Codebeamer vs PTC Integrity comparison

"CodeBeamer provides full traceability, excellent collaboration, regulatory compliance, and instant reporting with its holistic approach from requirement management to testing."

"Utilizing Codebeamer has helped my organization by saving time in our processes."

"You can track the metrics in the Agile dashboard very easily."

"Since implementing this solution we have better communication and information exchange with customers."

"The traceability is so simple that I don't need to do any additional configurations related to traceability."

"It is a stable solution."

"The solution easily replaces IBM DOORS, which no longer offers maintenance in China."

"One of the most valuable features of Codebeamer is its strong performance."

"I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn."

"We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client."

"Complete traceability as per process requirements."

"The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project."

"We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information."

"The solution is flexible in terms of customization. You can bend and reformat it in many ways. You can also customize the APIs and public functions."

"The tool is quite structured and has a good command set."

"It's a good tool to manage software versions, update the status, and manage tasks."

"The search and replace feature within the tool itself could be improved."

"The product's UI is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Codebeamer is not completely compatible with our internal network setup."

"It would be helpful if Codebeamer's overall processing and integration with software like Jira could be improved."

"During migrations from other platforms to CodeBeamer, there have been instances where we encountered issues that required redoing certain tasks."

"It's still a fairly new tool that lacks maturity right now."

"I would like to see more, easily trackable reports."

"Usability needs to be improved."

"There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA."

"The tool's web-based UI needs improvement. Some functionalities don't work yet, and querying items is slow. Also, it's not in the cloud yet. I don't know if they'll do it in the future because they already have core agreements with customers. If they offer these functionalities, customers will likely buy their product."

"We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all."

"The web version does not have all the functionalities of the non-web version. Administration and adding/removing fields, etc. cannot be done on the web version. People want solutions that are compatible with Android. I also want to have a version by which I can bulk edit all the fields."

"It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer."

"From my experience over the years, I believe there might be room for improvement in PTC Integrity. While it's already a good product, it tends to be slower than other software. When it becomes bulky, it slows down even more, sometimes leading to crashes or hangs that require restarting the computer before being able to use PTC Integrity again. This has been my experience multiple times."

"For complex businesses, the internal templates could have more flexibility and compatibility."

"To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue."

"Pricing is good when compared to similar ALM solutions."

"They're not the most expensive product on the market, but they're not the cheapest either — I'd say codeBeamer ALM is moderately priced."

"Codebeamer is not a cheap solution."

"It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards."

"The product is expensive."