bulky, it slows down even more, sometimes leading to crashes or hangs that require restarting the computer before being able to use PTC Integrity again. This has been my experience multiple times."

"The tool's web-based UI needs improvement. Some functionalities don't work yet, and querying items is slow. Also, it's not in the cloud yet. I don't know if they'll do it in the future because they already have core agreements with customers. If they offer these functionalities, customers will likely buy their product."

"For complex businesses, the internal templates could have more flexibility and compatibility."

"The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises."

"If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch."

"Our license for Polarion ALM is yearly. And it's not the cheapest tool that we've looked at. So if we had made our decision purely based on the licensing cost, we wouldn't have selected Polarion."

"You have to pay around 50-60 euros per user."

"Software for medical devices is always expensive."

"It is an expensive product."

"The solution is expensive."

"The product is expensive."