PTC Integrity vs TFS comparison

PTC and Microsoft are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. PTC is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.7, while Microsoft is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.4. PTC holds a 4.1% mindshare in ALM, compared to Microsoft’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 70% of PTC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

PTC Integrity

Read 14 PTC Integrity reviews

1,959 Views
1,959 Comparison Views

70% willing to recommend

TFS

Read 99 TFS reviews

3,574 Views
2,645 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

PTC Integrity

TFS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

PTC Integrity and TFS are competing in application lifecycle management and project collaboration. TFS is favored for its integration capabilities and flexibility, while PTC Integrity is renowned for its reliability and advanced change management features.

Features: PTC Integrity offers excellent configuration management, traceability, and is suited for stringent control environments. Its advanced change management ensures reliable operations. TFS provides strong integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, DevOps capabilities, and supports agile development. Its flexibility and seamless Visual Studio integration make it ideal for diverse environments.

Room for Improvement: PTC Integrity's user interface could be modernized and simplified for easier navigation. Integration with third-party tools might be limited. Users may face a learning curve due to complex configurations. TFS could enhance its test management usability without costly licensing. Reporting depth could be improved to offer more detailed insights. Simplifying deployment configurations further would cater to less experienced users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PTC Integrity is recognized for stable deployments in complex environments and is supported by reliable customer service. TFS offers flexible cloud and on-premise options, benefiting from extensive documentation and community support. Its deployment options cater to various organizational needs.

Pricing and ROI: PTC Integrity demands a higher upfront investment, justified by its advanced features, offering long-term ROI for compliance-heavy industries. TFS features scalable pricing, enabling quicker ROI through existing infrastructure and enhanced integration efficiencies. TFS appeals to cost-conscious buyers seeking robust features at manageable costs.

To learn more, read our detailed PTC Integrity vs. TFS Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

PTC Integrity vs. TFS

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,744 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PTC Integrity

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

12th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TFS

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of PTC Integrity is 4.1%, up from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TFS is 3.7%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
TFS	3.7%
PTC Integrity	4.1%
Other	92.2%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

SHRINIVAS ALAGERI

Architect at a media company with 10,001+ employees

Customization has enabled long-term document and requirement management for complex projects

PTC Integrity should get rid of the old thick client and move everything to the thin client. The thin client should be made the single source of truth, the way it is for Codebeamer. PTC Integrity should try to integrate this with AI and should have automatic requirement to test case mapping and other AI features that are in Codebeamer. It is not easy for people to migrate from one tool to another, even though it is from the same product. PTC took over the In-Link product, so if I have to migrate my Integrity to In-Link, why would I replicate everything here? People are happy with what they have. The only headache is the thick client, which is a problem for the installation team. By having a thin client, people can directly open it from the web browser and it would be much easier and much better than a thick client on the system. With a thick client, you have Java installation that needs to be done and you have all those certificates to be installed for SSL. With a thin client, it would be much better and you could do all the administrative things also in that. I don't understand why they want a thick client. They could replace it with a thin client, the way it is for Codebeamer. They should incorporate all the AI things. PTC Integrity should become another tool with all the new features and new enhancements, and they should eliminate the thick client altogether.

Read full review

Parvez Shaikh

Service delivery manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Ensures team collaboration with strong version control but could improve testing capabilities

Version control is the most basic feature in TFS. It has been there since the beginning. We use it primarily for that purpose. Basically ensuring that the code is not overwritten by other team members and maintaining the sanctity of the code. Bringing order to a disparate team which is virtual at different locations is very important, and TFS provides that control. Once you update a code, nobody can modify it until you are done working on it and check in. It is a great product that revolutionized the way teams work together on Microsoft pieces of code. The versioning part has unique features and capabilities which are unmatched with other products out there.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project."

"PTC Integrity has good stability."

"The most valuable feature of PTC Integrity is its integration with our existing PTC tools, especially for drawing release activities."

"We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client."

"PTC Integrity provides some set of APIs which makes it very flexible to build an end-to-end SaaS product and an end-to-end software product."

"The solution is flexible in terms of customization. You can bend and reformat it in many ways. You can also customize the APIs and public functions."

"I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their products. Previously, customers were using different software to manage their products. However, PTC Integrity offers a solution for requirements management, test management, and even development to support live ticket management. So instead of using multiple software tools, we can use it for all these purposes."

"We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information."

More PTC Integrity pros

"The most valuable feature is integration, particularly if you have a .NET application."

"The most valuable feature of TFS is the central repository, and you can see what changes other developers did from which branch."

"The most valuable feature from my point of view is project management, which includes user stories as well as task management."

"This solution enables us to link all items usefully, in the way we use Agile."

"TFS' most valuable feature is the triage process. It is a robust solution that is easy to use."

"What I like the most is that you can set permissions on just one folder."

"Some of the valuable features are version control and the ability to create different collections in terms of segregating the authorization for teams who connect to small projects."

"The solution's iteration board is good because you can track all your work with it."

More TFS pros

Cons

"We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all."

"It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer."

"The tool's web-based UI needs improvement. Some functionalities don't work yet, and querying items is slow. Also, it's not in the cloud yet. I don't know if they'll do it in the future because they already have core agreements with customers. If they offer these functionalities, customers will likely buy their product."

"I would like to see better integration from the architectural side."

"PTC Integrity is causing us a headache. We have to install it in 3,000 different systems."

"From my experience over the years, I believe there might be room for improvement in PTC Integrity. While it's already a good product, it tends to be slower than other software. When it becomes bulky, it slows down even more, sometimes leading to crashes or hangs that require restarting the computer before being able to use PTC Integrity again. This has been my experience multiple times."

"To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue."

"There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA."

More PTC Integrity cons

"As an end-user, I expect the solution's performance to be faster while staying as stable as possible."

"They have room for improvement in merging the source code changes for multiple developers across files. It is very good at highlighting the changes that the source code automatically does not know how to handle, but it's not very good at reporting the ones that it did automatically. There are times when we have source code that gets merged, and we lose the changes that we expected to happen. It can get a little confusing at times. They can just do a little bit better on the merging of changes for multiple developers."

"TFS should have capabilities similar to Git, like storing all types of artifacts in the repository."

"The solution is stable but could improve."

"The execution of test cases could stand improvement."

"TFS on-premise does not support integration with SharePoint Online."

"TFS and MTM have their own style of working and they are different from other tools like Jira or TestRail, which are simpler and easy to use."

"The dashboard and the customization of dashboards is an area they have to work on."

More TFS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive."

"We pay for the license yearly."

"TFS is not cheap."

"There are different prices depending on the configurations. There is a free version available. There is no extra cost for the solution. However, the hardware could be something that needs to be considered."

"I was working with the engineering team, and that was not under my umbrella. From what I can remember, its license was yearly. They had the licenses on a per-user basis, and they included MTM."

"The pricing is reasonable at this time."

"It is pretty expensive compared to other project management tools."

"It's just as expensive as HPE ALM, without many of the features, best used for development tool only to avoid higher costs."

"It is an expensive solution."

More TFS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,744 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

25%

Computer Software Company

13%

Healthcare Company

University

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PTC Integrity?

I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their produ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PTC Integrity?

PTC Integrity is expensive, but it is cheaper compared to IBM Rational. The comparative affordability in pricing is an advantage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PTC Integrity?

The user-friendliness of PTC Integrity can be improved. The interface is not intuitive for first-time users and takes time to get accustomed to. A more straightforward and intuitive interface would...

See all answers

Which is better - TFS or Azure DevOps?

TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very fri...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TFS?

While I do not know the exact pricing, TFS is likely more expensive than GitLab.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TFS?

From a testing perspective, while the build and deploy automation capability and pipeline integration are already present to a great extent, these are areas where TFS can improve further.

See all answers

Comparisons

Codebeamer vs PTC Integrity

Compared 41% of the time

Jira vs PTC Integrity

Compared 12% of the time

Polarion ALM vs PTC Integrity

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PTC Integrity

Compared 7% of the time

Rally Software vs PTC Integrity

Compared 3% of the time

More PTC Integrity Competitors

Jira vs TFS

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs TFS

Compared 14% of the time

TestRail vs TFS

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs TFS

Compared 4% of the time

More TFS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

PTC Integrity

February 2026

Download PTC Integrity product report

Buyer's Guide

TFS

January 2026

Download TFS product report

Also Known As

MKS

Team Foundation Server

Overview

The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.

PTC

Visual Studio’s Team Foundation Server (TFS) is a powerful application development lifecycle management solution. It aids developers in managing every aspect of their DevOps and application creation. TFS combines many different types of solutions into a single powerful platform.

Visual Studio TFS Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy TFS include:

Build automation. TFS enables users to create definitions that can easily automate any and all tasks that are critical to the development of their applications. Businesses can utilize features that are built into TFS to accomplish preset tasks that can help them create the application of their choice. This can include enabling them to run automated tests when the need arises. Additionally, users can create custom tasks that will run automatically and allow users to focus their attention on the areas that most demand their focus.

Security. TFS is designed with the security of a user’s DevOps in mind. It enables an organization to restrict user permissions so that only developers that are meant to have access to particular parts of the development process can perform tasks related to those sections. It segments the development process to reduce the possibility of sensitive data being stolen.

Enables product rollbacks. TFS keeps copies of past versions of the organization’s application. Users can sift through the different versions that are available and can redeploy the version that best fits their needs should it ever become necessary to do so.

Visual Studio TFS Features

Source code management. TFS comes with all of the tools that developers need to completely manage their source code. They can share their code so that multiple developers can work on the same project. Additionally, TFS enables them to do things like review the history of a particular piece of source code.
Project management. Organizations can leverage the wealth of project management features that TFS offers and ensure that their projects run as smoothly as possible. Project managers are able to use TFS to control every aspect of their project, from the planning stage until the application’s development has reached its conclusion.

Reporting. TFS enables users to generate reports that leverage critical metrics and provide them with important insights into the applications that they are creating. These comprehensive reports can be secured so that only users with the proper level of clearance can access them.

Reviews from Real Users

TFS is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its source code management capabilities and its powerful integration suite.

Carl B., the vice president of engineering at Vertex Downhole Ltd, writes, “The most valuable features are related to source code management. Using TFS for source code management and being able to branch and have multiple developers work on the same projects is valuable. We can also branch and merge code back together.”

Ashish K., the principal consultant at Wipro, says, “I have found almost all of the features valuable because it integrates well with your Microsoft products. If a client is using the entire Microsoft platform, then TFS would be definitely preferable. It integrates with the digital studio development environment as well.”

Microsoft

Sample Customers

TRW Automotive

Vendex KBB IT Services, Info Support, Fujitsu Consulting, TCSC, Airways New Zealand, HP

Buyer's Guide

PTC Integrity vs. TFS

February 2026

Free Report: PTC Integrity vs. TFS

Find out what your peers are saying about PTC Integrity vs. TFS and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,744 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our PTC Integrity vs. TFS report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.