Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Codebeamer vs Jama Connect comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Codebeamer's customer support is praised for transparency and speed, with users suggesting a hotline chat for improvement.
Sentiment score
7.1
Jama Connect support is responsive and knowledgeable, with room for improvement in license management tools and analysis capabilities.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Codebeamer is scalable across platforms, rated favorably against competitors, effective but requires effort to adapt to features.
Sentiment score
6.5
Jama Connect offers improved scalability, but UI limitations and SSO issues impact handling large projects and third-party access.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.8
Codebeamer is praised for its reliability and stability, earning high ratings despite occasional minor glitches.
Sentiment score
7.8
Jama Connect is stable and reliable with minimal downtime and few glitches, achieving a seven out of ten rating.
 

Room For Improvement

Codebeamer requires enhanced features, usability, integration, international support, documentation, intuitive interface, and improved marketing and compatibility strategies.
Jama Connect users seek UI modernization, improved functionality, better integrations, enhanced support, and stronger security with clearer pricing.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users view Codebeamer pricing as competitive and aligned with industry standards, despite not being the cheapest option.
Jama Connect offers adaptable pricing with flexible licensing, though some find it costly compared to competitors, especially for creative licenses.
 

Valuable Features

Codebeamer excels in traceability, customization, and integrations, ideal for automotive and pharmaceuticals, replacing tools like IBM DOORS.
Jama Connect offers requirements management, traceability, integration, and analytics, improving productivity and compliance with an intuitive interface.
 

Categories and Ranking

Codebeamer
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
10th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Jama Connect
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
11th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Application Requirements Management (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Codebeamer is 7.7%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jama Connect is 2.8%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

Gaurav Kandurwar - PeerSpot reviewer
Has good technical support services, but the migration process needs improvement
In my current company, we previously used multiple tools for requirement management, test management, and tracking, such as Arvines, a hardware list for test management, and Jira for tracking purposes. However, these tools were part of a segregated environment, and management decided to upgrade them due to their outdated functionalities. Consequently, my team and I evaluated various tools for requirement management and chose CodeBeamer for its flexibility. We found it is more adaptable to our organization's needs and processes, making it a suitable choice for our migration efforts. During the evaluation process, we considered features compatibility with our business processes and flexibility to accommodate changes. This aspect was crucial to minimizing adjustment time and ensuring a smooth transition to the new tool.
David Wilson - PeerSpot reviewer
Mainly used for requirements management, but its validation piece is not time-efficient at all
Like anything, Jama Connect relies highly on the company's culture because I found the whole review process to sound good, but it does not work in reality. Companies that use the tool are all pretty immature with requirements management, and therefore, they don't have the culture of doing that. You're always chasing them up and end up having review meetings, and no one pays attention to those review notices. The solution is very software-centric, and its validation piece is not time-efficient at all. It's very desktop verification and validation. You need to have it running and loading, which is not efficient. It's very cumbersome and overhead-intensive for verification management.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
31%
Computer Software Company
15%
Healthcare Company
8%
Transportation Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
26%
Healthcare Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about codeBeamer ALM?
The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for codeBeamer ALM?
As I am not involved in purchasing the product, it is difficult for me to comment on the product's pricing model.
What needs improvement with codeBeamer ALM?
Codebeamer is not completely compatible with our internal network setup, which could be improved.
What do you like most about Jama Connect?
I like Jama Connect because it's easy to use and understand. The widgets are great, and linking is straightforward. The solution is not complex compared to its competitors.
What needs improvement with Jama Connect?
There are delays sometimes from the Jama Connect team in resolving issues. It's important to maintain and educate customers about the solutions they have.
What is your primary use case for Jama Connect?
Jama Connect is used to integrate solutions such as the Google App Store and Microsoft Azure. It provides single identity provider access, enabling Gmail access or Google access for users.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

codeBeamer ALM
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault
Deloitte, SpaceX, Omnigon, Delft University
Find out what your peers are saying about Codebeamer vs. Jama Connect and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.