Codebeamer and Microsoft Azure DevOps are competitors in software lifecycle management. Azure DevOps has the upper hand in feature richness, being valued for its robust capabilities, while Codebeamer stands out for pricing and support, appealing for cost-effectiveness.
Features: Codebeamer provides strong requirements management, risk management, and compliance support, particularly useful for industries requiring governance. Microsoft Azure DevOps is known for seamless integration with Microsoft services, scalability, and comprehensive project management.
Room for Improvement: Codebeamer could improve its feature set to compete better with more integrated tools like Azure DevOps. The user interface could be made more intuitive and enhancements to support broader tool integration may be necessary. For Azure DevOps, streamlining the learning curve and addressing cost concerns for smaller organizations could be beneficial. Greater focus on personalized support could also enhance customer satisfaction.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both platforms support scalable deployment. Azure DevOps offers faster integration with Microsoft infrastructures, while Codebeamer emphasizes personalized support, beneficial for smaller teams or specialized sectors. Azure DevOps presents a slightly steeper learning curve but offers significant integration benefits.
Pricing and ROI: Codebeamer is preferred for competitive pricing and delivers notable ROI, especially in regulated industries. Azure DevOps might have higher upfront costs, but these are often justified by enhancements in productivity through its comprehensive feature set and efficient workflows.
ROI can manifest through cost savings and increased development speed.
Codebeamer saves time and money for certain use cases, such as AUTOSPICE implementations.
The solution has produced a return on investment.
On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the best, I would say ROI is an eight.
There has been a measurable improvement in productivity of around 40 to 50% after implementing Microsoft Azure DevOps, which has allowed more time to be spent on other things.
If I raise an issue as high priority, I receive responses in six to eight hours.
For out-of-the-box support, the customer service from PTC is satisfactory.
When requirements arise, they are raised and often get fixed within one or two days.
Resolving issues took time since understanding our unique problems was not always straightforward for support teams.
I would rate technical support from Microsoft for Microsoft Azure DevOps an eight out of ten.
In a project, I have experienced up to 180 licenses running during peak times and as low as ten licenses during downtime without facing upgrade or downgrade issues.
It should come with documentation that is accessible for users, especially for newcomers who might not have any prior knowledge.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the scalability of Codebeamer as eight or nine because it is a highly scalable solution.
The scalability has left me pleased, not just for our teams in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, but as we expanded into North America, Africa, and even Australia.
Microsoft Azure DevOps is scalable, with multiple options available to scale up the product as needed, given its Microsoft backing.
Running it independently or with a bigger server generally doesn't cause any issues.
From a scale of one to ten, I would rate the stability of Codebeamer as eight to nine because the solution is highly stable.
There were stability issues due to version compatibility.
Its stability might be attributed to its legacy as an on-premise solution that has been in development for more than 25 years.
There was just one time when there was some infrastructure issue from Microsoft's side, so we faced some glitches for a few minutes only, not for hours or a day.
Microsoft Azure DevOps is definitely stable, as it is available most of the time, with very few downtimes.
Older versions of PDM Windchill face compatibility issues with newer versions of Codebeamer, requiring users to downgrade Codebeamer to establish integration.
For a client with a medium configuration server, Codebeamer did not work initially until the system was upgraded.
There should be more integration tools available.
Those processes are a bit difficult for some customers who may not have technical knowledge and don't go through the entire documentation.
Out of the box, the solution is effective, yet with advancements in AI, it has the potential to be more intuitive.
Instead of customers having to try many options themselves, they benefit from practitioner recommendations.
Codebeamer is on the expensive side, but it provides ready-made modules for standards like ASPICE and ISO 26262, which might justify the cost for customers looking for those solutions.
Codebeamer is fairly priced against competition.
They don't even provide a POC where you can have a sandbox or stuff that you can go through and see how exactly it's costing.
I find it to be expensive.
Azure charges only the parking cost, not for unnecessary or unwanted cost.
Codebeamer saves on time and resources with its web-based client, eliminating the need to install it on every system.
Its integration capability is very high, with almost eighty to eighty-five percent of integrations available readily out of the box, minimizing the need for specific integration-related work.
The requirements management aspect of Codebeamer is critical because it helps various industries, such as automotive or medical devices, to capture requirements based on industry-specific standards and processes.
Whenever something is created or deployed, it automatically triggers the automated scripts, generates reports, and updates the test cases, providing a seamless end-to-end activity.
I can't approve my own request and move the code around without a review.
Our company organized a training session with a certified Azure expert, which was extremely beneficial for adopting best practices during the initial three months.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure DevOps | 10.3% |
| Codebeamer | 7.7% |
| Other | 82.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 42 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 28 |
| Large Enterprise | 69 |
codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.
Microsoft Azure DevOps is a cloud service that enables developers to collaborate on code development projects and create and deploy applications quicker than ever before. The service helps unite developers, project managers, and software development experts through a collaborative experience while using the application. For the users' convenience, Azure DevOps offers the user cloud services through Azure DevOps Services or an on-premises service using Azure DevOps Server. In addition, it supports integration with additional services and adding extensions, including the ability for the user to create their own custom extensions.
Azure DevOps provides a variety of unified features that can be accessed through their web browser or IDE client, such as:
Benefits of Microsoft Azure DevOps
Microsoft Azure DevOps offers many benefits, including:
Reviews from Real Users
Microsoft Azure DevOps stands out among its competitors for a variety of reasons. Two major ones are its ability to forecast how long each task will take and the ability for users to follow the entire development process.
PeerSpot viewers note the effectiveness of this solution. An executive chief operating officer for a cloud provider notes, “We can forecast tasks and the number of hours a task will take and can compare it with how long a task actually takes.”
Carlos H., a product and system director at SPCM, writes, “I think the most usable thing is that you can follow the whole progress of the development process. This makes it very useful for us.”
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
