Codebeamer and Microsoft Azure DevOps are competitors in software lifecycle management. Azure DevOps has the upper hand in feature richness, being valued for its robust capabilities, while Codebeamer stands out for pricing and support, appealing for cost-effectiveness.
Features: Codebeamer provides strong requirements management, risk management, and compliance support, particularly useful for industries requiring governance. Microsoft Azure DevOps is known for seamless integration with Microsoft services, scalability, and comprehensive project management.
Room for Improvement: Codebeamer could improve its feature set to compete better with more integrated tools like Azure DevOps. The user interface could be made more intuitive and enhancements to support broader tool integration may be necessary. For Azure DevOps, streamlining the learning curve and addressing cost concerns for smaller organizations could be beneficial. Greater focus on personalized support could also enhance customer satisfaction.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both platforms support scalable deployment. Azure DevOps offers faster integration with Microsoft infrastructures, while Codebeamer emphasizes personalized support, beneficial for smaller teams or specialized sectors. Azure DevOps presents a slightly steeper learning curve but offers significant integration benefits.
Pricing and ROI: Codebeamer is preferred for competitive pricing and delivers notable ROI, especially in regulated industries. Azure DevOps might have higher upfront costs, but these are often justified by enhancements in productivity through its comprehensive feature set and efficient workflows.
The solution has produced a return on investment.
Codebeamer saves time and money for certain use cases, such as AUTOSPICE implementations.
On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the best, I would say ROI is an eight.
If I raise an issue as high priority, I receive responses in six to eight hours.
For out-of-the-box support, the customer service from PTC is satisfactory.
Resolving issues took time since understanding our unique problems was not always straightforward for support teams.
In a project, I have experienced up to 180 licenses running during peak times and as low as ten licenses during downtime without facing upgrade or downgrade issues.
The scalability has left me pleased, not just for our teams in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, but as we expanded into North America, Africa, and even Australia.
Running it independently or with a bigger server generally doesn't cause any issues.
There were stability issues due to version compatibility.
The solution is stable, and we did not encounter any stability issues.
Older versions of PDM Windchill face compatibility issues with newer versions of Codebeamer, requiring users to downgrade Codebeamer to establish integration.
If terminology changes, modifications must be done manually or by exporting the document to Word or Excel, which is time-consuming.
Those processes are a bit difficult for some customers who may not have technical knowledge and don't go through the entire documentation.
Enhanced system guidance highlighting best practices would be beneficial, especially if experienced personnel are not available for support.
Codebeamer is on the expensive side, but it provides ready-made modules for standards like ASPICE and ISO 26262, which might justify the cost for customers looking for those solutions.
They don't even provide a POC where you can have a sandbox or stuff that you can go through and see how exactly it's costing.
I find it to be expensive.
Its integration capability is very high, with almost eighty to eighty-five percent of integrations available readily out of the box, minimizing the need for specific integration-related work.
Codebeamer saves on time and resources with its web-based client, eliminating the need to install it on every system.
I can't approve my own request and move the code around without a review.
Our company organized a training session with a certified Azure expert, which was extremely beneficial for adopting best practices during the initial three months.
codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.
Microsoft Azure DevOps is a cloud service that enables developers to collaborate on code development projects and create and deploy applications quicker than ever before. The service helps unite developers, project managers, and software development experts through a collaborative experience while using the application. For the users' convenience, Azure DevOps offers the user cloud services through Azure DevOps Services or an on-premises service using Azure DevOps Server. In addition, it supports integration with additional services and adding extensions, including the ability for the user to create their own custom extensions.
Azure DevOps provides a variety of unified features that can be accessed through their web browser or IDE client, such as:
Benefits of Microsoft Azure DevOps
Microsoft Azure DevOps offers many benefits, including:
Reviews from Real Users
Microsoft Azure DevOps stands out among its competitors for a variety of reasons. Two major ones are its ability to forecast how long each task will take and the ability for users to follow the entire development process.
PeerSpot viewers note the effectiveness of this solution. An executive chief operating officer for a cloud provider notes, “We can forecast tasks and the number of hours a task will take and can compare it with how long a task actually takes.”
Carlos H., a product and system director at SPCM, writes, “I think the most usable thing is that you can follow the whole progress of the development process. This makes it very useful for us.”
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
